Sikorsky rolls out CH-53K
Aptly named King Stallion
Sikorsky Unveils CH-53K Helicopter; U.S. Marine Corps Reveals Aircraft Name Cheers |
That is one big motherf*cker of a helicopter.
|
I hope it doesn't have the teething problems the E model did. The echo,was savaged in the media near the old Marine base at Tustin Ca where I grew up. The local paper there had a hard on for it.
|
"Rolling out" may or may not mean putting that monster into the air.
The ground test vehicle went live on 17 April, but I seem to recall that it won't leave the earth. That beauty in the pictures here may fly soon. Huzzah! :ok: |
Super size pic of EDM 2, that rotor head is rather impressive!
-RP http://mms.businesswire.com/media/20...jpg?download=1 -RP |
Why is the tailplane canted to port?
Something to do with a weird torque vector? |
That is one big motherf*cker of a helicopter. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-1842C-182.jpg Does a -53 always go on top?.. Why is the tailplane canted to port? Although the prototypes were built with a wide-span, low-mounted symmetrical tailfin, flight control problems led to refitting the second machine with of a distinctive new tail assembly, with the tailfin canted to the left by 20 degrees and an inverted-gull asymmetric tailplane mounted on the right. This change was used in production S-80s. |
That is one big motherf*cker of a helicopter. |
Pah, I'll see your Stallions and Halos and raise you a Homer!
http://i1324.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1d73a1b2.jpg |
I was wondering who nicked all my scaffolding...
|
Melmothtw, you can take off half of the main rotors on a Ch53 and still fly it, i'd like to see you do it with that hunk of junk ;)
|
Aye Nutloose, but try flying your CH-53 without a tail rotor...
|
Nutloose
Which half of 7 would you remove? |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 8465863)
Melmothtw, you can take off half of the main rotors on a Ch53 and still fly it, i'd like to see you do it with that hunk of junk ;)
(Tourist, hee hee, well played :ok:) The Black Hawk / S-70 family also has a canted tail rotor, which (according to our old NATOPS manual for the Seahawk) provides up to 2.5 percent of the total vertical lift. :8 CH-53K: oh, what a beautiful beast! :D I will go out on a limb and suggest that Igor his own self would be mightily pleased with the King Stallion. |
Lets hope they dont try to roll this one ...the last time didn't end well.
Amazing machine the " homer" shame only two built, but when the soviet air force says niet you know you have problems! Any one know if the eu / uk heavy lift competition still going on, i seem to remember a supersize euro tandem twin design being flashed about..... This and the king would be an interesting sight |
|
I never said which variant Tourist ;)
http://www.popasmoke.com/visions/alb...CH_53-4225.jpg Comment by: Nikolaos I. Hantzis on Apr 6, 2006 04:44 AM Yep, this is true. I was lucky to work at Sikorsky in Stratford C.T. from 1987 to 1989. Jimmy Kay was the Sikorsky test pilot who was flying at the time this photo was taken ( I have a signed black and white copy at home) He said that they had a slight vibration @80knts and around 110 knts but everything else was smooth flying. |
Is that as close as Sikorsky can get to a BERP blade without paying the UK royalties?
|
Nutloose: neat, had no idea they'd done that. :ok:
VX: I'd need to look at some more images of the BERP. Various manufacturers have been messing about with blade tips for decades. I am not sure I see how the blades shown on the K are a BERP copy. :confused: There's a lot going on there, it looks like from the photographs available. |
Don't try and stand near one as it either lands or takes off......
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:27. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.