Airborne Nuclear Weapons incidents
Reading over weekend about various Nuclear Weapons accidents since the original bucket of sunshine first saw the light of day.
Was well aware of the various Submarine nuclear accidents where missiles got removed by various "interested parties" after a sinking. In a way that was easier because well away from land and generally in deep water. The out of sight out of mind viewpoint. Also aware of various incidents in reportage of airborne losses but reading further there just seemed to be a real gap. As far as is in public knowledge there were no losses under the V Force while carrying, also little on any French losses. USAF losses are generally in public domain but there seems to be nothing about Nuclear losses from USSR in an airborne capacity. Now I am not sure whether this has been because they were covered up well but even by now I would suggest we would have known about them. The other alternate is that Soviet (now Russian) Nuclear doctrine was to try and avoid loading Nukes on aircraft. Down to possibility of crashing or because of lack of control issues or there wasn't enough trust in Pilots. Interested in viewpoints on this. |
racedo,
"The Bombs of Palomares" is a good read ! Danny. |
V-Force - nil to answer your question.
|
Danny, and Thule.
|
Not an airborne incident, but the book Command and Control by Eric Schlosser detailing the TitanII missile disaster at Damascus is a damn good read. Technicians ignore SOPs regarding procedures, resulting in an explosion that blows the warhead out of the silo. The entire chain of command is dissected in the book in dramatic style and found to be woefully inadequate.
|
2 serious accidents in the UK:
27 Jul 1957 at Lakenheath, when a B-47 crashed into the nuclear weapons storage area. There were 3 weapons inside, one of which was so badly damaged it was close to detonation. 28 Feb 1958 at Greenham Common, when a B-47 (Granville 20) jettisoned both external tanks which caught fire on hitting the ground, destroying a second B-47 and a hangar. The US would neither confirm nor deny that the second aircraft contained a weapon (or was being loaded at the time), but later surveys detected a radiation hotspot in the vicinity. Subsequent leukaemia cases in the area are allegedly higher than the normal average. |
Subsequent leukaemia cases in the area are allegedly higher than the normal average. Of course, we're not far from AWE either. |
There was one…..;)
Pictures & Photos from Thunderball (1965) - IMDb Btw, i'm sure that i read that the Spanish site is still cordoned off and needs to be further excavated and cleaned even after all these years. |
The weapon that was dropped in the sea off the coast of Savannah has never been recovered.
|
Originally Posted by racedo
(Post 9248935)
USAF losses are generally in public domain but there seems to be nothing about Nuclear losses from USSR in an airborne capacity.
Now I am not sure whether this has been because they were covered up well but even by now I would suggest we would have known about them. Remember, they even tried to pretend Chernobyl hadn't happened - despite the plumes of unmistakable isotopes that clearly proved that it had. I daresay there are hair-raising tales to be told from behind the Iron Curtain - lots more than from the West given Russia's less than careful approach to such things. |
I daresay there are hair-raising tales to be told from behind the Iron Curtain - lots more than from the West given Russia's less than careful approach to such things. I feel that they probably approached their tasks with the same degree of commitment and professionalism as we did. YS |
Neither have I read of any instances; other than weapons tests; when they flew with warshot weapons. |
2 racedo:
You wrote: "..... and avoid loading Nukes on aircraft. Down to possibility of crashing...." That's correct. I do not know, though, if many incidents and bomb losses in the US AF influenced the decision to avoid loading nukes on the bombers without a solid reason (like the Caribbean crisis, e.g.). After the Soviet Union fell apart, all the archives were made accessible and no mysteries remained. Indeed, many accidents with subs happened, but no serious ones with aircraft. See, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...lear_accidents You wrote: "...or because of lack of control issues... " definitely not, everything was (and is) OK with control. You wrote: "or there wasn't enough trust in Pilots." Absolutely not. The pilots (and all other personnel dealing with this stuff) passed through extremely tough selection and were monitored permanently. As it was already correctly mentioned above, the number of experts involved was limited to absolute minimum, they all were highly qualified military pilots and engineers. |
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
(Post 9249120)
V-Force - nil to answer your question.
|
There were 3 weapons inside, one of which was so badly damaged it was close to detonation. |
"Other than the test drops, did any UK aircraft ever fly with a live weapon?"
Unless this information has been officially released, wouldn't it be classified? Should we not be careful? |
Thinking out loud, one wonders, for example, how weapons [if there were any] were retrieved from RAFG during the run-down.
Other than secretly, of course. |
Unless this information has been officially released, wouldn't it be classified? Should we not be careful? With one eye on the street outside for the arrival of the van with blacked out windows, of course ;) |
Its my understanding that V bombers never flew with live weapons (apart from on weapon tests of course). Or in Thunderball.
In fact, its possible that the only time they were ever loaded with live weapons was during the Cuban crisis..... but that it an assumption not a fact. |
if you want your eyes opened about the USSR as was read Biohazard - "the Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World"
It was written by Ken Alibek, the person in charge of the programme and who defected when Yeltsin cam to power. You will find out why he left when Yeltsin became powerful and how Yeltsin covered up such an incident on a city wide scale. Truly scary stuff. if they do this with bugs what do they do with isotopes? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.