:ugh:FFS. Same old and bolds, the same defences being dug, the same tiresome debates. I'm sure there's another thread on here somewhere where you can discuss what could've and should've been.

Emergov - If you're out there, you posted on the last incarnation of this thread something about pay being looked at again. If you're in the know - it would be interesting to hear about what AAAvn is doing to address the bloody awful pay scales that new pilots will find themselves on. As well as anything else being done about retention.

Open question to AAAvn pilots - what would keep you in beyond your ROSO these days? Is it just more money? More flying? Better management of the SSO career path?

This has also happened to the RAAF. Before you keep banging on about AAvn, remember we do not have an operational air force. Our Hornets (airshow combat group) do not deploy at all; our transport fleet no longer undertakes operational air drops, only milk runs, and the Wedgetails are ran so late they have missed any chance to value-add to the last decade of coalition operations.

The only segment of the RAAF that actually performs in it's role is 92 wing.

AAvn might not be delivering the way they should be, due mainly to the mismanagement of DMO and lack of operational exposure (though they see far more action than the RAAF) but handing over to the RAAF will not solve a thing. Stating that we do not need to be capable of expeditionary combined force operations shows a complete lack of understanding of modern warfare and operations in our region. ALL operations to Australia's north are expeditionary by their very nature. All deployable air elements. The RAAF will become more accountable for delivered capability as time goes by costs increase. If it fails to deliver, as in the UK, it will be cut.


The notion of handing over an Armed Recon helicopter to the Navy shows a complete lack of understanding of the capability and how it supports land warfare outcomes. I would go one step further and put appropriately trained infantry soldiers behind the gun.

I respect your extensive service and experience BR71; I also understand your attachment to the Huey and it's downstream development, but frankly I am surprised you would make suggestions such as those above.


Felix
You probably won't get anyone posting. These pages are watched and they have been told to stay away.


Regardless, this is only a forum and nothing said here will ever, ever have any impact on the future of the ADF rotary fleet.

Bushranger 71
I know this is menial as a point in all this discussion, but the font you use now is awful. I find it almost unreadable, and now skim your posts rather than the detailed read they deserve.
Can you either change font, or if nor make it all BOLD before posting?

Hang in there Felix
 

I haven't got any news for you about pay and capability allowance Felix. It is being 'discussed'.


Don't hold your breath for any quality of discussion here. With the exception of you, 1981, and BR71 (despite his nostalgia), this thread will continue to spiral into chauvinist rants from ex FLTLT and FSGT who have never been within 20 miles of a capability decision, and who are incapable of differentiating between a 'discussion' between people with an opinion, a 'proposal' put to a decision maker, and an actual 'decision'.

Andu in particular seems to barely be on passing terms with the facts, and feels that an aside at the end of a bar-room chat is sufficient evidence to validate his opinion of Army Aviation.

My contribution is this:
Most if not all of what has been posted here since the thread went maverick is false. That minority of opinion which has some basis in fact is so utterly biased as to be laughable. The only difference between the efforts of RAAF RW and AAAvn is that AAAvn are fixed in place by three, gusting four major acquisitions/disposals, having had three squadrons fully engaged in generating detachments for operational deployment for the best part of 7 years.

RAAF have shown themselves quite capable of screwing this stuff up., At least BR71 displayed some lucidity in his post about the current problems with F18E, Wedgetail, and other air projects.

As for claims that we are all on some ASIO watch list, I for one have nothing to worry about, having fashioned a very comfortable and stylish tinfoil hat last week; wearing it right now. I have also bought twenty-three copies of Catcher in the Rye, for some reason...

Bushranger 71
That's much better. Thanks, always enjoy reading your posts.
John

Can I have an "amen" on that!!
Reducing the numbers of senior officers above unit command level by 50% would be a good start! A CO of mine recently stated that there are two ADFs; the one we work in and the other in Canberra.:mad:

I'm assuming many readers here would have seen General David Hurley's interview on Sky yesterday, where is said (carefully following the approved company line), that the ADF could still manage to deliver the goods, if with some delays in some projects, with the huge reduction in Defence funding.

I suspect I'm not the only one to think that he might have a slightly different slant on the warm, fuzzy, 'all is going swimmingly' line he took in that interview if he knew that what he was saying was strictly off the record.

I resemble that remark!

Recognition of Military Qualifications
 

Emergov: Hmm, I'd warrant that I'm the only ex-FSGT in this forum... chauvinist rants? :ouch:

I'm about to do some very expensive training in preparation for my impending departure from the ARA. The training I am doing is merely to convert my military multi-engine, command instrument rating and NVG rating to a civil multi-engine, command instrument rating and NVG rating. Seems a bit silly really. If the Australian Army (and the RAN and RAAF for that matter) is a Registered Training Organisation, I'm not sure why CASA can't provide greater recognition. Is it simply a case that the ADF has not engaged with CASA recently to achieve a better outcome?

Anyone know of any CASA ATOs who are in the ARES or ARA??

CW, that's a complaint about as old as the oldest contributor here. I can recall attending a lecture back in the 60s where the lecturer, a RAAF officer then in charge of production of RAAF let down plates and charts, (back then, on Hercs at least, we all carried two sets of plates, RAAF and Civil AIP plates), told us of his frustration dealing with (what was then called) DCA (today's CASA).

We'd asked why in the world the two agencies couldn't save the taxpayer a shed load of money by producing common enroute charts and let down plates. He said that the RAAF had been trying for years, but met with utter intransigence at every step from their opposite numbers at DCA - (who, almost to a man, were ex-RAAF with major chips on their shoulders, possibly because they were ex-RAAF).

I have to say that at the time, we thought that, for the common good and the potential savings that were to be made, the RAAF bloke should have persevered rather than throw his hands in the air and give up. However, after later personal "interaction" with the then DCA, (which just about everybody, and not just the RAAF, then "fondly" referred to as "the Gestapo"), I came to the conclusion that even a saint would have given up dealing with them.

I understand that it was a very similar situation when the military apprentice and trade schools first tried to get civil accreditation for their graduates. Although I'm pleased to learn that quite a bit of progress has been made in that area, as it damn well should be.

Australian Army Aviation Corps
 

The argument used to run that it wasn't in the ADF's interests to make it any easier for trained personnel to step out but given the cost of career transition training for senior aircrew across the three services, I would have thought there is a good financial impetus for the bean counters to try and make it happen.

This thread is awesome!
 

This thread is epic, awesome discussion being had!

Army and choppers: great idea, but in reality its my opinion it has been done poorly for too long.

Army needs rotary lift, and CAS/Armed recce without a doubt. But those capabilities are intensive to raise/train/sustain....and are increasingly complex and expensive today compared to a huey or a kiowa a couple of decades ago. Yeah, it would be perfect if the army could keep doing it alone, but it just might be getting too hard, if it were looked at in the cold hard light of day.

And CASA.....yeah ADF aviators who fly day to day as a military pilot, need to do english proficiency tests for example........because once you are out of a zoom bag you somehow forget how to speak properly. What a joke.

ADF / CASA
 

lastvarker

and, as I understand it, a current ADF pilot would also need a medical and a security clearance to be able to fly civilian aircraft. I guess the ADF really is another country

cheers
layman

Tap opening: From trickle to flood again?
 

Victoria Police, Careflight recruiting again. No idea how many positions. Bristow (up to 50 pilots :eek:) and maybe CHC starting again very soon.

I wonder how many Army pilots will join the 30-odd recent departures from the Corps?

Estimating a conservative figure of 10 to 15 that may go in the next 6 months, it will be interesting to see how it plays out. Will it coincide with a reduction in ROE for Black Hawk and therefore be absorbed without too much more hurt? Or will it force some other outcome?

When one looks at the lack or understanding and or the lack of interest by some, in the well being of their members. One can only presume that a lack of basic understanding still exists in the armed forces.

When the Air Force introduced the C130 into service in 1958, it reinstated the old WW2 aircrew position of Flight engineer. It also introduced a new position of Loadmaster. It was a paperwork action, designed to allow the aircraft to be safely flown. At least three of the engineers were from WW2 and so still had an entitlement to wear the engineers brevet. However the remaining fellows were not awarded any brevet for some time, and the poor old loadmaster and his engineer mate had to wait until 1964 before correct brevet became available.

The pay scale was only marginally better than what they got before they came on the job. Annual assessments were also unfair as at unit level one was judged by the units but final assessment was done by ones basic mustering and they had little or no interest with what was going on. Because the higher ups lack of support and action and because the base mausterings had lost interest in us, no sustantive promotions were forthcoming and the situation was partly solved in the mid seventies because political interest was starting to appear. In spite of that it took till 1983 for the matter to be resolved.

I see where some of you are puzzled that the pay and conditions are so poor but it took 25 years for the airman aircrew issue to be fixed when it could with good intent be fixed almost overnight.

There still appears today for people to leave in droves and yet the people who should have an interest sweep it under the carpet.

I am sure the army is the same, but I find it a crying shame that so many good people decide to leave leaving most of the dead heads behind.

It is not the facts that it is an old fart moaning, my goodness the same mistakes are being made from 30 years ago.

I wish you all the very best and the sooner our powers to be understand how change is needed the better for you and our country

Regards

Col

l

Centenary of Military Aviation Airshow 2014
 

I've just had a look at the website for the Centenary of Military Airshow 2014 which is going to be held at Point Cook in March.

RAAF sending 10 types, the RAN is sending 2 current types and 2 warbirds, the Army is sending.... Can anyone guess? Nothing.

Despite the Army being the organisation which kicked off military aviation in Australia, there are no Army aircraft participating in the airshow in either a flying or ground display.

I shouldn't be surprised I suppose. :embarrassed:

That's not very good.

People would like to see a tiger.

Tiger and MRH turned up to do a static display only. Apparently it was stood up at very short notice. I don't understand why Army are so reluctant to do flying displays.

Anyway, good to see them there. Particularly good to see blue berets being worn again! :cool:

I agree, can't believe they didn't fly.

The MRH looked damn good flying to Pt Cook.