|
USAF FY2020 Budget
$165.6B - up $10B on FY2019.
48 x F-35A - $4.9B 8 x F-15EX - $1.1B 12 x KC-46A 8 x MC-130J 12 x MQ-9 Reaper 1 x EC-37B Compass Call B-21 Program - $3B F-35 Block 4 Modernization Program - $794M Next Generation Air Dominance Program - including Gen 6 fighter - $1B (up from $430M in FY2019) T-X Trainer R&D - $348.5M Replacement Presidential Aircraft development - $576M https://www.defensenews.com/smr/fede...emerging-tech/ |
F-15X now expected to be bought over multiple years ahead to recapitalize F-15C/D fleet which now has major structural issues. More here:
F-15X Will Come In Two Variants, And No, It Won't Cost $100M Per Copy - The Drive |
NGAD must have nearly enough for a demonstrator...
|
Procuring new variants of a fighter that last rolled off the production line for USAF 33 years ago has to be a real admission of defeat in the procurement space. Inevitably people will lament that if we had to buy a legacy fighter why oh why couldn’t it be an upgraded F-22, ignoring the impossibility of that scenario of course. |
Probably the realization that you don't need a F22 for every mission.
|
Originally Posted by West Coast
(Post 10417750)
Probably the realization that you don't need a F22 for every mission.
-RP |
Originally Posted by Rhino power
(Post 10418494)
Or maybe you haven't got enough F-22s in the first place... :}
-RP |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 10418819)
And someone made sure there would be no more F-22s by destroying the tooling... I'm 99.9% sure the tooling and jigs for the F-22 were never destroyed, I'm sure I read somewhere they were stored, very securely, on an Army base? -RP |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 10418819)
Exactly. And someone made sure there would be no more F-22s by destroying the tooling. Should do that with F-15. |
The issue with F-22 isn't the jigs or tooling, it's the avionics and mission systems. They are all based on obsolete 1980s technologies and architectures which are difficult to acquire and support. The F-15 architecture has moved with the times for export customers so is, essentially, "off the peg". You could consider retrofitting F-35 avionics to the F-22 airframe but, to be honest, it's probably cheaper to go straight to the Gen 6 F-X concept and buy updated F-15s to increase combat mass to fill the gap in the interim….which, I guess, is the USAF's opinion too….
|
Originally Posted by Rhino power
(Post 10418983)
I'm 99.9% sure the tooling and jigs for the F-22 were never destroyed, I'm sure I read somewhere they were stored, very securely, on an Army base?
-RP |
Originally Posted by GlobalNav
(Post 10418819)
Exactly. And someone made sure there would be no more F-22s by destroying the tooling. Should do that with F-15. There are a few other articles as well that refute your assertion. If this and the other articles are to be believed, the jigs tooling and whatever else is needed is in storage at the Sierra Army Depot in California. |
Originally Posted by West Coast
(Post 10420687)
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mil...-line-is-dead/ There are a few other articles as well that refute your assertion. If this and the other articles are to be believed, the jigs tooling and whatever else is needed is in storage at the Sierra Army Depot in California. |
Makes me wonder what other aircraft tooling is still tucked away at remote bases. |
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
(Post 10415333)
$165.6B - up $10B on FY2019.
48 x F-35A - $4.9B 8 x F-15EX - $1.1B 12 x KC-46A 8 x MC-130J 12 x MQ-9 Reaper 1 x EC-37B Compass Call B-21 Program - $3B F-35 Block 4 Modernization Program - $794M Next Generation Air Dominance Program - including Gen 6 fighter - $1B (up from $430M in FY2019) T-X Trainer R&D - $348.5M Replacement Presidential Aircraft development - $576M https://www.defensenews.com/smr/fede...emerging-tech/ Cheers https://airforcesmonthly.keypublishi...Pppk-e9N_Ker4k |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:46. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.