General Atomics to operate SkyGuardian from RAF Waddington this summer
Plans to operate a pre-production standard version of what will be the Protector RG Mk1 in service have been announced on the RAF website, The RPAS will be used to conduct development and trials flying connected to its Detect and Avoid technology and refining "the requirements needed to fully integrate Protector operations into Waddington where the RPAS will operate alongside the based fixed wing aircraft".
It is planned to participate in Joint Warrior. https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles...n-this-summer/ What's the betting we get see some scare stories in the press? "US company flying secret pilotless bomber in crowded UK skies" etc. Or I am being too cynical |
Often wondered, why stick a cockpitesque bulge on a unmanned aircraft when surely they could make it more streamlined and incorporate the hardware it houses throughout the design. I take it C of G may be a factor, but it does seem to be a hang over from manned aircraft design.
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 10983428)
Often wondered, why stick a cockpitesque bulge on a unmanned aircraft when surely they could make it more streamlined and incorporate the hardware it houses throughout the design. I take it C of G may be a factor, but it does seem to be a hang over from manned aircraft design.
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 10983428)
Often wondered, why stick a cockpitesque bulge on a unmanned aircraft when surely they could make it more streamlined and incorporate the hardware it houses throughout the design. I take it C of G may be a factor, but it does seem to be a hang over from manned aircraft design.
Ugly looking thing. |
Interesting that the RAF is calling the thing Protector, a nice comfy name, instead of the more ominous Reaper or Predator.
|
Originally Posted by OldLurker
(Post 10983545)
Interesting that the RAF is calling the thing Protector, a nice comfy name, instead of the more ominous Reaper or Predator.
|
Ahh, but it allows it to potter around the U.K. while politicians can spout on that its
|
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 10983428)
Often wondered, why stick a cockpitesque bulge on a unmanned aircraft when surely they could make it more streamlined and incorporate the hardware it houses throughout the design. I take it C of G may be a factor, but it does seem to be a hang over from manned aircraft design.
Flat-panel antennae aren't quite up to the job yet, though they probably will be in five or fewer years |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 10983561)
Ahh, but it allows it to potter around the U.K. while politicians can spout on that its
|
Originally Posted by kiwi grey
(Post 10983695)
There's a steerable SATCOM antenna under there.
Flat-panel antennae aren't quite up to the job yet, though they probably will be in five or fewer years |
Trans Atlantic Hop RIAT 2018
Remember it’s maiden trans Atlantic hop in July 2018 just in time to appear at RIAT?? My pics below from static at the show.
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....135dfd054.jpeg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d689fe85f.jpeg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....67731eca9.jpeg Wondering if the protestors presence outside the fence will increase.... the spotters outside the fence and at the WAVE thankfully never encountered them. Though did read about one older lady who use to camp outside RAF Molesworth and then RAF Greenham Common protesting against GLCM deployments set up camp outside Waddo few years back. cheers |
Surprise, surprise Drone Wars are opposed to the operations but only seem to have interested the Lincolnite who picked up on the groups concerns over safety as "RAF Waddington has many homes, businesses and a school as near neighbours" :ugh:
https://thelincolnite.co.uk/2021/02/...af-waddington/ I may be wrong but the Drone Wars blog post appears to me to be implying that due to former CAS Sir Stephen Hillier being is its chair the CAA may bend its regulations to permit the operations. Seems to be some 2 + 2 = 5 going on. https://dronewars.net/2021/02/15/gen...us/#more-14094 |
(I realise this is redundant re a post above, but I thought I'd leave it for the sake of the hilarious NAB reference)
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 10983428)
Often wondered, why stick a cockpitesque bulge on a unmanned aircraft when surely they could make it more streamlined and incorporate the hardware it houses throughout the design. I take it C of G may be a factor, but it does seem to be a hang over from manned aircraft design.
What's more interesting is that satellite newsgathering trucks are increasingly starting to use a phased array antenna on top of the Transit van, which don't require such bulky hardware nor mechanical steering, and also maintains a lower profile in more ways than one. The military sometimes seems alarmingly behind the times these days. P |
Originally Posted by SLXOwft
(Post 10996221)
Surprise, surprise Drone Wars are opposed to the operations but only seem to have interested the Lincolnite who picked up on the groups concerns over safety as "RAF Waddington has many homes, businesses and a school as near neighbours" :ugh:
https://thelincolnite.co.uk/2021/02/...af-waddington/ I may be wrong but the Drone Wars blog post appears to me to be implying that due to former CAS Sir Stephen Hillier being is its chair the CAA may bend its regulations to permit the operations. Seems to be some 2 + 2 = 5 going on. https://dronewars.net/2021/02/15/gen...us/#more-14094 IG |
Originally Posted by Phil_R
(Post 10996703)
.........Note that it's been normal for broadcasters to encrypt their uplinks for at least twenty years.
Indeed we do. Not always though :ok: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:10. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.