PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Merlin HM2 / Crowsnest (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/595236-merlin-hm2-crowsnest.html)

163627 29th May 2017 13:00

Merlin HM2 / Crowsnest
 
I've just finished a pleasant BH lunchtime reading an interesting article on the Merlin HM2 / Crowsnest combination, which if it does as it says on the tin should be a significant enhancement over the current capability. However, I've just done a rough calculation on what I know of present and future tasks and to me the numbers don't add up once an additional 6 - 9 airframes are deployed on board one of the HMS Queen Elizabeth class. Is there a cunning plan to increase the numbers in the fleet above thirty or will some current "important" tasking get ditched? Finally, although I can see the logic of all the airframes being Crowsnest capable I just cannot invesage one having its role equipment changed once embarked and deployed?

Mechta 29th May 2017 13:07

A while back LM were talking about having the option to operate Crowsnest unmanned. Has that been dropped, or is it still on the cards?

Heathrow Harry 29th May 2017 18:02

I suspect a lot of capabilities will be downgraded/cancelled once we try and build a functioning UK Carrier Battle Group

It will stretch ships, aircraft personnel and cash beyond the limit

alfred_the_great 30th May 2017 08:43


Originally Posted by 163627 (Post 9786279)
I've just finished a pleasant BH lunchtime reading an interesting article on the Merlin HM2 / Crowsnest combination, which if it does as it says on the tin should be a significant enhancement over the current capability. However, I've just done a rough calculation on what I know of present and future tasks and to me the numbers don't add up once an additional 6 - 9 airframes are deployed on board one of the HMS Queen Elizabeth class. Is there a cunning plan to increase the numbers in the fleet above thirty or will some current "important" tasking get ditched? Finally, although I can see the logic of all the airframes being Crowsnest capable I just cannot invesage one having its role equipment changed once embarked and deployed?

Tasks will have to be stopped.

tucumseh 30th May 2017 09:44


if it does as it says on the tin should be a significant enhancement over the current capability
Over 27 years after many of the ASaC Mk7 equipment specs were written, I should hope so!

ORAC 30th May 2017 20:43

http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/u...RODPIC-694.jpg

tucumseh 31st May 2017 04:43

Nice one ORAC. Eye-wateringly expensive, as was avionics of the day! Interestingly, the Critical Design Review for the new radar transmitter was held that month, on the 22nd, the day Maggie resigned.

Martin the Martian 7th Jun 2017 10:38

I've heard a few mutterings (of the my friend's brother's best mate kind) recently about the Navy looking at a single Merlin MOB and combining both fleets. With MDMF at Culdrose and several empty hangars it would make some sense to put the CHF in there from a logistics point of view, but on the other hand could the pingers be accommodated at Yeovilton?

Any thoughts?

polyglory 7th Jun 2017 17:22

Cats and traps on the Carriers would have sorted a hell of a lot out and not just being type bound one one aircraft/Helo

HEDP 7th Jun 2017 19:38

Surely there will be too many Apaches accommodated at Yeovilton once the Merlins consolidate at Culdrose.....


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.