PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   B-52H loses engine (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/589123-b-52h-loses-engine.html)

jmjdriver1995 5th Jan 2017 03:33

B-52H loses engine
 
A USAF B-52H BUFF dropped one of its TF-33 engines Wednesday about 25 miles from Minot AFB, North Dakota. The aircraft recovered safely at the base on the remaining 7 engines. The AWOL engine was later located by a UH-1N Huey searching the area. An accident investigation will undoubtedly be initiated to determine why this happened.

West Coast 5th Jan 2017 04:00

The dreaded 7 engine approach...

It had to be said.

Airbubba 5th Jan 2017 04:14


Originally Posted by West Coast (Post 9630350)
The dreaded 7 engine approach...

They've even done the five engine approach :eek::


ENGINE QUITS, 2 FALL OFF - BUT B-52 DOES FINE

Published: Aug. 9, 1995 12:00 a.m.

One engine failed and two fell off a B-52 bomber during a training mission, forcing the crew to circle for more than six hours before landing safely early Wednesday on five of its eight engines.

A pod holding two engines dropped off and landed in a soybean field near Bossier City at about 6 p.m. Tuesday, shortly after takeoff, Barksdale Air Force Base Tech Sgt. Howard Smith said.The generator in a third engine had failed shortly before that. The plane could land safely with as few as two, he said.

"Everything went off without a hitch," said Lt. Jeff Glenn, spokesman for the 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale, where the bomber was stationed.

The crew circled to use up fuel because the 35-year-old plane does not have a system to jettison its fuel and cannot land safely if plane and fuel weigh a total of more than 260,000 pounds, Smith said.

The plane itself weighs 185,000 pounds.
ENGINE QUITS, 2 FALL OFF - BUT B-52 DOES FINE | Deseret News

Rick777 5th Jan 2017 05:02

I know a guy who flew a 12 hour ORI mission with 6 running most of the time.I guess there is a good reason for all those engines.

Kobus Dune 5th Jan 2017 05:24

Like Hillary, falling apart. Time to enjoy retirement for them.

ORAC 5th Jan 2017 06:21

B-52 Engine-out Recovery
 
No, really.........

Engine Drops Out of B-52 During Training at Minot Air Force Base

MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, N.D. — An engine dropped out of a B-52 bomber during a training flight on Wednesday, the Air Force has confirmed following questions from Defense News.

Because the B-52 runs on eight Pratt & Whitney TF33-P-3/103 turbofan engines, pilots were able to land the aircraft safely without any injury to the five personnel on board. The Air Force has since dispatched a UH-1N Huey helicopter to recover engine debris, which was found located in an unpopulated area about 25 nautical miles northeast of Minot Air Force Base, an Air Force spokesman said in a statement.

There were no weapons onboard the B-52, which belongs to Minot Air Force Base's 5th Bomb Wing and was conducting a training mission, he said.......

ATC Watcher 5th Jan 2017 06:38


The plane could land safely with as few as two, he said.
Maintain altitude on 2 engines i.e. 25% of its max power ? that's impressive .
Question for those in the know here :Could you maintain altitude on one engine on a A340 or a 747 ?

Bergerie1 5th Jan 2017 06:47

ATC Watcher, NO

Airclues 5th Jan 2017 07:11


Could you maintain altitude on one engine on a A340 or a 747 ?
On 2nd May 1988 United Airlines 747-100 Flight 97 landed at Tokyo on one engine. However, the third engine failed on the approach, so it's unlikely that it would have been able to maintain altitude.

ORAC 5th Jan 2017 07:16

He said it could land safely on 2 - not maintain altitude. A modulated descent to ensure the point at which you reach the ground is a runway is not he same as flying straight and level..

Red Line Entry 5th Jan 2017 07:18

Ah, the dreaded 7-engine recovery...

DaveReidUK 5th Jan 2017 07:27


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 9630436)
He said it could land safely on 2 - not maintain altitude.

Sounds reasonable, given that we've seen an A330 and a 767 landing on zero engines, though that trick's probably not a good idea in a BUFF. :O

Pontius Navigator 5th Jan 2017 08:03

"Standby your score Sir"

ATC Watcher 5th Jan 2017 08:35

ORAC

He said it could land safely on 2 - not maintain altitude. A modulated descent to ensure the point at which you reach the ground is a runway is not he same as flying straight and level..
Well what is the point of saying that then? , any aircraft can glide and land without any power. But to make a normal IFR approach you would need to be able to maintain altitude at some point(s) . That is what I understand by " landing safely " but probably just PR words.

Sidestick_n_Rudder 5th Jan 2017 08:43

"Losing an engine" now has a completely new meaning...:}

DaveReidUK 5th Jan 2017 08:52


Originally Posted by ATC Watcher (Post 9630510)
Well what is the point of saying that then?

I have no idea.

Given that it's a quote from more than 20 years ago, he's probably forgotten why he said it by now.

Kulverstukas 5th Jan 2017 09:07


Like Hillary, falling apart. Time to enjoy retirement for them.
Is it yet confirmed that Putin hacked engine mount? :hmm:

ORAC 5th Jan 2017 09:14

I am reminded of the C-141 out of Mildenhall which declared an emergency out over the Atlantic north of Ireland and turned back for Mildenhall requesting a decent to FL310, then FL280, then FL 220....

The controller eventually asked politely what level he wished to descend to.

"I don't know sir", replied the pilot, "we've lost 2 engines and I'll let you know when we stop".

NutLoose 5th Jan 2017 09:28

As it "fell" free, bearing in mind it would still have a fair amount of fuel in its fuel system and would be burning and turning, I bet it out accelerated the B52 it was hauling along once freed from that onerous burden.

Surprised the crew never saw it shoot past like some demented pod racer from Star Wars.:E

Pontius Navigator 5th Jan 2017 09:40

After Nutty's post I had a little brain spark then remembered:

"Captain - Radar, ASV has gone off"

This after the radar was knocked off flying very low over the Med.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.