PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Can someone explain what went wrong here please? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/432297-can-someone-explain-what-went-wrong-here-please.html)

Razor61 31st Oct 2010 10:05

Can someone explain what went wrong here please?
 
YouTube - SH-60 Near Crash

SH-60 apparently with SEAL's onboard comes in and nearly prangs it big time.
Was it due to the fact they may have had more bank than they should have and lost all lift or was it another factor?

Amazing recovery anyway and the rotors must have been inches from touching the ground atleast twice.

Flap62 31st Oct 2010 10:25

Not being a helo man even I can see what caused that - the cameras were there!

Pontius Navigator 31st Oct 2010 10:31

Looks as if the ground rose more suddenly than he expected?

BOAC 31st Oct 2010 10:33

Razor - the technical term is 'cock-up'.

Barry Bernoulli 31st Oct 2010 10:38

Could it have been the same thing that caused this?

YouTube - Black Hawk Crash

BossEyed 31st Oct 2010 18:47

Not the same incident, SP.

airborne_artist 1st Nov 2010 10:39

The handling pilot was on a promise that night, and his brain was not in the cockpit.

No other sensible explanation.

ShyTorque 1st Nov 2010 11:07

Insufficient application of power to arrest an increasing rate of descent caused by a steeply banked turn at high all up weight appears to be the only logical answer.

Can't understand why it occurred as the aircraft appeared to have sufficient power immediately after the event.

charliegolf 1st Nov 2010 11:13


Can't understand why it occurred as the aircraft appeared to have sufficient power immediately after the event.
Perhaps the whole situation had the pilot's undivided attention by then!:ok:

CG

Not everyone is blessed with your God-given skill and aplomb Shy.
(Cheque to the usual?)

Wizzard 1st Nov 2010 12:13

What the two incidents have in common - allegedly - is that they were carrying Special Forces and as one who has worked with "them" before I can vouch how easy it is to get carried away with their enthusiasm or as they would put it "mission focus"

They were so focused one dark night in Germany that they jettisoned my doors instead of opening them:rolleyes:

That might be the background to the OP but the real reason of course is:


the cameras were there!

chinook240 1st Nov 2010 18:30


Insufficient application of power to arrest an increasing rate of descent caused by a steeply banked turn at high all up weight appears to be the only logical answer.
Have to agree it looks that way, possibly insufficient power to arrest an increasing ROD, he's got a large coning angle just as he strikes the ground suggesting he's pulling collective like a b#%&*d.

Sun Who 1st Nov 2010 18:46

My guess:
Aggressive approach looking for a late flare to zero-zero.
Visual approach not taking info from rad or bar-alt and confused by low contrast, low feature surface which deceived the pilot into thinking he was higher than he was. Exacerbated by the approach being over lower ground than the LZ.

Sun.

heliboy999 3rd Nov 2010 15:54

Looks like from the direction the dust blows after the near miss, the wind was blowing away from the camera and the helicopter looked like he was turning into wind but instead turns crosswind with what looks like a "slipping" turn, It looks like a case of Incipient Vortex ring or settling with power which would semi dissipate as the helicopter closed with the ground but the rate of decent has grown too much for the power required.
The Coning angles on the rotor show that there was a huge amount of power but it would have been interesting to see what engine/transmission limits had be well and truly busted by the recovery.
My interpretaion but happy to learn fom any other ideas.

:8

ShyTorque 3rd Nov 2010 16:50

I don't agree that it was VR related.

Also, if you look carefully and stop the video incrementally, the coning angle initially seems quite low but increases markedly just as the aircraft has first "touched" down.

I reckon he was just too late on the collective.

Navy pilots.... :rolleyes:

;)

Buster Hyman 3rd Nov 2010 22:01

Give him his due...he didn't "punch out"...

AH7 4th Nov 2010 21:56

The reason for this near huge crash is a simple POF issue. When using lets say 60 deg angle of bank we now have total reaction tilted over in this case to the right. Due to this total reaction we have a total rotor thrust horizontal and a reduced total rotor thrust vertical, which is key. To maintain height he would need to increase that TRT vertical by about twice as much. 60 deg AOB has the effect of increasing the AUM by 100%. This bloke clearly did not know this and if he was heavy or high he would not have enough power to maintain height. Sorry if this bores you but that is the reason.....!!!!!:O

peeush 6th Nov 2010 15:23

I think he just lost sight of his priority too close to mother earth- may be he was looking inside OR somewhere else when the descent set in. He was too close to the ground for such a diversion (if there was any). Anyway, he has lived to be more careful next time and given us experience without getting into a tight spot!!

MightyGem 6th Nov 2010 19:32

I think that it's more likely he was just trying too hard to put on a show for the audience.


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:37.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.