PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   New RAF Rank? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/563906-new-raf-rank.html)

Janda 2nd Jul 2015 00:38

New RAF Rank?
 
Have just watched a news item regarding the repatriation of those unfortunate Brits that were murdered in Tunisia. I noticed among the RAF pallbearers a couple of airmen with single chevrons on their sleeves. Is this a new rank?

The Helpful Stacker 2nd Jul 2015 00:56

Did they have RAF Regiment 'mudguards' at the top of their sleeves?

The RAF Reg have had Lance Corporals for a while now, to give them equivalency with the Army, who they often operate with. "He is a Senior SAC" doesn't cut it when working with an organisation not renowned for their flexibility nor intelligence.

Back when I served on TSW (a unit who also spent a large amount of their time working alongside the Army) 'Senior SACs' would occasionally be given Acting Corporal rank in order that they could run dets on ops/exercises and have some semblance of rank to deal with the Army.

MAINJAFAD 2nd Jul 2015 01:09

The Helpful Stacker is correct, the RAF Regiment have had Lance Corporal for the last few years. If memory serves it's a local acting unpaid rank and is done to allow a senior SAC gunner to act as a section 2IC, exactly as a Lance Corporal would do in the Infantry. It is done for valid operational reasons, especially when working with the Army.

Janda 2nd Jul 2015 01:46

Thanks to both. Have been out to long. I understand the Junior Tech rank has disappeared as well. Changes to many for an old fella!:confused:

Yozzer 2nd Jul 2015 04:35


acting unpaid rank
This makes my blood boil. If our system is lacking, and clearly it is, then the rank, responsibility, and pay should be given. I have no issue with said rank being the exclusive domain of the RAF Regt, though these days multi-service operations/exercises, indeed squadrons are the norm, and if the 'need' extends to other trades, then the RAF should formally adopt the rank of Lance Corporal - NOW.

serf 2nd Jul 2015 04:55

senior senior aircraftsman.....

Door Slider 2nd Jul 2015 05:43

The rank of LCpl is not awarded locally. LCpl in the Army, RM and RAF all sit in the same pay grade, which incidentally also covers SAC and JT (the few that are left).

4Greens 2nd Jul 2015 06:38

My Dad was a Lance Corporal in the RAF Regiment in the Second World War. He got paid a little extra.

ancientaviator62 2nd Jul 2015 06:49

Yozzer,
speaking of unpaid ranks whe I was a J/T on 92 I had an 'oversigning chit' which gave me the responsibilities of a Corporal without either the prestige of the rank or the pay. I wonder if this system is still in operation.

Pontius Navigator 2nd Jul 2015 07:06

Don't forget SAC Tech, another relatively new rank.

Ty Downsizer

Ok, true not a rank but an insignia, just like a chief tech?

PS, would an SAC(T) continue to wear that insignia after a successful change of trade?

downsizer 2nd Jul 2015 07:24

SAC Tech is not a rank. It is an attainment of technical competency. The sit exactly level with non-technical SACs and therefore are....SACs.

Tankertrashnav 2nd Jul 2015 08:55


My Dad was a Lance Corporal in the RAF Regiment in the Second World War. He got paid a little extra
As a former rock I was interested to learn that. In the immediate period after its formation in 1942 RAF Regiment personnel wore khaki battledress but with blue insignia. I guess the Lance Corporal rank "came across" from the army but was dropped fairly early on, until its reintroduction a few years back.

(PS - wrong thread P-N?) ;)

downsizer 2nd Jul 2015 09:32


Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator (Post 9031495)

Ty Downsizer

Ok, true not a rank but an insignia, just like a chief tech?

PS, would an SAC(T) continue to wear that insignia after a successful change of trade?

Chf Tech is a recognised rank though and has powers of command over Sgts.

If an SAC Tech remustered they would only become an SAC Tech again if they remustered to a technical trade and completed the requisite requirements to be classed as a tech in the new trade.

ian16th 2nd Jul 2015 10:15


when I was a J/T on 92 I had an 'oversigning chit' which gave me the responsibilities of a Corporal without either the prestige of the rank or the pay.
I had one in 1956!

Does that make my chit senior to yours? :ok:

ancientaviator62 2nd Jul 2015 10:44

IAN,
my chit was issued in 1962 on 92 Sqn. So yours is definitely the senior.
We were both robbed ! When I suggested to the ENG O that he get me acting paid rank he thought that I should have been proud to have been so 'selected' !

212man 2nd Jul 2015 11:02


This makes my blood boil. If our system is lacking, and clearly it is, then the rank, responsibility, and pay should be given
It would appear the pay is the same.....:ok:

Royal Air Force Pay Scales 2015 - 2016 - Armed Forces - RAF Officers Pay Rates - Other Ranks Pay Rates

Army Pay Scales 2015 - 2016 - Armed Forces - British Army Officers Pay Rates - Soldiers rates of pay Other Ranks Pay Rates

ian16th 2nd Jul 2015 12:23

The RAF has always undervalued technical skills.

In the USAF, anyone with the technical skills of a J/T or today's SAC(T) is in the Sergants Mess! In the RAF he's not even in the Cpl's Club.

langleybaston 2nd Jul 2015 12:33

Clarification please.

In the army lance-corporal is a rank, not an appointment, this was introduced many years ago.

Is the RAF Regiment lance-corporal a rank or an appointment? I suspect the latter, thus no equality in fact.

goudie 2nd Jul 2015 12:34


The RAF has always undervalued technical skills.
As it demonstrated in the 1964 re-org. of ranks. Hasn't got it right since, it would seem

downsizer 2nd Jul 2015 13:03


Originally Posted by langleybaston (Post 9031908)

Is the RAF Regiment lance-corporal a rank or an appointment? I suspect the latter, thus no equality in fact.

Wrong, LCpl is a rank and all gunners now pass through it on the way to Cpl.


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:55.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.