PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   1 Jan Officer Promotions (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/438228-1-jan-officer-promotions.html)

sidewayspeak 1st Jan 2011 14:47

1 Jan Officer Promotions
 
RAF - Officer Promotions - 1 Jan 2011

Not many promoted. :sad:

Little incentive to strive anymore. But musn't grumble, have a job at least; for now.

ICBM 1st Jan 2011 15:02

... or perhaps the message has been finally heard and we're not promoting for the sake of it; instead giving promotion based on merit and, dare I say, competence?

CHUNKYEWO 1st Jan 2011 15:09

Promotions
 
No Flt Lt to Sqn Ldr in the flying branch?

London Eye 1st Jan 2011 16:18

Flt lt to sqn ldr now selected on requirement from a merit-order list which is created by the promotion selection boards. The aspiration is to move to the same system for all ranks idc, which will presumably see the end of the Jan and Jul lists. A better system in practice but we will all miss the opportunity to check the bi-annual "what 'im" list.

QTRZulu 1st Jan 2011 16:19

Yet more than a handful promoted to Wg Cdr and Gp Capt :confused:

Not trying to say that those lucky enough to be picked up did not deserve it, but why so many Flying Branch promotions in the current climate of fleet reductions, planned scaling down of HQs etc?

When most other trades are being told to expect little or no promotion for years to come, can this really be justified in the eyes of the workers?

ICBM 1st Jan 2011 17:09

I don't think you can look at the weightings in this list and make light of economics. At first glance one could deduce that we must have needed more Wg Cdrs and Gp Capts this round. In contrast the next round could be mostly made up (for the most part) of Flt Lt - Sqn Ldr promotions. What then? PPruners crying that we don't have any suitable people for promotion to SO1 or higher? These things are always an 'Ebb and Flow' deal and not worth too much brain work or enthusiasm from one's armchair ;)

Melchett01 1st Jan 2011 17:45

It's an incomplete list - it doesn't show any of the flt lt - sqn ldr promotions. And whilst they are reduced in comparison to previous years, there have been promotions to sqn ldr.

This may have something to do with a change to how the flt lt promotions are handled. Rather than having a bi-annual list, individuals are notified that they have been provisionally selected for promotion, but they will go into a specific appointment at some point in the next 12 months rather than being promoted off a list and then the desk having to scrabble round to find a post to put them in to. Just a theory, might be wrong, could just the website administrators have made a mistake.

Dengue_Dude 1st Jan 2011 17:59

Does that mean that both remaining officers were promoted yesterday?

Well it will mean that soon won't it?

Jimlad1 1st Jan 2011 18:04

"Not trying to say that those lucky enough to be picked up did not deserve it, but why so many Flying Branch promotions in the current climate of fleet reductions, planned scaling down of HQs etc?"

Depends on the age of the branch and their manpower plot - it could be that there are a number of retirements etc which need to be covered this year.

I know that another service is aware that even though its manpower is falling, in a couple of years time it will have to do a bumper promotion board at one level to replace the manpower who are retiring, and whose posts were continuing post SDSR. Ironic isnt it - smaller service = more promotion :-)

StopStart 1st Jan 2011 19:07

This is all well and good but I have to ask: what on earth is the AEROSPACE BATTLE MANAGER BRANCH?? :rolleyes:

davejb 1st Jan 2011 19:29

Oh for goodness sake, do try to keep up!

They're the people that manage battles in, errr, aeropspace....yeah...

BEagle 1st Jan 2011 19:29

I understand that it's the 'AWACS Passenger Branch'.....:\

nuSpeak wanquewords for 'Fighter Controller Branch' in old money.

Mr C Hinecap 1st Jan 2011 19:31

Perhaps to more accurately reflect their role now, given they don't just control fighters.

glad rag 1st Jan 2011 19:53

ROFL, the rot set in with "Options" now it's finally permeated upwards.

You reap what you sow.

Easy Street 2nd Jan 2011 02:07


Perhaps to more accurately reflect their role now, given they don't just control fighters.
Thread drift warning - Mr C is right, ABMs do control many varieties of air traffic now. You may notice that that sentence included the words Air, Traffic and Control. Heresy when suggested to an ABM, but since their day-to-day role on current ops is keeping aircraft apart instead of bringing them together, the old distinctions between the branches are more blurred than ever! At least from the end user's point of view...

(pin safely pulled; retiring)

Mr C Hinecap 2nd Jan 2011 06:45

Oh - as far as promotions go.....less people leaving early as less of a job market out there to go to (for all), smaller force for the future, iminent reduction of numbers (redundancy) etc all mean less promotions for all.

minigundiplomat 2nd Jan 2011 14:24


less people leaving early as less of a job market out there to go to (for all),
Not true. Either you are in the wrong trade, or not looking hard enough.

Granted there isnt a boom, but there are jobs.

Alber Ratman 2nd Jan 2011 18:13

Try and get one then..:E

Father Jack Hackett 2nd Jan 2011 19:34

Not au fait with Airspace Battle Manager branch myself but if it's the same bunch who operated as "Crowbar" a while back then good on 'em - an extremely capable outfit.

Mr C Hinecap 2nd Jan 2011 19:46


Not true. Either you are in the wrong trade, or not looking hard enough.
Argue all you like - you usually complain that black is actually white. Just in case you didn't know, there is a recession on. Yes, there are jobs out there and some people are doing very well. However, across the Armed Forces as a whole, there is a slow down on people leaving at option points / before retirement - this is put down to the uncertainty of the civilian workplace and reduced recruitment elsewhere.

People are not leaving because there is less to go to, so promotion also gets hit. I didn't say there were no jobs - I said there were less :rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:41.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.