PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Americas latest hi-tech combat aircraft to take the war to ISIS (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/575884-americas-latest-hi-tech-combat-aircraft-take-war-isis.html)

NutLoose 9th Mar 2016 14:43

Americas latest hi-tech combat aircraft to take the war to ISIS
 
Is........ The mighty Bronco

America?s Antique Planes Battling ISIS

now where did we put those Wessex?

It makes sense, I wonder if it will lead to orders of aircraft such as the Cessna Scorpion.

PersonFromPorlock 9th Mar 2016 15:09

Another half-measure, now over. Not a bad idea, mind you, but even good ideas don't avail much in the face of unserious application.

pettinger93 9th Mar 2016 15:44

antique planes revived
 
How about building some new DH Hornets ( Eric Winkle's favourite propeller aircraft : a development of the WW2 Mosquito). Fast, cheap and, being made from wood, a low radar signature.

Lonewolf_50 9th Mar 2016 15:50

Depending on what UAV's you have available, some of them can do what a Bronco does. That said, I like it. Not every target needs a silver bullet.

Vzlet 9th Mar 2016 15:52

Bare Decks?
 
Perhaps a solution for anyone with F-35-delay issues.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...2%29_1987.JPEG

(Larger version here.)

PhilipG 9th Mar 2016 16:00

An interesting decision to use old Broncos, as I recall a Jordanian F16 was shot down by ISIS a few years ago, the pilot was then murdered. What extra did the Bronco bringing to the party that a drone could not?

Herod 9th Mar 2016 16:35

Am I missing something? The picture of the Bronco (very nice) is captioned "Four Broncos in a diamond formation". Either they're stacked one above another (very tight diamond) or it's "same way, same day"

NutLoose 9th Mar 2016 17:13

Well the Bronco could carry pax Phillip.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_...l_OV-10_Bronco

Kitbag 9th Mar 2016 17:34

Always surprised me it could carry 5? paratroopers.

PhilipG 9th Mar 2016 18:01

I suppose my real point is why would anyone want to go over Iraq or Syria in a Bronco, even if they are paratroops, when they know that if shot down they would be meeting their maker on You Tube quite quickly. Looking for 15 minutes of fame?

GlobalNav 9th Mar 2016 18:08


Originally Posted by PhilipG (Post 9305296)
I suppose my real point is why would anyone want to go over Iraq or Syria in a Bronco, even if they are paratroops, when they know that if shot down they would be meeting their maker on You Tube quite quickly. Looking for 15 minutes of fame?

Not to make a conclusive military judgment, but the OV-10 has a good bit of history (US Marines and USAF) operating in places where they would attract ground fire from folks who truly knew how to dish it out. Fast-movers were also known to be vulnerable to anti-aircraft weapons in the same places. So it's not necessarily a bad idea to try the OV-10 out in Syria and see if it can materially contribute to the effort.

Danny42C 9th Mar 2016 18:18

The old ideas are often the best...
 
Nutloose (your #1),

(My #7334, 22 Aug 2015, in "Pilot's Brevet...")

...As I see it there are only two questions:

1. Are we going to get it ?...... 2. If we do, will it work ?

There is one sure-fire way of settling "2". Find a war going on somewhere and think up a rationale for supplying a few F-35 to one side. There is nothing like a war for showing what kit works - and what doesn't ! (I've been told the "Sidewinder" was "Road-tested" in this way, but then you hear all sorts of things)....
(Relevant to the matter under discussion ?)

Danny.

West Coast 9th Mar 2016 21:53


I suppose my real point is why would anyone want to go over Iraq or Syria in a Bronco, even if they are paratroops, when they know that if shot down they would be meeting their maker on You Tube quite quickly. Looking for 15 minutes of fame?
It's been shown that the same fate awaits FJ's as well.

cokecan 10th Mar 2016 11:28

and which do we think will be easier to shoot down - an F-16 doing 500kts at 10,000ft with the ability to be doing 1,000kts at 20,000ft 30 seconds later should the hot stuff start coming a bit close, or a Bronco doing 200kts at 10,000ft with the ability to be doing 210 kts at 10,100ft 30 seconds later if the hot stuff starts coming a bit close?

IS have scored one in the umpteen thousand goes they had at fast jets, if we give them umpteen thousand opportunities to fire at an OV-10, how many do you think they'll get?

NutLoose 10th Mar 2016 11:56

I would have thought a lot will depend on which is chucking out the greater heat signature...

Martin the Martian 10th Mar 2016 12:19

The Bronco can still fly faster than an Apache or a Cobra, I notice, and if Tony de Bruin's ex-German OV-10 is anything to go by, it can certainly be thrown around the sky in a pleasingly agile fashion.

Now there's a thought for the AAC's Apache replacement: new Broncos fitted out with the appropriate avionics and weapons and with the gun turret once trialled on it. The higher echelons of the RAF would have a fit.

LowObservable 10th Mar 2016 12:27

Missile launch warning detectors + flares (the OV-10G+ appears to have both, from publicly available photos) have proven quite effective against MANPADS. Turboprop exhausts at the edge of the missile's envelope (10,000-15,000 ft slant range) are not a huge target.

Other differences since the last time anyone used an OV-10 in combat include much better EO/IR sensors and digital map displays, which do a lot for SA at altitudes above the golden-BB (and even medium-cal AAA) range.

It also has two crew, both with a good view and the Mk 1 eyeball's wide-angle coverage, rather than being confined to the soda-straw EO picture, and it doesn't rely on a satellite link.

wanabee777 10th Mar 2016 12:40

Next thing you know, they'll be resurrecting the A-1 Skyraider.


andyy 10th Mar 2016 13:16

Wasn't there a desire to deploy them to Afghanistan in some quarters several years ago? And didn't this desire result in trials of a Super Tucano for a similar COIN role.

I even vaguely remember day dreams of RAF Tucanos being armed for Afganistan duties, although nothing came of that.

West Coast 10th Mar 2016 13:55


and which do we think will be easier to shoot down - an F-16 doing 500kts at 10,000ft with the ability to be doing 1,000kts at 20,000ft 30 seconds later should the hot stuff start coming a bit close, or a Bronco doing 200kts at 10,000ft with the ability to be doing 210 kts at 10,100ft 30 seconds later if the hot stuff starts coming a bit close?
Kind of hard to take that seriously.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:30.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.