PPRuNe Forums - Forum Title

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)

- Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)

- - Forum Title (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/405862-forum-title.html)

Fire 'n' Forget

16th Feb 2010 16:14

Quote:

and the backroom boys and girls without whom nothing would leave the ground

I am surprised 'Cocktail Party Cruise Lines' have not put in a forum title change request to justify the inclusion of the carriers yet :}

SASless

16th Feb 2010 16:24

Aw...give a guy a break....it is my second language you know Guv! :oh:

'Merican being my first!

sisemen

18th Feb 2010 08:47

Quote:

Maybe the resident Troll has a point

Troll??? Not me guv. Yer must be confusing me with someone else

Quote:

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...****_again.jpg

Nope. It's not the usual slangfest between the two winged master race and the rest - it's more of a philosophical discussion as to the title of the forum that most accurately reflects what goes on here.

Personally, I don't really give a stuff as I have a foot in both camps, as it were. I just think that the word "aviation" covers a broader church than "aircrew"

Data-Lynx

18th Feb 2010 10:27

Aircrew?

According to the UK Border Agency under "CRM2.1 Legislation and aircrew", Section 33(1) of the Immigration Act 1971 defines crew members as:

Quote:

all persons actually employed in the working or service of an aircraft, including the captain.

All you need is an 'official flying badge' and UK identification with a current photograph. It goes on to specifically disclude snowdrops and other security types, so it cannot be all bad.

Gnd	18th Feb 2010 16:59

Quote:

Officers Mess, RAF PPRuNe

Would that mean it becomes even more RAF bias as I presume NCOs would not be invited? Figures!

All times are GMT. The time now is 18:30.

Page 2 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page