PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   UK took part in strike that killed Syrian soldiers (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/584645-uk-took-part-strike-killed-syrian-soldiers.html)

flyhardmo 19th Sep 2016 15:01

UK took part in strike that killed Syrian soldiers
 
British aircraft took part in air strike that killed dozens of Syrian soldiers, Ministry of Defence confirms | The Independent

What are the legalities involved here? This involvement isn't sanctioned by the UN. Would Syria have the right to appeal or ask the UN to expel US and UK forces?

Lonewolf_50 19th Sep 2016 15:14

Who on the UNSCR will vote to take such action? (Expel US and UK in areas where the Syrian government has No control and has more or less ceded sovereignty as part of its five year long civil war with a variety of factions trying to toss out the Assad regime ...) Oh, wait, I am pretty sure that there are two members on the UNSCR who won't. Fail.


The Syrian government can file a protest. If they have not already, I suspect that they will. If they file it in the GA they'll at least get some PR/Propaganda/sentiment points with people sympathetic to their cause.

Just curious: do you understand how the UN really works, or are you not familiar with its actual function when it comes to collective security activity? When it comes to expelling one group of folks from a territory, you might wish to review three cases:
1. South Korea. (more or less successful, with side effects)
2. Kuwait. (Successful)
3. Bosnia. (Unsuccessful when it was the UN alone, successful when a regional collective security organization, NATO, decided to act and tell the UN Dual Key RoE twits to take a hike).


In each case, the involvement of the UNSCR, and in particular its permanent members, had a significant influence on what action the UN did, or did not, take.

A_Van 19th Sep 2016 16:21

That's war and things happen. I did not read the exact statement of the US representatives, but even in the Russian media it was said that they expressed regrets, if not apologies. IMHO, that's more than enough in this particular situation, and the others in the US-led coalition may not elaborate more as they were obviouly getting the target information from US.


Syrian government can file the protest, and likely will, otherwise it would lose the "remainders of its face". But it does not control a significant part of its territory and better shut up letting the others wipe the garbage out of their territory.


UN is toothless, and the only thing that really matters is to make real forces operating in this filed (read, US/NATO and Russia) talk to each other and coordinate their activities. Russia is likely having better ISR as they are operating in Syria (i.e. not coming from Iraq like the coalition does) and Syrian land forces (who are reporting to them) can obviously better locate small Daeash groups than UAVs and sats. The coalition has more hi-pres weapons on the theatre, so there might be a place for "synergy".


There were some signs of hope that such a coordination plan was being worked out not long ago, but it was not disclosed and thus it's difficult to judge. I wonder why it is kept in confidence. Were there anything about kurds that would make Erdogan angry (which neither Russia, nor US are interested in)?

racedo 19th Sep 2016 17:35

Has HoC approved use of RAF in Syria ?

Timelord 19th Sep 2016 18:43


Originally Posted by racedo (Post 9513071)
Has HoC approved use of RAF in Syria ?

Yes (min 10 characters) Yes

ShotOne 19th Sep 2016 18:51

Legalities aside, the Syrian troops killed were fighting OUR enemies and some were reportedly crucified in the IS attack enabled by our air strikes. No, there's not much the UN or anyone else are about to do about it but it's still a good day for IS. Why would our tactical picture have been so much less accurate than that of the Russians who called a halt?

Lonewolf_50 19th Sep 2016 19:55

@ShotOne: fog of war? It happens even in this day and age.


Anyone who tells you differently is either lying, or trying to sell you something. (Possibly both)

taxydual 19th Sep 2016 19:58

The shyster lawyers will be rubbing their hands.

TBM-Legend 19th Sep 2016 23:04

Some 15,000 French civilians killed on or about D-Day. Collateral damage was expected. They didn't cancel Operation Overlord because of this..

RAAF is in headlines here about the Syrian event

AreOut 19th Sep 2016 23:28

there were 2 F16s and 2 A10s (only used by USAF) in the action

now Denmark, UK and Australia accept responsibility for two possible planes, something stinks big time here

flyhardmo 20th Sep 2016 00:20

Thanks Lonewolf.

I understand how the UN works or in reality doesn't work. I also understand the double standard applied by the permanent UNSC members which from your reply makes the whole UN a complete farce.

Fog of war I don't think so. It's no secret the US and its coalition is to over throw the current Syrian government. They have supplied training and weapons to the opposition groups. This is not a blue on blue situation.



Some 15,000 French civilians killed on or about D-Day. Collateral damage was expected. They didn't cancel Operation Overlord because of this..
That was a different era when carpet bombing of cities was accepted by all sides.

TEEEJ 20th Sep 2016 03:52


Originally Posted by AreOut (Post 9513355)
there were 2 F16s and 2 A10s (only used by USAF) in the action

now Denmark, UK and Australia accept responsibility for two possible planes, something stinks big time here

The F-16s were Danish. A-10s US. Reaper UK. Possibly the Australian assets were a KC-30A and/or E-7A Wedgetail?


“Two Danish F-16s participated along with other nations’ aircraft in these attacks. The attack was immediately stopped when a report from the Russian side said that a Syrian military position had been hit,” the statement read.
Danish F-16s part of attack that allegedly hit Syrian forces - The Local

serf 20th Sep 2016 04:56

And the JTACs?

ShotOne 20th Sep 2016 07:10

Getting at least four different air forces together must have involved advanced coordination. We have sensors which can identify a particular individual and follow his daily routine. Trotting out a phrase like "fog of war" doesn't explain it. Wasn't there supposed to be a truce (now comprehensively shattered!) in place, anyhow?

Martin the Martian 20th Sep 2016 12:03

Well, looks like the right to moral indignation has been lost.

Syria conflict: UN suspends all aid after convoy hit - BBC News

TEEEJ 20th Sep 2016 15:51

ShotOne wrote


Wasn't there supposed to be a truce (now comprehensively shattered!) in place, anyhow?
The truce didn't cover ISIS and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham.


Syria ceasefire - Parties - Assad regime and some opposition, but not ISIS and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (Previously known as al Nusra Front)
Syrian ceasefire: Is it all over after aid convoy strike? - CNN.com

Wander00 20th Sep 2016 18:22

Use of barrel bombs (allegedly) against the convoy seems to point the finger

Lonewolf_50 21st Sep 2016 02:20

@flyhardmo:


EDIT: -deleted my noise_unneeded carping.


I just agree with you that it's not in the class of "blue on blue" -- given the Crayola Crayon box of colors with all of the different fighting factions in that area, I am not sure how to color code it.

Beyond that, as a career military man, if you for one minute think that anyone is immune to the fog of war, in the year 2016, then you may be buying into too much propaganda from the USAF shills and a wide variety of arms and systems salesmen. The adverts don't tell the whole story.

It's alive and well, the fog of war, all electric gizmos considered.


@Shot One. You know better, and yes, it's alive and well as of this morning. It takes so little to create confusion.


EDIT to add: coordination between the Russians and the West has had some effort put into it, I am unaware of any coordination attempts between the West and Syria even though in some areas we are after the same faction, and in other areas the West is supporting a faction that is fighting the Syrians.


The opportunity for confusion abounds. The problem with "who to support and who to bomb" amplifies it. (Heck, it's hard enough to keep it clean when there is just one enemy).

Wander00 21st Sep 2016 08:26

Now on BBC claim by US that Russian aircraft targeted the convoy. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said

DroneDog 21st Sep 2016 08:35

I watched the American UN ambassador on TV and her sheer contempt for the 60 odd soldiers killed. A 3-second response was like " yes sure **** happens".

But she was much more concerned and outraged at the Russians for daring to challenge the US involvement in the event.

NutLoose 21st Sep 2016 09:24

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...yria-us-russia

DroneDog 21st Sep 2016 09:47

The problem I have is that if you watch Live Leak the Syrian section you will see the Syrian rebels / ISIS seem to have unlimited supplies of the latest US anti-tank missiles. I can't find them anywhere on eBay so where are they buying these from and what happens if a few turn up in the west, a lot more punch than a pressure cooker.

Lonewolf_50 21st Sep 2016 13:56

@DroneDog: I think we discussed this on this very forum a few years back when the Iraqi army ran away from a fight in north/central Iraq (Mosul area?) and left quite a bit of kit lying about for the Daesh sorts to pick up at their leisure. Won't comment on other sources in the region for black market military kit, but I don't doubt that there are numerous.

TEEEJ 21st Sep 2016 19:32

Bellingcat analysis of the Syrian Red Crescent Aid convoy attack.

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena...-aid-analysis/

Wokkafans 21st Sep 2016 21:04

Deleted - false news report

Pontius Navigator 21st Sep 2016 21:08

Wander, saw one video, supposedly Russian monitoring an aid convoy and tracking an ISIS armoured vehicle. Fine but it doesn't follow that they then targeted it.

dead_pan 22nd Sep 2016 08:34

Russia's (alleged) targeting of the UN aid convoy in (alleged) response to mistaken coalition attack on Syrian forces may indicate that Russia may have taken casualties in this attack too (Russian SF?).

Did I read somewhere that the forces attacked were dressed as irregulars and driving technicals?

dead_pan 22nd Sep 2016 08:39


saw one video, supposedly Russian monitoring an aid convoy and tracking an ISIS armoured vehicle. Fine but it doesn't follow that they then targeted it.
Hmm, it does suspiciously end before anything interesting happens. The line being spun on Russian media is that the militants then attacked the convoy (the usual Russian up-is-down black-is-white propaganda).

ShotOne 22nd Sep 2016 08:40

If that were the case it would indicate a self-destructive streak. The US claims to have informed Russian counterparts of the attack coordinates in advance and that they cynically delayed doing anything about it.

Wander00 22nd Sep 2016 11:30

I am only going on what I see on the news, I guess if barrel bombs it would been more likely to be Assad's minions, if something more sophisticated themn I would suspect Russia, official or "deniable"

racedo 22nd Sep 2016 21:18


The US claims to have informed Russian counterparts of the attack coordinates in advance
Er MSF supplied coordinates of its hospitals previously and they never seem to have been passed on.

TEEEJ 22nd Sep 2016 22:35

More analysis on the Syrian Red Crescent aid convoy attack.

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena...convoy-attack/

ORAC 23rd Sep 2016 07:22

Shrapnel and bomb fin expose Kremlin?s lies | World | The Times & The Sunday Times

The Kremlin’s version of events surrounding the attack on an aid convoy in which 20 civilians died is demonstrably false, according to analysts in Russia and the UK (Tom Coghlan and Tom Parfitt write).

The Conflict Intelligence Team (CIT), an independent, Russia-based group of analysts, used geo-location technology to analyse drone footage released by Moscow to support its claim that a rebel military vehicle towing a large mortar was travelling with the doomed convoy. After studying the position of the sun and satellite images of the location, they concluded that the footage was filmed five hours before the attack and almost four miles from where it took place.........

TEEEJ 24th Sep 2016 16:00

Claimed to be footage from the Red Crescent convoy attack. Aircraft cannon fire at 1:05, 1:40. 2:21 missile strike?


DroneDog 26th Sep 2016 13:30

That Bellingcat report...

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena...convoy-attack/

How come the medicine packaging around the bomb (intentional explosive) is untouched.

TEEEJ 26th Sep 2016 14:43


Originally Posted by DroneDog (Post 9521031)
That Bellingcat report...

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena...convoy-attack/

How come the medicine packaging around the bomb (intentional explosive) is untouched.

Possibly the bomb tail is from a previous attack on the building/compound? Possibly the bomb didn't explode?

Claims that the Russian UAV convoy footage shows that the hole in the roof was already there prior to the convoy being attacked.

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtOMDCCWAAA_hzk.jpg:large

recceguy 27th Sep 2016 10:26


Originally Posted by TBM -Legend
Some 15,000 French civilians killed on or about D-Day. Collateral damage was expected. They didn't cancel Operation Overlord because of this..

Exactly - the important thing is to bomb, isn't it ? and you wonder why they still hate you for that....

Regarding Syria, immediately after the US/UK strike, jihadists came out of their trenches to attack the bombed positions, which was also pure hasard (as the fact that the bombed hill was strategic in the defense of Deir Az Zor airport, a besieged isolated area in eastern Syria (where nobody from the mainstream media will be there to make a movie about those bombings) And you still want us to believe there was no coordination ?

DroneDog 27th Sep 2016 14:43

I smell a large rat....


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.