PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Would it have been any good? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/472367-would-have-been-any-good.html)

Oldsarbouy 22nd Dec 2011 17:27

Would it have been any good?
 
http://i585.photobucket.com/albums/s...n/P1010020.jpg

Sun Who 22nd Dec 2011 17:30

Yes.

I had the privilege of assessing it for UK use, as a SAR platform.

With some minor modifications it would have been awesome. Tricky for very small boats, cragfast climbers etc, but definitely doable and its other capabilities would have more than made up for its shortcomings.

Just my view.:)

Sun.

Trim Stab 22nd Dec 2011 18:23

For mountain rescue I suspect it would arrive really quickly, then bury everybody in an avalanche...

[email protected] 22nd Dec 2011 18:47


Tricky for very small boats, cragfast climbers etc
or anywhere else where downwash is an issue when winching (which is a majority of UK SAROPs) - exactly what 'minor modifications' would be needed to turn this into an 'awesome' SAR aircraft.

Speed and range are but a small part of the picture if the downwash of the aircraft requires ridiculous hover heights (with the associated loss of hover references) to enable a safe and effective winching configuration to be achieved.

PS in what capacity were you asked to assess this as a suitable SAR platform?

Rigga 22nd Dec 2011 19:14

"...or anywhere else where downwash is an issue when winching..."

I seem to remember the very same statements made against the introduction of the Seaking to replace Whirlwinds and Wessex.

The only difference was a longer winch line.

llamaman 22nd Dec 2011 19:32

Rigga,

Spot-on re. Sea King. There's always a percentage of people who are very quick to right-off anything new (e.g. every single new type while I've been in service!).

Downwash and hover attitude are definitely issues for the Merlin but by no means insurmountable. IMHO these would be most definitely outweighed by the advantages the airframe would bring, regardless the 'it hovers too high for references' argument is lame. A B737 autopilot with extremely good auto-hover and rad-alt holds would no doubt come into it's own in certain circumstances. I know if I'd just been winched off a ship in desperate need of medical attention that 148kts cruise speed with stacks of fuel (even more in the 3A) and an excellent icing clearance would more than make up for the ex Sea-King pilot grumbling that 'it hovers too nose high'!

With a decent radar I think it would make a very effective SAR platform, now cost would be another issue!

Just my tuppence worth.

llamaman

alfred_the_great 22nd Dec 2011 20:16

can you not use the auto-hover/transition capability of a Merlin in SAR Ops? I would ask our WAFUs, but we're on leave.

llamaman 22nd Dec 2011 20:20

Yes, you could.

oldgrubber 22nd Dec 2011 20:50

Reading this and personal experience with the Royal Navy version I would say yes it would have been good. Despite the early problems there are times when only the Cormarant can get airborne in the extreme conditions in Canada.


'Most Challenging' Mountainside Helicopter Rescue Wins Cormorant Trophy | Aero-News Network

Spanish Waltzer 22nd Dec 2011 21:05

Paint it grey & red and you may get your wish. :oh::mad::oh:

Sun Who 22nd Dec 2011 21:11

Crab said:


PS in what capacity were you asked to assess this as a suitable SAR platform?
I was the RWOETU rearcrew SAR desk officer. Work it out.

Sun.

P.S.

Crab, ever winched in an EH101, over the water? I have.

sycamore 22nd Dec 2011 21:22

If you have a good crew ,you don`t need hover references,you just listen to the `mouth-music`......!

Jollygreengiant64 22nd Dec 2011 21:49

'til someone steps on it.:}

Just This Once... 23rd Dec 2011 06:48

Leaving a yellow DIRCM pod on the model was a nice touch.

Thone1 23rd Dec 2011 07:19

The Danish Air Force is using it, having retired their very last Sea Kings last year.

They seem to be working well with them.

Thomas

[email protected] 23rd Dec 2011 09:30

Ah Sun Who? possibly small, loud, recently retired radop????

Since 90 plus% of UK SAR involves rescuing less than 3 people, how is that extra size, downwash and expense going to make itself useful??

I believe you actually weren't that complementary about it when you did the trials!

The move from the Wessex to Sea King did involve increasing hover heights to mitigate the downwash but the Merlin has a very concentrated downwash due to disc loading and blade design that takes it into another league entirely.

I guess those that dismiss decent hover references as unimportant must be such Gods that the rest of us poor mortal SAR pilots are not worthy:{

Sun Who 23rd Dec 2011 09:47

Crab,


Ah Sun Who? possibly small, loud, recently retired radop????
Nope, keep guessing. I'd hope my spelling and grammar were too good for the chap you're thinking of. My log book says you and I last flew together on 23 May 2002 - Sits, Rad/FCS and Dex;)

Hopefully we can keep this friendly, I remember us getting on very well in person.:)

I don't think EH101 or variant would have been good for all scenarios, and the rotorwash does take management. However, as a solution to the 'large platform' requirement of a two type SAR-H force, I think it could have been pretty impressive. Hence my answer to the OP's question - would it have been any good?

Having also had exposure to the AW139, I could counter that the cab on that platform was too small. I can't think of a 'perfect' SAR cab (a fast Sea king maybe?) but I do believe the way the Danes configured the EH101 for SAR resulted in a pretty impressive effort.

Sun.

Senior Pilot 23rd Dec 2011 09:54


Originally Posted by [email protected] (Post 6917233)
The move from the Wessex to Sea King did involve increasing hover heights to mitigate the downwash

By a huge 10 feet :p

As did the Whirlwind to Wessex before it, but no-one seemed to find these changes a deal breaker when put against the overall improvements :hmm:

llamaman 23rd Dec 2011 10:04

Crab,

I'm not sure anyone was dismissing decent hover references as being advantageous, just that the Merlin (hypothetically) would be a good SAR cab if operated correctly as I'm sure the Danes and Canadians will testify. If the requirement is to only rescue 3 at short range then why bother with the Sea King in the first place?

A mixed fleet would offer best flexibility, it's nice to see that the Government have gone for that option with the civilian contract.

Whatever platforms they go for, I'm sure plenty of 'experts' in this forum will be very quick to dismiss them.

llamaman

[email protected] 23rd Dec 2011 12:19

Sun Who - that does narrow it down to a choice of 2 but the small, loud one who was also in the post you held did fly the Merlin extensively and was less than impressed with its suitability for UK SAR due to the downwash.

Whether or not it is good for the Canadians or the Danes is irrelevant for UK SAR since our requirements are clearly different.

I agree llamaman that a mixed fleet is the way forward - it is what we had with Whirlwind and Wessex and also with Wessex and Sea King but we were forced into a 'one size fits all' fleet with the Sea King.

The Sea King brought a huge increase in capability over the Wessex into all- weather, day and night SAR - any new helicopter will not bring such a quantum change in capability, just enhance what we have in terms of speed.

The Merlin didn't make the cut in the first evolution of SARH - very unlikely I would think to see it in Pt 2. I also think the Danes and particularly the Canadians might not be that satisfied with it on reliability and availability grounds regardless of whether or not it fulfills the role well.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.