PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Lockheed Martin propose stealthy tanker et al (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/616213-lockheed-martin-propose-stealthy-tanker-et-al.html)

chopper2004 10th Dec 2018 16:21

Lockheed Martin propose stealthy tanker et al
 
What with the Boeing KC-46 Pegasus , and MQ-25 being the biggish headlines for AAR, apparently L-M are not sitting this out. They are looking at stealth and unmanned air to air tanker concepts

Lockheed Martin Is Crafting New Stealth and Drone Tanker Concepts For The USAF - The Drive

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....b3f509993.jpeg

KenV 10th Dec 2018 17:34

Even assuming USAF releases an RFP for a stealthy tanker, Lockheed would have to beat the competition. They've lost the last three major competitions on cost and have already complained bitterly that they can't afford to submit low cost proposals the way Boeing has.. If that continues, they don't have a prayer of winning this one and all they've have are pretty artists renderings.

T28B 10th Dec 2018 17:47

(not as a mod)
They might want to first develop a stealth Herc to fit into that picture.

orca 10th Dec 2018 17:49

Or put the Truckie towline a little further away than the Gen 5 one.

Onceapilot 10th Dec 2018 18:12

I think that there is a place for a LO tanker (due to a Force-majeure of short legged LO FJ) but, it ain't gonna be VFM for Albert. FGS, where is this Stealthy tanker operating from to support carrier based F-35? Oh, Yes! I remember, from a land base! DOH!! :p

OAP

KenV 10th Dec 2018 18:18


Originally Posted by Onceapilot (Post 10332697)
.... where is this Stealthy tanker operating from to support carrier based F-35? Oh, Yes! I remember, from a land base! DOH!! :p

This is not that far feteched as it may sound. The P-8 (based on the land based 737) originally had an aerial tanker requirement. But that got killed when USAF cried foul and claimed it violated their exclusive turf. It's one of the reasons the MQ-25 was created. USN needed the tanking and USAF could not claim the MQ-25 violated their turf.

Onceapilot 10th Dec 2018 18:23

Hi Ken! Yep, those tankers are gonna have a ball on that ski-jump. :rolleyes:

OAP

Onceapilot 10th Dec 2018 18:25

Sorry, just a bit UK warcanoe-centric. :ouch:

OAP


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.