PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Random Recollection Needs Scratching... (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/589150-random-recollection-needs-scratching.html)

charliegolf 5th Jan 2017 11:21

Random Recollection Needs Scratching...
 
Parachute cord- how strong was it, allegedly? The CSROs (and I was one!) used to quote a figure, but I can't recall it. Was it 300lbs?

CG

NutLoose 5th Jan 2017 11:33

Up to 550 lbs (249.48 kg)

US Army Mil-Spec Paracord 550 Para Cord Military Camping Paracute Bivi Rope 15m | eBay

charliegolf 5th Jan 2017 11:36

Cheers Nutty. You saddo!

Kiddin, Ta.

CG

NutLoose 5th Jan 2017 11:38

Though there is paracord and there is paracord, if you check evilbay some are not as strong.

UK stuff was possibly less


This really is the best Paracord in the World. We import hundreds of thousands of feet every month from a top US manufacturer and it is a real cut above British Cord.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/550-PARACO...wAAOxye2lSUuNc

albatross 5th Jan 2017 13:42

We always called it 550 cord.
there was also a breaking strength for the individual threads inside.
Can not recall what it was ...we used it rigging static line parachute rigs. 80-100 lbs? perhaps less. Long time ago.

Unfortunately there are a lot of products on the market that call themselves parachute cord. While they look like it they are not.

I also recall the parachutes we started jumping with were made by ( I kid not ) the CHEEPO Parachute Co. - a real convidence builder. "OK Who's first?" "crickets."

Wander00 5th Jan 2017 13:45

And the next arcane question is......

Pontius Navigator 5th Jan 2017 13:59

Remember, in days of yore when the Service kit was the best and civilian kit was not as good.

Was that ever true?

charliegolf 5th Jan 2017 17:21


And the next arcane question is......
Why do people ask smart questions on threads they don't want to contribute to?:E

CG

Pontius Navigator 5th Jan 2017 17:42

CG, were you shown how to break para cord with the back of a Wilkie knife.

Can't remember the MACR's name but he pull the line almost bar taut then one swift blow and it snapped.

charliegolf 5th Jan 2017 18:48

PN, yes I do remember that clearly. Demo'd it many times to AAITC and Nav studes at Finningly. I was Hill Safety Officer at 6FTS for a bit.

CG

Like This - Do That 6th Jan 2017 01:04

I can "out sad" Nutloose ....

Type III Nylon cord breaking strain 550 lb. Comes in a roll weighing 5lb and has NSN 4020-00-246-0688.

Once a rockdropper, always a rockdropper I guess ....

ian16th 6th Jan 2017 10:34


Remember, in days of yore when the Service kit was the best and civilian kit was not as good.

Was that ever true?
Definitely true about RAF towels!

When we got married and my new boss discovered the quality of the standard RAF issue towel, I was ordered to Clothing Stores to acquire more.

Another area of good quality and function, but not style was MQ furniture and accouterments. In particular kitchen kit.

teeteringhead 6th Jan 2017 10:45


CG, were you shown how to break para cord with the back of a Wilkie knife.
Was also once shown how to do it by friction!

[Needs 4 hands] 2 hands hold the cord taut, other 2 loop another bit of cord twice over it and pull both ends - left right left right like a bodging lathe - and miraculously it breaks/burns/melts.

(conscious the description is not good, but I know what I mean!)

charliegolf 6th Jan 2017 10:59

Teeters, I don't remember that one (well I think I don't!), but the description was perfectly clear!

I ask ed the Q because of this...

Dangling skier rescued from Utah chair-lift - BBC News

... and a comment on another thread along the lines, "That must be some seriously strong paracord..."

CG

Pontius Navigator 6th Jan 2017 13:01

Ian16th, of course. Aircrew watches another as many didn't even have one
Same with drawers, cotton, cellular or some such as underpants were also novel to some.

At least one pair of my second set of black socks lasted 40 years.

Arclite01 6th Jan 2017 16:34

Aircrew socks

I'm currently wearing a pair that were issued in 1993. A bit threadbare now but still going......................

and actually an aircrew Tshirt that's doing OK - very dark green though - not like the current issue....................

Arc

Pontius Navigator 6th Jan 2017 17:02

Arclite, definitely the earlier white socks, ribbed and plain wool, wore out quickly and shrank and dried slowly.

The wool blue aircrew shirt was vastly superior to the 'smarter' green polo replacement which inherited to problems of the white socks.

Cornish Jack 7th Jan 2017 11:45

"The wool blue aircrew shirt was vastly superior"
When they were first introduced they were supplied by Van Heusen and were super quality. Needless to say some bean counter decided that such quality was too much for us and the contract was passed on to Faulats of Belfast. The turnover of shirts became a flood. One wash and the shirt became 3 sizes smaller!! Even worse, I was issued with a set of 3 in which the collars were made from two different material batches, joined in the middle!!:eek: The results from those in the wash were extraordinary - two different shrinkage rates. Eventually, even the b-cs got the message and they improved but never as good as the original.:sad:

Royalistflyer 7th Jan 2017 15:29

I remember my brother (also in the mob) handed his (original issue) shirt to a Chinese tailor in Hong Kong and ordered a set - got them back, meticulous copies beautifully made - lasted for years.

Pontius Navigator 7th Jan 2017 19:00

CJ, like the cold weather gauntlets. Very comfortable and warm but issued left and right and from different contracts and leathers.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.