As it is the Royal Air Force it seems the Royal family have priority.
|
Easy answer. Charles was deputising for the Queen, who is HEAD OF STATE. The Prime Minister is HEAD OF GOVERNMENT, appointed by HEAD OF STATE.
|
Looking at the interior of said B757, who would choose the crappy airline interior Voyager!!
|
The FO are too busy `giving `Aid` to the despots of the World.. |
'Mrs May Airlines'...? 'FlyMayBe', shurely?
|
Charles should live by the green credentials he preaches to anyone who will listen, and go round Europe by train.
|
Originally Posted by Martin the Martian
(Post 9731203)
Charles and Camilla are on a European tour, so why couldn't they use one of the Northolt 146s?
Maybe Chas is banned from those? previous and all that? :-) |
You can't win on this site; people kick off at PMs/Royals for using RAF as their personal taxi service and then do likewise when they save money by using chartered civilian services!
|
"..he should go by train". Right, wearing a suit from oxfam too, I suppose? It's hard to see what that would achieve beyond making our country look shambling and disorganised in the eyes of the world
|
Charles is on state business. The Daily Fail journos can stick themselves up their own backsides. May is not one of us, was one of us, never will be one of us and the likes of her and the others politicians, both left and right side, have messed things up so badly the armed forces of the UK have got stiffed. Remember that. Rant over and all I will say on the matter.
|
How about a compromise.....
May had her way with the Voyager and gave Charlie & Cammy a lift. Dumped them off somewhere in Europe....Eindhoven will do....and then May with Voyager continue to Saudi Arabia Then May can collect Charlie & Cammy on the way back Job done.....easy peasy with a little hindsight ;) |
Or b) they do what they did after consultation with all relevant parties and produce a solution that all, including the bean counters who would have had to shell out for contract air, are happy with. Or we can all sit here in hindsight and give a dozen options that would have bedn 'better'...
|
There is an article in today's Times about when HRH went to the US in 2007 to accept an environmental leadership award with Al Gore. In view of the nature of the occasion he decided it would be better to travel on a scheduled flight with his entourage of 14. Apparently he complained that he found the first class seats "incredibly uncomfortable".
What he would have thought if he had flown steerage with the plebs can only be imagined! Right, wearing a suit from oxfam too, I suppose? |
Originally Posted by Herod
(Post 9731323)
Easy answer. Charles was deputising for the Queen, who is HEAD OF STATE. The Prime Minister is HEAD OF GOVERNMENT, appointed by HEAD OF STATE.
|
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 9734055)
Has 32 (The Royal) Sqdn disbanded? Surely a '146 would have been better suited for a short haul European tour leaving the PM the use of the Voyager.
|
Originally Posted by chevvron
(Post 9734055)
Has 32 (The Royal) Sqdn disbanded? Surely a '146 would have been better suited for a short haul European tour leaving the PM the use of the Voyager.
|
Ascoteer - am I reading your post correctly - the Royal family not entitled to fly in "The Royal" Squadron aircraft, or am I missing something?or
|
Originally Posted by Wander00
(Post 9734927)
Ascoteer - am I reading your post correctly - the Royal family not entitled to fly in "The Royal" Squadron aircraft, or am I missing something?or
|
aah, OK. Thanks
|
They're entitled, they just have to pay 'full cost', which is astronomical. All to do with Department For Transport grants to the Royal Travel Office. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.