Canberra overflights of the USSR
I understand the need for OpSec but the flights of 540 Sqn Canberras over Kapustin Yar are now a piece of history yet still officially denied by HM Gov. Seems such a pity that we can’t discuss it even 60 years later, the flight that was hit by 23mm cannon shells yet still photographed the objective and then continued on to Iran would be stirring stuff to read about.
For what it’s worth if any of the crews are reading this you have my absolute respect, especially the navs who found that launch site with nothing more than a pencil, a compass, and a stopwatch. Incredible feat really. |
Back in the early 60s as a schoolboy I went into the ASF hangar at Laarbruch, with my father who was OCASF, and saw a Canberra with the canopy painted white on top. This was presumably to reduce solar glare when flying at height. My father suggested that I ought not to have seen this aircraft and not to mention it. I have always wondered what it was and which sqn operated it, presumably not 540 which had disbanded by then. Can anybody enlighten me?
|
Originally Posted by bspatz
(Post 10565162)
Back in the early 60s as a schoolboy I went into the ASF hangar at Laarbruch, with my father who was OCASF, and saw a Canberra with the canopy painted white on top. This was presumably to reduce solar glare when flying at height. My father suggested that I ought not to have seen this aircraft and not to mention it. I have always wondered what it was and which sqn operated it, presumably not 540 which had disbanded by then. Can anybody enlighten me?
https://spyflight.co.uk/operations/ |
I'm sure there are people in the MoD who are still upset that the victory at Waterloo and Trafalgar were announced to the press..................
|
Originally Posted by bspatz
(Post 10565162)
Back in the early 60s as a schoolboy I went into the ASF hangar at Laarbruch, with my father who was OCASF, and saw a Canberra with the canopy painted white on top. This was presumably to reduce solar glare when flying at height. My father suggested that I ought not to have seen this aircraft and not to mention it. I have always wondered what it was and which sqn operated it, presumably not 540 which had disbanded by then. Can anybody enlighten me?
[IMG]http://www.simplyplanes.co.uk/images...quadron_42.jpg[IMG] https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....58ba977a4c.jpg |
There is quite a lengthy thread on here about this not long ago. Try a search. It included contributions from those involved. long before my time but I do remember people on 51 recalling the tensions of the crews prior to some missions from Watton. |
https://www.pprune.org/military-avia...ia+overflights here you go. I think this was the original thread |
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 10565439)
I'm sure there are people in the MoD who are still upset that the victory at Waterloo and Trafalgar were announced to the press..................
|
these things happen in the best run shops........ that's why email was invented...........
But I presume in Roman time sit was worse - it took weeks to get a message from Rome to Carlisle....... |
I am sure this is what I saw, so thanks for solving a query that has been at the back of my mind for some time
|
These Might Help...
I've read a couple pieces that touch on this...
Operation 'Robin' and the British overflight of Kapustin Yar: a historiographical note or Lashmar, Paul. Spy Flights of the Cold War. Stroud: Sutton Publishing, 1996. hope they are of use... |
Was reading through the original thread posted above - and surprised to see speculation that the PR Mk9 have flown as high as FL58!
What would the crew on those flights have worn - given aircraft was pressurised - just the Taylor helmet and the pressure jerkin - or would you have needed a full pressure suit given that time at altitude? |
I was only just watching this short video on the subject...
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:09. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.