![]() |
Originally Posted by Davef68
(Post 11150716)
They might deny it publicly, but I think Boeing is still a dirty word in the Canadian Govt after the A220 farago
|
Originally Posted by rattman
(Post 11150976)
Maybe its only buy a small amount like 20 or so and allow themselves to kick the can down the street again for another couple of years
|
Originally Posted by henra
(Post 11151171)
Very good point!
Typhoon is an excellent Airframe (especially A2A). It's supremely fast, powerful and agile. With AESA, Meteor and IRIS/ASRAAM a mighty Air Superiority platform that can sweep the airspace. On the other hand the Product Support and continued development is rather lackluster compared to F-35 or even Rafale. A2G Typhoon is still behind Tornado in many cpabilities and it is not VLO to compensate for this. There are no 'cool' additions exactly as you mentioned with Loyal wingman&Company. At the same time Typhoon and Rafale are amongst the very most expensive Fighter aircraft on the current market. Honestly, I also don't see big chances in any of the remaining competitions, being it Canada or Finland. And I can't even really blame them. |
Originally Posted by Foghorn Leghorn
(Post 11151419)
I’m intrigued to know how Typhoon is still behind Tornado in air to surface capabilities?
|
Originally Posted by Petit-Lion
(Post 11151415)
Can already kicked. Canada is buying second-hand Hornets from Australia "for parts".
Yes but 20-30 gripens would allow the can to be kicked even further down the road. The 25 ex RAAF hornets of which 7 are for parts gets you down <10 years, 20ish gripens might get you down the road for 10 + years and still be usable after they eventually select the F-35 which we all know they will have to at some stage |
Rattman
Buying 20 Gripens is not a case of kicking the can down the road. It would effectively be stomping on the can and throwing it on the bin.
Firstly an interim bit of new aircraft would take up all the money that might otherwise be available to buy F35. Secondly (and it’s the aspect that politicians never seem to appreciate fully) the RCAF simply couldn’t provide the manning to do it. If you are suggesting that Gripen work alongside the remaining Hornets (which I guess you are because 20 jets could not meet the RCAF taskings) then you would need two fleets of pilots/engineers etc. Unless something has drastically changed in Canada, that just isn’t going to happen. The purchase of the RAAF jets was to recognise the fact that they could augment the knackered fleet of RCAF jets without making two fleets. Even an interim Super Hornet purchase would have created two fleets. Anyway, I may be wrong but with the competitors left in the process F35 is the inevitable choice. I just cannot wait to see the kicking that Justin will get in the press and maybe the polls. BV |
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
(Post 11151492)
Buying 20 Gripens is not a case of kicking the can down the road. It would effectively be stomping on the can and throwing it on the bin.
He will get his headlines and photo ops when the first plane is delivered, meanwhile the RCAF get more screwed |
rattman
I love your blue-sky thinking but I think we’ll agree to disagree on its’ likelihood.
Even Justin would struggle to put a positive spin on that plan. BV |
So plus points about the Gripen:
Gripen serviceability will be better – two conscripts and a screwdriver keep it flying – F-35 not so much. Its a Saab aircraft so designed to fly from austere places – F-35 I imgine is more limited in places you would want to deploy to. Gripen will be cheap to own, fly and upgrade – F-35 will be on the other end of the spectrum Canada’s tankers have hose and drogue – surely no air force would be stupid enough to buy airplanes their tankers can’t refuel?? Oh :) US units will be queuing up to do DACT with Canadian Gripens - - not so with F-35. As most of the western world will fly F-35 – if Canada buys Gripen it will bring something different to the mix when they deploy. Gripen is not American - which my be a big plus for some politicians. On the flip side – LM use lots of $’s to be persuasive with the right people - Saab dont |
TR The chosen RCAF tanker (MRTT) has boom and wing pods-pity we didn’t think ahead!
|
Thanks - Didn't know the tankers were due to be replaced too.
|
The perfect plane for Canada is the Rafale F4, all others than the Rafale is just a wast of money.
|
Kimono
Might we infer from your sales pitch that you are French per chance?
BV |
Originally Posted by kimono1950
(Post 11151711)
The perfect plane for Canada is the Rafale F4, all others than the Rafale is just a wast of money.
|
Originally Posted by kimono1950
(Post 11151711)
The perfect plane for Canada is the Rafale F4, all others than the Rafale is just a wast of money.
|
Originally Posted by typerated
(Post 11151533)
On the flip side – LM use lots of $’s to be persuasive with the right people - Saab dont ……yes I know, BAE had som part in that mess…… |
It will all come down to politicians trying to make it look like they are making a reasoned decision to buy the aircraft that was previously cancelled.
|
Originally Posted by Foghorn Leghorn
(Post 11151419)
I’m intrigued to know how Typhoon is still behind Tornado in air to surface capabilities?
|
Originally Posted by henra
(Post 11152022)
No HARM/ALARM, no Kormoran/Sea Eagle. Currently the JDAM (GBU-38/54) is not yet fully implemented.
|
I suppose you could argue it has no PW3 or raptor pod?
About the only difference I can think of. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. |
Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.