PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   RAF Coppering up the pennies (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/494329-raf-coppering-up-pennies.html)

Yozzer 31st Aug 2012 09:16

RAF Coppering up the pennies
 
The latest sign of desperation in RAF Finance is two officers assigned by CAS direction for six months to validate AIP awards since 2004 and staff recovery of wrongly awarded AIPs. It is likely to cost more in their salaries then they could ever hope to recoupe.

FWIW, I tried to get my second AIP a few years ago as I held two of the documented qualifications required for the award and had no joy whatsoever as the differing Qs were required to be obtained at different rank levels, and I had already claimed one. The 'So what' is that the application procedure appeared absolutely watertight; free of human interpretation or perception and therefore impossible; or so it seemed, to claim unless 100% entitled.

I am assuming that this development is being driven by a significant abuse of the system probably by an entire trade group; but how it could have come about is beyond me. For sure if SP have made a genuine application for an AIP and it has been approved by the adminers, it seems a little harsh for the suggestion of fraud and risk of repaying what could be an eight year pay rise to be thrown at them at this stage. AIP cannot be processed by an individual alone.

The 'Tax payer' in me thinks that the SO2 assigned would be better employed elsewhere. Likewise, if we have resorted to 'coppering up' the loose change, what hope have we got of a bright future. This will have everybody who has claimed either of the two permisseable AIP watching their back which will do much for improved morale. :confused:

Wensleydale 31st Aug 2012 09:25

I didn't think that Aeronautical Information Publications were that controversial....

jayc530 31st Aug 2012 09:37

I thought the defence budget had been balanced?

BBC News - Defence budget 'balanced' - Philip Hammond

Courtney Mil 31st Aug 2012 09:45

Oh good. Another witch hunt. The morale meter in CAS's office must have been reading too high.

Rossian 31st Aug 2012 10:20

AIP??
 
...OK I give in - I know I've been out for a bit, but what is AIP??

The Ancient Mariner

Pontius Navigator 31st Aug 2012 10:33

One of my Sgts qualified for one when he was a cpl then as a sgt got a degree and qualified again.

I think he also got a cash award from Air Command.

Good man, 2 degrees in 4 years and left to teach at a primary school.

Tiger_mate 31st Aug 2012 10:46

AIP = Accelerated Incremental Progression.

Everybody is entitled to two during their career. To qualify you must complete and sucesfully graduate from a qualifying course. There are very few qualifying courses and all are documented. I would suggest that its inception was to encourage career development in completing courses that the service needed people to go for such as QFI/CSRO etc. I too believe that the administration to achieve an AIP is robust enough to stand the scrutiny of an auditor. Whoever shortcut this system has a good story to tell! ...for it does suggest that the gate is being bolted after a chap succesfully fled the field. IBN 33/12 refers.

WPH 31st Aug 2012 14:47

Is AIP available to Officers? I thought that it was NCOs only.

Avtur 31st Aug 2012 14:56

Available to all

Red Line Entry 31st Aug 2012 15:15

JSP 754 Section 03.0602:


...AIP does not apply to officers.

rockiesqiud 31st Aug 2012 15:52

How are they going to reclaim the money from those of us leaving today? And what is the justification to change the goal posts? I put in for my 2nd AIP in good faith and it was approved by my OC. Will the money reclaimed pay for anything useful? Doubt it

muttywhitedog 31st Aug 2012 18:26

On the other hand, they will be paying out to one of my MTDs who submitted an AIP in June 06 only for some chimp not to put it onto JPA correctly and she has been one increment down for 6 years!

Stuff 31st Aug 2012 20:44

We covered the cause of this back in May http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...een-years.html

If you read the IBN that came with the audit it said that would decide what recovery action, if any, would happen after the audit was complete.

Sounds like the beancounters want a number more than they want the money.

ukcds 31st Aug 2012 21:08

I'm sure in the interest of fair play honesty and integrity, they will also trawl through all those people who are entitled to an AIP but has as yet not claimed it ......Or B

TheWizard 31st Aug 2012 21:24


Originally Posted by Tiger_mate (Post 7388412)
AIP = Accelerated Incremental Progression.

I would suggest that its inception was to encourage career development in completing courses that the service needed people to go for such as QFI/CSRO etc.

Just so nobody gets false hopes, CSRO was never subject to an AIP.

Tiger_mate 31st Aug 2012 22:06

I only know of one person who has managed to get both his AIPs, and one was Q-CSRO as a Sgt and then QHCI as a FS. Other options for WSOps included Q-SAR and that was about it. AP 3392 Vol7 Leaflet 802 which whilst almost certainly a legacy document now, was the reference at the time.

Remember you must apply for these at differing ranks. I also had CSRO and QHCI but could only claim once as both were achieved at the same rank. Unfair methinks but it is what it is and as I suggested earlier; the application process is very black and white.

Avtur 1st Sep 2012 01:38

red Line Entry
 
Thanks Limitation, Glad to see there are people with the capacity to provide immediate and accutate references to such inpotrtant matters.

TheWizard 1st Sep 2012 16:45


Originally Posted by Tiger_mate (Post 7389472)
I only know of one person who has managed to get both his AIPs, and one was Q-CSRO as a Sgt and then QHCI as a FS. Other options for WSOps included Q-SAR and that was about it. AP 3392 Vol7 Leaflet 802 which whilst almost certainly a legacy document now, was the reference at the time.

Remember you must apply for these at differing ranks. I also had CSRO and QHCI but could only claim once as both were achieved at the same rank. Unfair methinks but it is what it is and as I suggested earlier; the application process is very black and white.

That must have been a very long time ago then. Never heard of Q-CSRO before (25 years serving).
AIPs have always been trade group specific (inc Airman Aircrew/NCA) and as far as I am aware CSRO (as was) isn't.
I know, as I tried to claim as a CSRO and got told to do one!!
JSP754 Annex Ch 3 Section 6 refers.
At least your friend will be pre 2004 and he won't get a request for the Government's money back if he did indeed get his AIP approved! :ok:

GalleyTeapot 1st Sep 2012 21:03

Claiming both AIPs wasn't difficult, you can claim both as a Sgt if you wish and have the quals, or do as I did and claim one as Sgt and one as FS. They re-worded the JSP for WSOp (EW) after I complained to the trade sponsor that the qual I been working for, after being told by Kinloss that AIP was available for that qual, to find it wasn't on the list when I applied for it.

sitigeltfel 4th Sep 2012 10:38

Meanwhile the Royal Navy have launched "Operation Clawback". How does someone not notice a £17k overpayment?

Sailors' wages docked after £1.2m MoD error - Telegraph

I suppose the government needs the money to pay MPs expenses :rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:33.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.