PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Red Arrows makeover for 2014. (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/531147-red-arrows-makeover-2014-a.html)

MSOCS 17th Jan 2014 12:30

Hangarshuffle, you are now clearly revealing that you know neither the price nor value of things following that statement. Replacing with Typhoon?!! At around 10 times the cost per flying hour to operate, even reducing the Reds to 5 jets would be more expensive overall! Moreover, it would take 5 war jets away from where they would be better utilised. Seriously, lay off the pints of 'bitter & twisted' mate.

The reason RAFAT survives is that it delivers way more than the resource with which it is allocated. In recruitment, sales exports and professional prestige terms alone, the Reds punch well above their weight.

I'm personally glad that they are celebrating such an important milestone in 2014 and I'm confident they'll do it with a hefty amount of éclat!

Davef68 17th Jan 2014 12:38


Originally Posted by MSOCS (Post 8269152)
Hangarshuffle, you are now clearly revealing that you know neither the price nor value of things following that statement. Replacing with Typhoon?!! At around 10 times the cost per flying hour to operate, even reducing the Reds to 5 jets would be more expensive overall! Moreover, it would take 5 war jets away from where they would be better utilised. Seriously, lay off the pints of 'bitter & twisted' mate.

Aside from the cost (! :)) it would give them something to do with all the Tranche 1 jets that are due to be retired........

gr4techie 17th Jan 2014 12:56

.... Could be worse. They could be replaced with spare Tornado GR4's. Good luck trying to get 9 serviceable and the crowd may have to wait half an hour and need good eyesight as the GR4's turn through 180 degs at the end of each flypast.

Hangarshuffle 17th Jan 2014 13:22

The Dearworthers.
 
Hang on a minute!! RAF Scampton only has one flying unit - the Dearworthers!! I've just read it!


RAF Scampton - RAF Station homepage


The old WingCO looks a bit puce - is he sat on a hedgehog or something?!




You mean to tell me they cant share?! When whole units and bases and squadrons closed or were binned, the RAF keep this little flying thing going?! Hell, that's a scam....Scampton!!


Fair point DWOCS about costs mate - seem I know as little as anyone else?!!


Its a fig leaf for our politicians to pretend all is well in the world - everyone knows this.


Its just in these defence cash strapped times Id be happier if it was a proper combat unit flying proper fighter planes.


Maybe they should do a display and turn the smoke on to form the shapes or forms of numbers, how much they cost, how much they bring in?!!

Genstabler 17th Jan 2014 15:08


- everyone knows this.
The signature phrase of those conspiracy theorists who don't actually have a clue. Keep taking your pills Mr Shuffle.

Archimedes 17th Jan 2014 16:15


Originally Posted by Hangarshuffle (Post 8268269)
Use Typhoons instead? Something new, better. Let the UK taxpayers see what their hard earned pays for.
Reduce the formation to say, five.
Paint them red, but keep them within the admin of a proper operational RAF squadron.


The only way forward, far as I can see. Sorry but I think the old way is past it.

The 'old way' was, in fact, to nominate a fighter squadron as the RAFAT - hence the Black Arrows, Blue Diamonds (Hunters), Tigers and Firebirds (Lightnings). This was hugely expensive and, in effect, rendered a fighter squadron non-operational for the duration of their time as the aerobatic display squadron.

It seems that your concern is that the Red Arrows reduce the operational effectiveness of the RAF. If so, then your proposed solution would have a direct, negative effect upon the operational effectiveness of the RAF several orders of magnitude greater than continuing to operate an RAFAT with nine Hawk T1s...

Double Hush 18th Jan 2014 06:08

At a time when it's becoming ever more difficult to man the FTSs, it does seem incongruous that the RAF still has a pool of 9 potential QFIs in the Reds. We have to face the fact that with all the cutbacks, the RAF is dropping below a self-sustaining level for its current format; something has to give.

Evalu8ter 18th Jan 2014 07:14

DH,
Merge RAFAT with The Ton and fly a simpler display requiring less aircraft and less intensive training (Patrouille Suisse style?). Enables a coherent use and conservation of remaining T1 'life' and would generate appreciable savings in Operating Costs. Oh and Scampton can finally be put out of its misery....:(

newt 18th Jan 2014 08:13

"The time has come," the Walrus said!

It was always on the cards! Even in my time in the MOD it was included as a line in the annual LTC review. It would now appear inevitable as the RAF shrinks to almost a token force. It can no longer be seen as an essential recruitment tool as the requirement for pilots is slim to say the least! Furthermore, how much longer will FJ pilots be required to fly in close formation? Is it a necessary skill in this day and age?

If we can't afford to operate two aircraft carriers then how can we afford the Reds? I know they will be sadly missed by all the small kids, many of whom have never seen a low flying aircraft. A great shame but a sign of the times!:ok:

Pure Pursuit 18th Jan 2014 08:16

Evalu8ter,

I think you'd be rather surprised at what's in store for scampton over the coming years. It fits into the new employment model rather well...

Why bin the Reds? It's hardly costing a fortune and let's face it, we are not exactly screaming out for pilots at the moment. Although it's not directly measured, I think it's fair to say that most kids become incredibly excited when they see the reds up and about. A powerful tool.

The same can't be said for the Vulcan. Very badly run project and borderline dangerous. Get rid!!!

Double Hush 18th Jan 2014 08:52

PP, that's just the point; in certain areas the RAF is screaming out for pilots, especially with the right attributes necessary for QFI. There doesn't seem to be enough of a pool to feed both QFI and RAFAT.

Willard Whyte 18th Jan 2014 09:46


Why bin the Reds? It's hardly costing a fortune and let's face it, we are not exactly screaming out for pilots at the moment. Although it's not directly measured, I think it's fair to say that most kids become incredibly excited when they see the reds up and about. A powerful tool.

The same can't be said for the Vulcan. Very badly run project and borderline dangerous. Get rid!!!
Whilst by no means a scientific, or necessarily representative, indication, my boys are just as excited by the Vulcan as the Reds, perhaps more so.

Not sure what difference it makes anyway, it won't alter my opinion of what their dad thinks the defence budget should be spent on, how big said budget should be, or which way I'll vote next year.

I certainly wouldn't encourage either of them to join up either. I'd support them if they did, of course, but for now I'm 'directing' their interest elsewhere - which isn't too hard a task in any case.

Personally I'd rather see XD818 flying again!

just another jocky 18th Jan 2014 09:52


Originally Posted by gr4techie
.... Could be worse. They could be replaced with spare Tornado GR4's. Good luck trying to get 9 serviceable and the crowd may have to wait half an hour and need good eyesight as the GR4's turn through 180 degs at the end of each flypast.

Such a legacy opinion.....;)

CoffmanStarter 18th Jan 2014 10:36

Sadly ... I think Newt has called it about right above :(

Maybe 39 Squadron should make a Take Over bid for these guys ...

http://i1004.photobucket.com/albums/...psbe031039.png

Ironic they are also recruiting ...

Pure Pursuit 18th Jan 2014 13:35

DH
 
I don't think culling RAFAT will fix the lack of QFI issue although, I do see your point. The drawdown of the GR4 fleet will surely offer more pilots up to the QFI world.

Bottom line is that it's not RAFAT's fault, I'd be more likely to lay blame at the dreadful state of affairs IV Sqn have been forced into under an appalling contract!

Double Hush 18th Jan 2014 17:12

PP

When is the GR4 drawdown? There seems to be some slippage on that! The main point though is whether the GR4 pilots offered upto CFS have the requisite flying hours and experience to pass the initial QFI selection hurdle - there's not a lot of (quality) flying going on in that world at the moment. If not, will they have enough for the Red's? And if not - who will?

Your comment about IV is most perceptive.

Pure Pursuit 18th Jan 2014 17:27

I was under the impression that the force starts to drawdown next year.

teeteringhead 18th Jan 2014 18:24

My guess would be 4 years and counting ...... pull out all the stops, cannibalising the fleet, to keep a 9-ship for the 100th Birthday (if we get that far :() - then Endex Reds.

NutLoose 18th Jan 2014 19:01

And to misquote Blue Peter


And here are some we prepared earlier

Reduced to Produce: End of the RAF's Tornado F3 Interceptors | Urban Ghosts |

Mothballed Tornado GR1 and GR4 Await Scrapping at Shawbury | Urban Ghosts |

CoffmanStarter 18th Jan 2014 19:20

Nutty ... Those are very sad pics old chap ... especially the remains of the Leuchars F4's :{


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.