PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   US Squadrons may use UK carrier for operations (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/551946-us-squadrons-may-use-uk-carrier-operations.html)

golamv 26th Nov 2014 23:37

US Squadrons may use UK carrier for operations
 
This is from the BBC:


BBC News - US squadrons 'may use UK carrier' for operations


"The Royal Navy may ask US squadrons to fly off its new aircraft carrier following delays to its new F35B fighters, BBC Newsnight has learned."


How embarrassing is that?

Boudreaux Bob 26th Nov 2014 23:44

No problem....the US Navy has been well trained to work out of spartan quarters in the past....they will get over it. I would bet the trade of Ice Cream Machines for Beer will be acceptable.

Royalistflyer 27th Nov 2014 00:27

Why don't we just buy the Marine's AV8s and fly them ourselves until the F-35 eventually (if ever) arrives.

Arfur Dent 27th Nov 2014 00:47

Or we could buy back the Harriers we sold them not long ago. You couldn't make this up could you Dr Fox???

Boudreaux Bob 27th Nov 2014 01:31

Why not buy some surplus F-18's....we got loads of them with our downsizing!

dat581 27th Nov 2014 03:36

What are you going to fly the F-18s off Bob? Going to borrow an American carrier too?

Dash8driver1312 27th Nov 2014 03:54

US Squadrons may use UK carrier for operations
 
Certain South American nations maintain their carrier qualifications with Gringo-Gaucho exercises any time a US Carrier Group rounds the Cape when transiting from one ocean to the other.

It's called sharing resources and maintaining international relations.

airborne_artist 27th Nov 2014 04:15

"He (Lord Richards)denied that it was humiliating for Britain not to have its own jets ready when it comes into service because the ships could be used for different functions such as carrying helicopters or troops."

But will we have enough helos and soldiers to fill a QE class? :\

TBM-Legend 27th Nov 2014 04:17

So what happened to "Rule Britannia"??:uhoh:


Jollygreengiant64 27th Nov 2014 07:21

Sometimes I wonder why we bothered buying these 2 big carriers. Why not just watch the Americans use theirs? Much cheaper...

NickB 27th Nov 2014 08:32

I wonder if we will ever get the F35B - we've have ordered a grand total of 4 and are now offering the use of the carriers to the US... with another round of defence cuts coming after the GE next year one wonders if the F35B will be cancelled and the two carriers sold off to... the US (to be modded for F35C ops)or some other nation.

Why didn't we keep the Harriers? :ugh:

Royalistflyer 27th Nov 2014 09:39

The Harriers worked and were still viable for their strike role for a few more years, apart from giving us fully trained pilots used to the peculiarities of operation for when (if) the F35B ever eventuates. We would have had a moderately potent couple of carriers.

ProSentia 27th Nov 2014 10:08

"Sometimes I wonder why we bothered buying these 2 big carriers..."

Because they are being built in Gordon Brown's constituency, and they were ordered when he was...

LowObservable 27th Nov 2014 10:08

This would seem to be a stopgap given the earlier arrival of at least some Marine F-35Bs. It also meshes with the new Marine Conops.

Jollygreengiant64 27th Nov 2014 11:39

At least they will have a full complement of aircraft, I suppose :ugh:.

I genuinely wonder whether the clever (Taking politics out of the equation) thing to do in times like these is to just build fresh Harriers/ older generation, proven aircraft and fit them with modern Radar/ Meteor, Sidewinder X, glass cockpit etc... Stealth will be outdone by heavier ground based Radar; then what with the plastic fantastic F35 have? In the future fights we are likely to engage in, would it be worse to use 2 Carriers full of Super Buccaneer/ Super Harrier and the flexibility that brings, compared to using a handful of F35?

dctyke 27th Nov 2014 12:00

Whilst we are waited for aircraft those two carriers could 'carry' an awful lot of ISO containers to and from China! We could also get hundreds of Japanese and Korean cars inside and on the decks. We could call it PPI....... Might even buy one or two more f35s.

lasernigel 27th Nov 2014 12:33

Another problem is look at a US carrier group.


CSG or CVBG normally consist of 1 Aircraft Carrier, 1 Guided Missile Cruisers (for Air Defense), 2 LAMPS (Light Airborne Multi-Purpose System) Capable Warships (focusing on Anti-Submarine and Surface Warfare), and 1–2 Anti Submarine Destroyers or Frigates
Have we got enough spare navy ships to do that now, plus fulfill other commitments???

charliegolf 27th Nov 2014 12:48


"He (Lord Richards)denied that it was humiliating for Britain not to have its own jets ready when it comes into service
I think it's rather sweet of him to be confident they WILL arrive in service before the jets. Bless!

CG

Party Animal 27th Nov 2014 13:23

And of course, there is no embarrassment or humiliation in asking our allies to provide MPA in the defence of Britains interests.

lasernigel - you forgot the supporting SSN and dedicated P-8 MPA.

NutLoose 27th Nov 2014 16:42

It stunned me when I saw the size of the fleet sent out to welcome the German grand fleet upon its surrender at the end of WW1..
But we must be the laughing stock of the world over the carrier farce...

See

BBC News - The day the entire German fleet surrendered


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.