PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   'AirTanker aims to solve European tanker shortage' (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/514463-airtanker-aims-solve-european-tanker-shortage.html)

BEagle 13th May 2013 08:21


How much difference is there in an F-18 tanking and a Typhoon?
That's what clearance trials should identify - it could be a little, it could be significant.

Also, was the full AAR envelope tested, or merely 'heart of the envelope'? In all representative configurations?

The approval process has every right to be cautious for approving release to service and any temporary restrictions which might be applied.

If Voyager arrives without a fully-functioning mission mangement system, I'd be curious as to whether non-rigorous legacy trail management techniques will be re-assessed by the UK MAA. For example, one such 'technique' requires the user to calculate a factor which can be thought of as K = 1/(a-b). Which becomes utterly meaningless when a = b as, in such a case, K = ∞....:\

BBadanov 13th May 2013 09:16

I just thinking if the RAAF can use a Spanish F-18 to clear using the drogues what's the *&^%$#@ problem? The pods can't be that different and the Typhoon can use the Italian B767s.

Dat, that is nowhere near what has happened. Spanish F-18 was use purely for DT&E for the HDUs and Portuguese F-16 for initial boom trials. These are not clearances.

Once KC-30A arrived in Oz, the Classic OT&E took place. Very intensive through the envelope as Beags described, over 2011-12, I guess. Then the Supers were done and finally cleared about 2 months ago.

This is a long drawn out process to ensure fit for service and safety, not as you suggest.

Onceapilot 13th May 2013 10:57

Quote BEagle
"If Voyager arrives without a fully-functioning mission mangement system, I'd be curious as to whether non-rigorous legacy trail management techniques will be re-assessed by the UK MAA. For example, one such 'technique' requires the user to calculate a factor which can be thought of as K = 1/(a-b). Which becomes utterly meaningless when a = b as, in such a case, K = ∞....http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...ies/wibble.gif"

Yes, the "unbelievable" bracket correction!:ooh:
I do hope they can rise to the challenge. The highly paid FSTA lackeys were certainly given all the info they needed to come up with a great solution. Personally, I would always prefer the mental picture and calculations way:)

OAP

BEagle 13th May 2013 12:24


The highly paid FSTA lackeys were certainly given all the info they needed to come up with a great solution. Personally, I would always prefer the mental picture and calculations way :)
Well, not particularly well paid non-FSTA 'lackeys' have developed a reliable trail planning and management system which has been in operational use in other Airbus tankers for several years now. Which does not use the archaic, mathematically non-rigorous methodology of the primitive 'RAPS'.....:ok:

Quite why AiM haven't been more interested in this reliable, combat-proven 'great solution' system already flying in their other tanker-transports? ICATQ! Perhaps 'No inventado aquí'??

cobalt42 17th May 2013 16:04

RTS
 
RTS today... 1st sorties due Monday with Tornado... allegedly :hmm:

Just This Once... 17th May 2013 17:13

That is good news, now we can say 'AirTanker aims to solve UK tanker shortage'… as we all hoped it would when we handed over all the money.

BEagle 17th May 2013 19:43


RTS today... 1st sorties due Monday with Tornado... allegedly :hmm:
Really? I'm surprised there's nothing about that on the major aviation websites - or even ATr's own website....:\

racedo 17th May 2013 21:22


I'm surprised there's nothing about that on the major aviation websites....................
Sounds like you dissing PPRune as not being major..............

BEagle 18th May 2013 06:40


Sounds like you dissing PPRuNe as not being major..............
Whatever. Like some $hit like that, blud.....

Random.


BBadanov 18th May 2013 09:09

is that chap on the right John Cleese??

BEagle 18th May 2013 09:16

No.





.

mr snow 19th May 2013 22:23

Good luck to the ATrS Madras tomorrow. No pressure!

BEagle 20th May 2013 18:44

Well, how did it go......??

:\

Easy Street 20th May 2013 22:04


Good luck to the ATrS Madras tomorrow.
Blimey, it has been a while since 10 Sqn was around. I had forgotten that there were other UK AAR callsigns besides Fagin and Tartan!

BEagle 21st May 2013 06:42

AirTanker Cleared To Begin Air-To-Air Refueling Operations

:ok:

I'm surprised that there's no information on the ATr website though.....

Onceapilot 21st May 2013 07:45

Ho-bloody-ray! So now we will see how effective this all singing and dancing money making contract is. Lets see...with those three aircraft, 20 crews and 18hrs a day utilisation they should be able to do everything. Well, thats what it says in this brochure :rolleyes:.

OAP

mr snow 21st May 2013 09:16

Very well. More today.

Art Field 22nd May 2013 20:58

At last ,10 Squadron, an honest job for you as you join a tanker fleet with a tradition of service that goes right back to 214 and it's Valiants and which I am sure you will make every effort to maintain though I am glad to be well clear of all that new organisation. Good Luck

ICM 23rd May 2013 09:02

Art: As a taxpayer, I'm delighted to hear news of the long-delayed AAR release but I'd also slip in a reminder that 10 Sqn's history in its AT role goes back a little further to May 1945 when the assets of 4 Group were transferred to Transport Command, and continued with service in India and Burma and on to the Berlin Airlift.

BEagle 23rd May 2013 10:40

10 Sqn flew in the AT/AAR role from 1993-2005, including operational service, so are hardly new to the AAR role!


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:32.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.