PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Pilatus PC21, as fast or faster than WW2 fighters ? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/583397-pilatus-pc21-fast-faster-than-ww2-fighters.html)

Davef68 1st Sep 2016 07:38


Originally Posted by Fortissimo (Post 9486547)
As others have noted, PC9 was a clear winner apart from the unfortunate part about it not coming from Brazil.

Or more relevant perhaps, not being built in Belfast

Lingo Dan 2nd Sep 2016 11:24

What was "normal procedure" for making good a late time at a turning point? My experience on the JP was in 1970 :)

Madbob 2nd Sep 2016 17:20

LingoDan


The time tolerances we worked to in say a Final Nav Test ISTR +/- 6 seconds all using Mk1 eyeball, stopwatch, compass and map (1:50,000 for the IP to target).


There were two options to catch up time; the first obviously was to cut the corner at a turning point or more scientifically, say if say 30 seconds late when planning to have a ground speed of 300 kts, i.e. 5 miles a minute, to increase speed. 30 seconds late meant that you had 2.5 miles to catch up.




How much and how long depended on how long you had left to the target but say it was 10 minutes away, then you could increase speed by 30 knots (an extra 1/2 mile per minute) for 5 minutes to get back the lost time and then revert to the planned speed after allowing for the higher headwind. If you were early due to a tailwind then the amount you had to slow down by could be worked out in the same way.


Obviously the JP only had a limited margin to increase speed so this wouldn't allow for major deviations from plan but you still were expected to try!


I hope that this makes sense - it was over 35 years ago and way before GPS!


MB


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:15.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.