PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   BUFF 'Ghostrider' back up and out of the boneyard (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/556768-buff-ghostrider-back-up-out-boneyard.html)

chopper2004 18th Feb 2015 14:09

BUFF 'Ghostrider' back up and out of the boneyard
 
From Boneyard to Barksdale, a mothballed B-52 Stratofortress flies again.

Cheers

Tocsin 20th Feb 2015 13:44

It struck me as odd, from this and other reports, that an airframe kept in the best and most ready state would still take over two years to be returned to front line duty...

mikip 20th Feb 2015 15:03

Tocsin

This report says that the arframe was pulled from storage in 2014 and returned to service in mere months - where did two years come from?

Rhino power 20th Feb 2015 15:23

mikip

It hasn't returned to service yet. And it won't do so until sometime in 2016. It's all in the link provided, strangely enough...

-RP

tdracer 20th Feb 2015 15:58

The active BUFFs have been getting regular updates to the avionics and such - perhaps part of the 2 years is to bring this aircraft up the current operation spec?

Rhino power 20th Feb 2015 16:12

tdracer

That's essentially what it says in the link. All the kit has to be stripped out of the jet it's replacing, refitted, airframe inspected and repaired where necessary whilst at Barksdale, then off to Tinker AFB for PDM to bring it up to spec with the rest of the fleet and return to service sometime in 2016...

-RP

mikip 20th Feb 2015 16:29

Ok I accept that I am being over pedantic but it went from storage to flight in months and the extra time is to add all the mods that it would have received if it had not been stored, or to put it another way way it went from storage to what was front line condition whenit was stored in mere months.

I was merely trying to point out that the storage conditions were so good that the frame could be made servicable again very quickly up to date electronics require a little longer

Rhino power 20th Feb 2015 16:40

It wasn't brought up to 'frontline condition' in mere months! It was made airworthy at AMARG, the rest of the mods to bring it up to 'frontline condition' will be done at Barksdale and Tinker AFB! :ugh:

Have you actually read the article in the link?

-RP

sandiego89 20th Feb 2015 17:34

Neat story- the first to really escape the boneyard.

Yes some of the major overhauls at Tinker can take many months.

And good on Colonel Shultz- I would not have thought of any "tall-tail" B-52 driver would still be on active duty. 7,000+ hours on type! That's an impressive shoulder patch.

mikip 20th Feb 2015 19:20

yes I have read the article I said fron line at the point it was stored not current front line line condition

busdriver02 20th Feb 2015 21:47

This is funny, you guys are arguing while saying the same thing.

Heathrow Harry 21st Feb 2015 10:03

exactly - and what is few months here or there in the life history of a B-52.....

con-pilot 21st Feb 2015 17:58


exactly - and what is few months here or there in the life history of a B-52.....
Very true, years ago, very many years ago, I read an article in the 'Tinker Takeoff' (yes Tinker AFB has its own newspaper) about a B-52 that had just come out of a major overhaul/upgrade and the only piece of original equipment/part in the aircraft was the co-pilot's left rudder peddle.

Everything else, including the aircraft skin had been replaced over the years since this particular B-52 rolled off the Boeing assembly line.

glad rag 21st Feb 2015 18:07


Originally Posted by con-pilot (Post 8875203)
Very true, years ago, very many years ago, I read an article in the 'Tinker Takeoff' (yes Tinker AFB has its own newspaper) about a B-52 that had just come out of a major overhaul/upgrade and the only piece of original equipment/part in the aircraft was the co-pilot's left rudder peddle.

Everything else, including the aircraft skin had been replaced over the years since this particular B-52 rolled off the Boeing assembly line.

Would be really neat to be in the component business for those babies that's for sure...

megan 22nd Feb 2015 02:56


only piece of original equipment/part in the aircraft was the co-pilot's left rudder peddle
Don't forget the data plate con. :E

Roadster280 22nd Feb 2015 03:12


Originally Posted by con-pilot (Post 8875203)
Very true, years ago, very many years ago, I read an article in the 'Tinker Takeoff' (yes Tinker AFB has its own newspaper) about a B-52 that had just come out of a major overhaul/upgrade and the only piece of original equipment/part in the aircraft was the co-pilot's left rudder peddle.

Everything else, including the aircraft skin had been replaced over the years since this particular B-52 rolled off the Boeing assembly line.

How can that be? To remove the aircraft skin leaves a skeletal frame. If the frame isn't replaced (at which point you've entirely dismantled the aircraft anyway), then at least the frame remains original. I find it hard to believe that an aircraft would be entirely reduced to parts and then rebuilt. Especially in a fleet of 700+.

tartare 22nd Feb 2015 07:28

Nah - Paddy's axe.
Ten new handles and five new heads.
Still the same axe though...
Sat in a pool in Tuscany once and watched x2 BUFFs way up overhead heading to Kosovo I think?
Thought they were 747s at first then thought, no - 747's don't formate, they're too slow and that's quite a bit of smoke.
Then realised what they were.

tdracer 22nd Feb 2015 19:42

No first hand experience here, but what I've read and heard suggests that replacement of main structural elements (e.g. wing spars) is pretty rare on the BUFF, but they've all been 're-skinned', at least the wings (and given the amount of readily visible 'oil canning' of the fuselage, I'd guess fuselage skin replacements are common as well).

I once did some inspections on a high time 737 going through a 'D' check. There wasn't much there aside from primary structure (although at least in the case of the 737 the original parts would, for the most part, be used when it was put back together).

sandiego89 23rd Feb 2015 15:39

I think the key words here are parts. I think you will find much of the structure (frames, ribs, basic airframe structure) is the same metal that rolled off the assembly line decades ago. Parts, componants and some structure including skins may have been swapped out, but the skeleton likely includes a good deal of original material.

NutLoose 23rd Feb 2015 16:00

One thing that always impressed me was the collapsible nut developed for it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:38.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.