PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   RAF Start Talks on E-3D Replacement (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/609040-raf-start-talks-e-3d-replacement.html)

George K Lee 19th Jun 2018 23:23

Two radars mounted fore and aft is fine.

It's when you have one radar in the middle, connected to the nose and tail by waveguides like tree-roots....

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.gmf...64d0f68d7a.jpg

STATSMAN 20th Jun 2018 14:43

Nimrod AEW3
 
You could track an SR71 taking off from an USAF airfield in the east of England or was it that ice cream van, sorry DJ.

Davef68 20th Jun 2018 17:23

Hmm, competition. What serious rivals to the Wedgetail are there? Saab-Ericsson, IAI and Boeing E767. Or vapourware from Airbus, with attendant R&D risks

tdracer 20th Jun 2018 18:33


The Royal Air Force is in favour of buying between four and six planes from the US aerospace giant Boeing at a cost of £2 billion to £3 billion.
If they are really lucky, a couple billion pounds might cover the development costs of a new AWACS platform. Of course then they'd need another billion or two to actually produce functional aircraft.
There is something to be said for buying 'off the shelf' when practical.

Sook 4th Jul 2018 10:34

Looks like any announcement at Farnborough has used been cancelled.

UK must compete future surveillance aircraft procurement, parliament states

ORAC 4th Jul 2018 11:34

Badly worded headline - the text states the committee chairman has “requested” the government to hold a competitive tender.

The MoD and government has ignored all their other suggestions concerning defence - I see no reason to forecast any change in their attitude.

Davef68 4th Jul 2018 12:52


The committee also considers that a competition is particularly appropriate in this case, as there are viable alternatives available, which deserve to be given fair consideration
I wonder what they consider 'viable alternatives' ?

LincsFM 4th Jul 2018 14:11

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/the-...ce-the-sentry/

esa-aardvark 4th Jul 2018 14:19

Nimrod aew3
being on the edges at the time, I recall that a large part of the problem was
the GEC4080 computer, a bit pedestrian for the task. But it was made by GEC.
Lots of better, faster boxes available at the time.

TBM-Legend 5th Jul 2018 12:32

RAAF E-7A has worked real fine in the ME for a number of years. Considered by the Yanks to be a top piece of kit. One did a 14.3hr mission recently. Stick that in your E-3D hat!

DCThumb 5th Jul 2018 14:58


Originally Posted by Davef68 (Post 10188278)
I wonder what they consider 'viable alternatives' ?

Saab Globaleye?

Proven mission system - tick

Commonality with Sentinel - tick

Multi-role - tick

UK jobs (built by marshalls) - tick

cokecan 5th Jul 2018 15:44


Originally Posted by DCThumb (Post 10189355)
Saab Globaleye?

Proven mission system - tick

Commonality with Sentinel - tick

Multi-role - tick

UK jobs (built by marshalls) - tick

genuine question: for how long can it sit 200 miles north of the Faeroes without refueling? how many different assets can it talk to at the same time?

is it a replacement for E-3, or just an aeroplane with a radar - coz they aren't the same thing....

DCThumb 5th Jul 2018 16:24

I have no idea whether it is an E3 replacement or an aeroplane with radar, I was just pointing out what the select committee might think is a viable alternative.

I do know that endurance without refuelling will be significantly greater than wedgetail - and the design work for a probe was completed for Sentinel!



ORAC 5th Jul 2018 18:48

Design work for a probe on aircraft with an underslung canoe is totally different to one for an airframe with a very large radar array on top of the fuselage....

Reading reports the original Saab radar had a maximum range of about 180nm. The new ER version supposedly has a range 70%, but it only flew for the first time this year, so not trusted in service. It apparently has 5 operator positions, but size wise the Shackleton would have been commodious. If I wanted 12+ endurance I’d want a rest area and room for expansion.

rjtjrt 5th Jul 2018 20:37


Originally Posted by DCThumb (Post 10189355)
Saab Globaleye?

Proven mission system - tick

Commonality with Sentinel - tick

Multi-role - tick

UK jobs (built by marshalls) - tick

Number of work stations/consoles?


caped crusader 5th Jul 2018 22:05

Whilst design work for a probe on Sentinel was completed my understanding is that the fitting of a probe was considered high risk and Sentinel entered into service without an AAR capability.

gelert1234 5th Jul 2018 22:48


Originally Posted by DCThumb (Post 10189428)
I have no idea whether it is an E3 replacement or an aeroplane with radar, I was just pointing out what the select committee might think is a viable alternative.

I do know that endurance without refuelling will be significantly greater than wedgetail - and the design work for a probe was completed for Sentinel!



I don’t think you can quote the basic aircraft figures for a Global 6000 and apply them to GlobalEye, once you add all the military payload, it won’t operate at the height listed and it certainly won’t have the endurance.

gelert1234 5th Jul 2018 22:56


Originally Posted by DCThumb (Post 10189355)
Saab Globaleye?

Proven mission system - tick

Commonality with Sentinel - tick

Multi-role - tick

UK jobs (built by marshalls) - tick


When you say proven mission system, can you qualify that with recent operational experience? I believe the E-7 has been extremely successful during OKRA and recent Red Flag exercises, not sure GlobalEye has participated in anything? Suitable for in-border tasking, but not an expeditionary asset, not enough operators and limited SWAP-C for the upgrades.

DCThumb 6th Jul 2018 07:04


Originally Posted by caped crusader (Post 10189711)
Whilst design work for a probe on Sentinel was completed my understanding is that the fitting of a probe was considered high risk and Sentinel entered into service without an AAR capability.

All the probe work was complete, it was only deleted to save money (circa £60m as I recall)

The plain facts were, with no facility for extra crew or rest facilities provisioned, there was little point in flying for longer than 12 hours on Sentinel.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:20.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.