PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Harrier Last Flight (Merged) (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/436451-harrier-last-flight-merged.html)

F3sRBest 13th Dec 2010 13:23

Out of Trim,

if not scrapped the assets will remain on the MoD's balance sheet and they will still get charged for them by the Treasury..... you couldn't make this stuff up!

dctyke 13th Dec 2010 13:40

Out of Trim:

To keep them in any sort of readiness state would take almost as many technicians and support as it takes to keep them flying.

And if we pulled them out at short notice who the hell would fly them? Blackadder and the 20 minuters comes to mind, in fact I'd bet on it being nearer 5!

tyne 13th Dec 2010 14:31

Guys I'm going to miss you over Wigtown Bay. Sad to think I'll never hear the Pegasus roar again. Thanks from the little kid who'se first memory of a warplane is a GR3 at Wittering - and who'se latest is seeing that last RN Harrier land on ARKR.

It was a pleasure to meet a few of you the other week in Ark. Sad to think certain pubs of Stamford (and wardrooms) will no longer hear your stories.

I am a civvy so have no business posting here.

Dan.

Epsilon minus 13th Dec 2010 14:56

The Coalition Government
 
Forgive them
For they know not
What they do?

airpolice 13th Dec 2010 15:55

Forgive them nothing.
 
Oh I think they know very well what they are doing.

At some point the country will wake up and give the government of the day a clear mandate to re-arm the forces. This will of course involve building more aircraft which will be tarted up with the promise of British jobs but no matter what they buy, there will be a way for the UK defence industry to be part of it.

Engines or avionics or assembly, you can bet that at some point our current and recently ex lords and masters will have a finger in the till of whatever company gets that deal.

Why keep aircraft that have been paid for when you can make the MOD buy new stuff from your next employer?

Lukeafb1 13th Dec 2010 16:08

I vividly remember being one of a party of 92nd Entry Halton Apprentices on a visit to Duxford in 1959 (just possibly, 1960). We were treated to a flight of one of the prototypes. When I say ‘flight’, I exaggerate! In fact its maximum altitude possible, was about 6 feet, since it was tethered to the pan by four ruddy great chains! Still, very impressive all the same.:{:{

muppetofthenorth 13th Dec 2010 17:00


To keep them in any sort of readiness state would take almost as many technicians and support as it takes to keep them flying.
That can't be right. The USAF doesn't have several thousands techies at Davis-Monthan, keeping all of the hundreds of aircraft at readiness. Some are closer than others, but almost all are recoverable.

Not_a_boffin 13th Dec 2010 18:42

Err, no. They're not. Whilst a proportion are in storage to balance airframe hours, the vast majority are in parts reclaim status or there to be scrapped.

As others have posted, even those that are regenerated from Davis-Monthan take months and that's where there are aircrew and maintainers trained, certified and ready to use them. Re-creating the corporate knowledge, once stood down takes years.

Out of Trim - plan B was deferred as a savings measure.........

dctyke 14th Dec 2010 06:30

I may be wrong but the last time the RAF tried balancing ac hours was with Lightnings at Binbrook when I was on Lightning Augmentation Flight (LAF). About 50 of us looked after around 20 ac in various states of storage that were rotated thought 5, 11 and LTF. Most of the airframes never flew again although many man hours was spent on their upkeep. Storing a jet ac is not the same as putting your classic car up on jacks in the garage I'm afraid.

Rhys S. Negative 14th Dec 2010 07:19


I vividly remember being one of a party of 92nd Entry Halton Apprentices on a visit to Duxford in 1959 (just possibly, 1960). We were treated to a flight of one of the prototypes.
I presume you must mean Dunsfold. The first tethered hover was on 21-Oct-1960.

Rhys.

TEEEJ 14th Dec 2010 09:45

Some images of the Harrier camouflage scheme from yesterday.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5002/...1cb73f9d_z.jpg
DSC_0224HARRIERZG506COTTESM by llihmot, on Flickr

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5207/...6619b1cc_z.jpg
0045HARRIERGR9COTTESMORE13D by llihmot, on Flickr

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5165/...4bce52ae_z.jpg
DSC_0161HARRIERZG50613DEC10 by llihmot, on Flickr

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5081/...1d9effae_z.jpg
DSC_0153HARRIERSUNSETCR by llihmot, on Flickr

TJ

philrigger 14th Dec 2010 11:10

FLYPAST
 
Harrier fly past rehearsal today.

Not sure of complete timings but overflying Wyton between 1445 and 1455
(confirmed).

kiwibrit 14th Dec 2010 13:56

Saw them overfly Lincoln just now. Diamond formation plus one shepherding aircraft. Superb.

White Noise 14th Dec 2010 13:59

Harrier Fly Past
 
16 ship Harrier fly past of RAF stations today. I'd like to say it is was good value for money, however the value is sentimental (hardly justifiable) and not helped by the flypast happening 4 minutes early, whereby most people missed it.

forget 14th Dec 2010 14:02

I think you'll find it was a rehearsal for tomorrow. :)

CathayBrat 14th Dec 2010 14:18

Hope it was a rehersal, they just went over head here at woodhall spa, v impressive, but would be better lower!

kiwibrit 14th Dec 2010 14:19

Rehearsal - as noted elsewhere in the forum. Superb flypast over Lincoln.

barotraumatized 14th Dec 2010 18:14

iRaven

I'm afraid quoting post SDSR MOD 'lines to take' doesn't quite cut it with me or the rest of those in favour of the 'capability' argument winner.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this one....

glad rag 14th Dec 2010 20:42

Well, I hope the CO's fund picked up the tab for some tinnies for the painters.

Great Job.:D:D:D:D

I wish them well for the future.







[this REALLY sux, doesn't it]

Willard Whyte 14th Dec 2010 21:25

Since they did so well today, why waste cash makin' 'em fly tomorrow?


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.