PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Argentine fast jet weapons choice - Falklands (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/571540-argentine-fast-jet-weapons-choice-falklands.html)

Pontius Navigator 11th Dec 2015 17:24

Tourist, not aware the Army had Type 45 as well.

Tourist 11th Dec 2015 17:40

My question was re the "it's not just the RN" bit, as if the RN was in some way a force lacking SAM capability as I'm sure you are aware.

Pontius Navigator 11th Dec 2015 18:59

Tourist, sorry, couldn't resist. Sadly 6x45 is quite limiting though. I would guess two to escort the QE, one in maintenance, one in work up, ....

Now if they could produce a mobile, air transportable version or, as Harry mentioned S400 or Patriot we would be in business.

Heathrow Harry 13th Dec 2015 16:15

I've always said we'd be better off with 10 45's rather than 2 carriers

it would also be a good idea to fit all of them with a decent surface to surface missile as well but God forbid we 'd have a ship that could do more than one job.............................

AndySmith 15th Dec 2015 21:02

Returning to the OP question, I finally had a reply from the A4B pilot I have contact with. I think the reason he took so long to reply is that they had their reunion at the weekend, and I guess he wanted to confer. Anyway, here is the translation of his reply to my questions - as per the OP.

"The pilots were well aware of the technological inferiority of their aircraft and the survival equipment with regard to carrying out attacks against the RN ships. We knew we had to minimise the time we were exposed to the radar and the anti aircraft artillery of the ships. With regard to the Zuni rockets, I can tell you that when it was analysed what we needed to do to carry out an effective attack against a target, it was necessary to carry out an attack at an angle in excess of 10 degrees and from a distance that serious compromised our chances of survival, as much from the anti aircraft fire as the shrapnel from our own rockets. It was concluded that an attack with bombs from very low level gave us the greatest chance of survival."

Cheers

typerated 17th Dec 2015 16:29

Thanks Andy,


I can see that in open water and that was always going to be a much harder environment to survive in.


I was thinking that rockets would have been preferable in San Carlos Water though.
No detection until the attack aircraft pop over a ridge with quite a short distance to run - effectively you get the pop up for free.


What was the preferred ordnance attacking ships at Loch Ewe on JMC's - pretty similar environment I would have thought?


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:47.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.