Camp Bastion attack, September 2012. A spot of daytime tv..
 

Player

2.30 pm, Tuesday 17 December 2013

Here is the link to the HCDC transcript of the seesion (public session only, redacted private session not yet available).

House of Commons - Uncorrected Evidence - HC 830

So we believe the US were right to hold an inquiry and to hold their own personnel accountable. As for the absence of a UK Service Inquiry you get the first quote from CJO, supported by the 2nd quote from CoS PJHQ:

So that's ok then, the UK has decided that nobody is empowered to convene a service inquiry in such circumstances. Are we really that incompetent that we have no ability to conduct inquiries on joint ops or is this a convenient fib to Parliament?

As for this bit:

I'm glad she checked….

The Marine Aviation Executive Officer, who led the USMC response to the Camp Bastion Attack following the Commanding Officer being mortally wounded, has received a Silver Star for his actions during the Attack.

Newest Silver Star recipient defied death to save fellow Marines, crush Taliban ambush | Marine Corps Times | marinecorpstimes.com


The Investigation Final Report

https://www2.centcom.mil/sites/foia/...%20(Final).pdf



Or.....

http://www.hqmc.marines.mil/Portals/...6%20Report.pdf

Thanks for posting the Link. It seems a large number of Army personnel believe that the RAF Regiment were at fault, but I hope they are exonerated.

One question, however, when was it approriate to wear a woolly pully to Parliament? * What is wrong with the 'if you would wear a suit, wear your No 1s'. I know, i sound a grumpy old fool, but it looks sloppy.


* Never, I hope!

It would seem the forced retirements were not as uncalled for as some have opined.

I see it as someone was going to carry the can for the loss of the Harriers and the lives lost in the attack.

That being said.....some other careers should come to a screeching halt as well but at a much lower level in the chain of command.

Each Unit Commander has a responsibility to provide for physical security arrangements for his Troops and equipment.....there were some glaring failures in that regard.

Concertina barbed wire and other physical barriers are not in short supply in Afghanistan. Unit personnel can stand guard duty when not on their normal work assignments.....it is not easy, is fatiguing, and a proper pain in the ass.....but it has to be done.

Bulldozers and other earth moving equipment is in theater.....and could have been used to mold the ground around the Perimeter to afford better visibility from the Guard Towers and for other surveillance systems.

A proper response to the security survey would have addressed the weak points of the defense.

Complacency seems to be the root cause of the failures.....and the complete ignoring of the possibility of a small unit ground attack being one of the methods the Taliban would utilize.

What ever happened to a wise old soldier asking himself....."If I was the bad guys....how would I do this?". Then, fixing that weak point.

Also.....as I have posted before....the most important tactic to prevent such attacks is active and aggressive patrolling. The Report clearly points out the complete inadequacy of such measures and the lack of Commanders to properly address that lack of resources and capability.

It sounds to me like the Helicopter Units and the Osprey Unit had taken Squadron level measures to effectively guard their aircraft and personnel while the Harrier and other units had not.

A 'business case'......:\

BEagle,

I was initially tempted to use strong language in my reply but lets just say for those of us, old, bold and operational types seeing out our last few years, you can probably 'feel' the despair of how we face up to a typical day in our current modern RAF. :mad:

PA

I can feel the despair.

Colleague of mine has just had a JPA claim audited and almost rejected because he did not have a business case to support his travel claim. A claim that was a result of travelling to MPA, on duty, on work directed from the highest levels of Defence. But he didn't have a business case to travel - talk about a bureaucratic nightmare!! :ugh:

RP,

Yep - where I work requires the completion of a 5 page spreadsheet just to get an MT vehicle. It then has to be e-mailed to my Budget Manager for approval before being forwarded to MT, where it needs to arrive 3 days before the car is required!

Always sporting when my boss at Air asks if I can nip across to HWY for a short notice meeting!

:yuk:

What utter bolleaux with which to waste peoples' valuable time, PA and RP.

Was the F658 system so difficult?

Mind you, the logic of the system was pretty flawed in the last couple of years of my time. I had to go to High Wycombe for some meeting about a forthcoming exercise and was happy to use my own car, given that I live on the east (High Wycombe) side of Brize.

When the claim came back, 'they' had deducted 7 miles 'personal contribution'... So I rang to query this silliness.
...and lo, slowly but surely did the pins in the B&Y begin to move....:\

It's pretty straightforward; Why do you feel entitled to be paid expenses for more miles than you've driven.? Esteemed Members of Parliament are eating porridge for violating that principle.

To come back to the topic, this attack caused the biggest combat aircraft loss for a Western power for many decades. I'm astonished by the lack of an official UK enquiry and generally by the lack of interest and discussion of the event.

He doesn't! Perhaps you might read what he wrote before leaping in and making silly comment.

WRT the Bastion attack, how many UK enquires, reports and lessons do YOU think there have been so far?

2 blokes died and some kit was destroyed. Avoidable - possibly, but maybe not. Lessons to be learnt - definitely. Measured against loss of life in theatre so far - a small percentage but no less sad or tragic.

"Why don't you read what he wrote.." I have re- read it Roland and it gives the clear impression the claim was base to base while the journey was (slightly) shorter. Perhaps beagle will clarify otherwise?

"Some kit was destroyed" ... Er EIGHT Harriers, worst single hit on US air power since Vietnam. Masterful understatement. Did you work for Tony Blair?

ShotOne

Check your PMs!!

ShotOne, you are not in the military and you just don't understand what has been written. This may be a good point for you to back down as you are looking a bit silly with the fraud allegation when the post says nothing of the sort.

:ok:

No need to clarify anything. Rather than making stupid comments, perhaps you should read my post more carefully this time....

If (note use of the conditional) I'd gone to Brize and driven round the entrance roundabout, I would have been paid for 102 miles for the entire journey and it would have taken a total time of 2:06, according to Autoroute. However, because I elected to go direct and save 0:41 driving time, the miserable $ods would only pay for 68 miles rather than 75.

Is that simple enough for you to understand?

If they had been UK Harriers and UK personnel then a Service Inquiry would be mandated. But the losses sadly sustained were to a USMC unit. The USMC has done it's own investigation, I don't see why the UK should feel compelled to do more than it has.

My understanding is that the USMC are not blaming the UK for what happened, which might change the MOD response.

Beagle, no it's not. Are you saying it was an entirely arbitrary deduction of seven miles for no reason at all? If so that's outrageous and I'm very sympathetic. But if you're going to get huffy about discussing it, why did you raise it on a public forum...particularly when there's only the most tenuous link to the thread subject?

(Thanks for pm, Roland, replied)

ShotOne, you have no experience or knowledge of the military claims system yet you throw accusations around and keep on digging.

Really, you should just say sorry for the accusation and backdown with good grace.