PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Is Ukraine about to have a war? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/639666-ukraine-about-have-war.html)

Imagegear 19th Apr 2021 06:30


it’s neighbours never get strong enough to be a military threat.
For interest...

The implications of Europe and the UK positioning 40,000 or more, troops, aircraft and ships, on the borders of Kaliningrad would send what message? Since the country besides it's predominantly Russian population has elements of Ukrainian, Belarusian, Tatar, German, Armenian, Polish, and Lithuanian people, perhaps the justification could be termed prevention of "ethnic cleansing".

While Ukraine is considerably larger than Kaliningrad, the comparison in size when considering a military threat from Russia can only be seen for what it is.

"First they came for Estonia, then Lithuania, later they entered Poland, finally they came for.....but there was no one left to object."

The strong, threatening and intimidating the weak, there are similarities with historic events.

IG

West Coast 19th Apr 2021 07:00


The US has done more than its share of killing overseas in the name of what it sees as freedom
Aided by our trusty sidekick the UK.

Actually, I think we learned it from your lot.

Asturias56 19th Apr 2021 07:15

Tsk, tsk, tsk............................ you'll be bringing up the Opium Wars next................. ;)

ORAC 19th Apr 2021 08:52

West Coast, there are only 22 countries the UK has never invaded. I think that’s a record that will be hard to beat....

(It might be less than that - see link below reference Guatemala. I spent 3 happy months at Butcher radar in Belize back in 1979. The same may apply to a couple of the others as well)

https://www.vice.com/en/article/xdmq...army-civil-war

https://www.statista.com/chart/3441/...ed-by-britain/


https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....f7334ffe8.jpeg

Asturias56 19th Apr 2021 16:26

You can see why the British never bothered - all a bit of a drossy collection TBH - maybe excepting Sweden.................. I'm pretty sure during the Great Game they pushed agents up into Turkmenistan and Tajikistan but the Russians got there first. Also I can't remember them invading the Congo (Zaire) or Greenland?

NutLoose 19th Apr 2021 16:59

We all seem to be forgetting one major fact, the U.K. and the USA agreed to protect the Ukraine... all of it, not a little here and a little there, but all of it in an agreement with the Ukraine for disarming their nuclear weapons, which at the time was the worlds third largest stockpile. We are obligated, like it or not.

Lordflasheart 19th Apr 2021 17:07

QRA from the Med ?
 
...

RAF F-35B Lightning stealth jets and Merlin submarine-hunting helicopters are to stand ready on the task group's flag ship, the carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth, to support the warships in the Black Sea should they be threatened by Russian warships, submarines or aircraft. HMS Queen Elizabeth has to stay in the Mediterranean because an international treaty prohibits aircraft carriers from entering the Black Sea.
I'd like to see the planned Head Office response time to a call for backup when a Kilo surfaces within range and gives them the bird.

Ready 10, loaded for bear - then ten days waiting for dip clearance. :E

LFH
...

West Coast 19th Apr 2021 21:40


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 11030783)
We all seem to be forgetting one major fact, the U.K. and the USA agreed to protect the Ukraine... all of it, not a little here and a little there, but all of it in an agreement with the Ukraine for disarming their nuclear weapons, which at the time was the worlds third largest stockpile. We are obligated, like it or not.

Agreed. Imagine China will watch closely what the response of the US will be. Potentially a indication of what aggression against Taiwan will yield them,

etudiant 19th Apr 2021 23:27


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 11030783)
We all seem to be forgetting one major fact, the U.K. and the USA agreed to protect the Ukraine... all of it, not a little here and a little there, but all of it in an agreement with the Ukraine for disarming their nuclear weapons, which at the time was the worlds third largest stockpile. We are obligated, like it or not.

That is a valid point, although I wonder how it applies in the case of a civil war. Iirc, these nukes, property of the Soviet Union, were transferred to Russia.

etudiant 19th Apr 2021 23:40


Originally Posted by West Coast (Post 11030883)
Agreed. Imagine China will watch closely what the response of the US will be. Potentially a indication of what aggression against Taiwan will yield them,

Judging by the rate of evolution of China's military capacity, defending Taiwan will be increasingly problematic. Taiwan could easily go nuclear as a deterrent, but that would precipitate the crisis that no one wants, so a slow boil is more likely. .
As pragmatic Chinese, I expect the Taiwanese to return to the motherland when the price is right, irrespective of the US's wishes. Given the technology treasures Taiwan offers, that price will be high.

tdracer 20th Apr 2021 01:27


Originally Posted by etudiant (Post 11030928)
Judging by the rate of evolution of China's military capacity, defending Taiwan will be increasingly problematic. Taiwan could easily go nuclear as a deterrent, but that would precipitate the crisis that no one wants, so a slow boil is more likely. .
As pragmatic Chinese, I expect the Taiwanese to return to the motherland when the price is right, irrespective of the US's wishes. Given the technology treasures Taiwan offers, that price will be high.

With Taiwan watching what's happened in Hong Kong, I respectfully disagree than Taiwan will ever voluntarily return - regardless of price.

tartare 20th Apr 2021 11:12

100,000 rooskis massed on the border.
That's.. ermm... quite a few soldiers for a mere show of force?
Or am I wrong...

Asturias56 20th Apr 2021 11:22

Soldiers? They're just friends, honest.................

fitliker 20th Apr 2021 12:45

Russia destroying mercenaries and vehicles in Syria last night . Who knows maybe they are serious about those red lines ?

ScotchEggLoophole 20th Apr 2021 13:33

[QUOTE=ORAC;11030538]West Coast, there are only 22 countries the UK has never invaded. I think that’s a record that will be hard to beat....

(It might be less than that - see link below reference Guatemala. I spent 3 happy months at Butcher radar in Belize back in 1979. The same may apply to a couple of the others as well)
QUOTE]
ORAC- that depends on how you classify 'invade'. The source book apparently does so thus:
  • any military presence in a country, including in support of the local power;
  • any naval actions in territorial waters, even against third parties;
  • military actions by non-state actors such as British mercenaries and pirates, assuming they had at least tacit consent by Britain.

A chap on Quora - search for (sorry- too virginal to post URLs) How-accurate-is-the-assertion-that-Britain-has-invaded-all-but-22-countries-in-the-world - has thrashed through the book and come up with some interesting and differing views on the actuality. Lots of links to the actions and quite a fascinating summary. Yes, we still made our presence known around the world that in today's light is unpalatable. I'm sure someone will now say 'still not good reading though....'

etudiant 20th Apr 2021 13:41


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 11030954)
With Taiwan watching what's happened in Hong Kong, I respectfully disagree than Taiwan will ever voluntarily return - regardless of price.

The Hang Sen Hong Kong stock market index, up about 30% since January, suggests a more positive view, even though it is still well down from its 2018 high.

Fliegenmong 20th Apr 2021 14:04

With action in Eastern Europe would not a play on Taiwan work at the some time? Russia & China are a lot closer now than before....War in Europe, the Pearl Harbour....War in Ukraine, then Taiwan?

etudiant 20th Apr 2021 17:56


Originally Posted by Fliegenmong (Post 11031257)
With action in Eastern Europe would not a play on Taiwan work at the some time? Russia & China are a lot closer now than before....War in Europe, the Pearl Harbour....War in Ukraine, then Taiwan?

Possibly true, but there has to be a plausible purpose for these countries, all of whom have catastrophic birth rates well below replacement value, to start killing each other's most fertile population segment.
Russia is reacting to the Ukraine leadership's decision to demonize that country's substantial Russian minority.
When the head of a state is on record as desiring the removal/disappearance of a substantial minority, it usually results in civil war or genocide. Thus far, we've only had a desultory civil war, probably the best possible result given the Kiev mindset. Russia seems desperate to impress the Ukraine leadership that a renewed assault on the Donbas enclaves would be suicidal.
Given that the tenuous legitimacy of the Russian regime rests on its claims of protecting the Russian community, I'd think that a wave of 'ethnic cleansing' in the Donbas would be fatal for the current Russian leadership. Presumably it would be replaced by something much nastier.
China and Taiwan both agree, there is but one China. The 'one country, two systems' formulation has kept the peace for several decades under the US military aegis, which is now looking rather threadbare. Still, the value of Taiwan is its people and the technical know how they have achieved. Those Chinese assets evaporate in a war, which Beijing understands quite well. Beijing can afford to wait for a decade, while moving to show Taiwan that the US relationship is less attractive than a full reintegration with the motherland.
It would be interesting to see whether India will step in to try to woo Taiwan, as that country offers even more potential than China.

highflyer40 20th Apr 2021 18:29


Originally Posted by etudiant (Post 11031385)
Possibly true, but there has to be a plausible purpose for these countries, all of whom have catastrophic birth rates well below replacement value, to start killing each other's most fertile population segment.
Russia is reacting to the Ukraine leadership's decision to demonize that country's substantial Russian minority.
When the head of a state is on record as desiring the removal/disappearance of a substantial minority, it usually results in civil war or genocide. Thus far, we've only had a desultory civil war, probably the best possible result given the Kiev mindset. Russia seems desperate to impress the Ukraine leadership that a renewed assault on the Donbass enclaves would be suicidal.
Given that the tenuous legitimacy of the Russian regime rests on its claims of protecting the Russian community, I'd think that a wave of 'ethnic cleansing' in the Donbass would be fatal for the current Russian leadership. Presumably it would be replaced by something much nastier.
China and Taiwan both agree, there is but one China. The 'one country, two systems' formulation has kept the peace for several decades under the US military aegis, which is now looking rather threadbare. Still, the value of Taiwan is its people and the technical know how they have achieved. Those Chinese assets evaporate in a war, which Beijing understands quite well. Beijing can afford to wait for a decade, while moving to show Taiwan that the US relationship is less attractive than a full reintegration with the motherland.
It would be interesting to see whether India will step in to try to woo Taiwan, as that country offers even more potential than China.

Have you ever been to Taiwan? The people would rather die than go back to being part of China. The problem is mainland China is also of the same mindset in reverse. They will do everything to reabsorb Taiwan. When that happens the rest of the world will make lots of noise but in the end do nothing.

etudiant 20th Apr 2021 21:56


Originally Posted by highflyer40 (Post 11031400)
Have you ever been to Taiwan? The people would rather die than go back to being part of China. The problem is mainland China is also of the same mindset in reverse. They will do everything to reabsorb Taiwan. When that happens the rest of the world will make lots of noise but in the end do nothing.

It may be that the Taiwanese would prefer to die rather than live under Xi's rule, but if so, they need to get a nuclear deterrent and make it public.
Otherwise, your forecast is likely correct.
I might add that there does not appear to be crushing anxiety in Taiwan, the news reports I've seen indicate the drought is getting more attention than the threat of a Chinese invasion.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.