PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   The Lady protests too much (lynx v Gaz). (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/38954-lady-protests-too-much-lynx-v-gaz.html)

angrycat 23rd Nov 2001 03:29

The Lady protests too much (lynx v Gaz).
 
Specifically to Lynx pilots. Why the problem with Gazelle pilots. A different helicopter is not hard to convert to , or is it the usual my belly is bigger than yours story.
Wake up and smell the coffee the lynx as well as the gazelle has no military purpose whatsoever. The sonner both are gone the better.

I.P Stop 23rd Nov 2001 20:38

Nice subject- "I don't think"
What are you hunting for angry? :p

SlimJim 23rd Nov 2001 23:37

Well, hang on!

Without the Lynx half the Dutch navy at sea would be stuck without mail and spare parts. The captain hates being wet & miserable when transferring from one ship to another. The pilot might even spot a submarine when he's flying around!

Redbeard 25th Nov 2001 23:27

:cool:
love the grand old lady ;)

Jetscream 32 26th Nov 2001 03:38

Angrycat you nonse - you wouldn't have said that in 91, in sunnier climes?

Best get some hours under your belt before you start belly-aching? :o

Tigs 26th Nov 2001 14:17

Jetscream
Do you have to have hours under your belt before you can start belly-aching? Angrycat has got a point it's the same old elitism bo*****s going on, we're better than you nah! nah! nah! nah! nah!. If flight crews have the apptitude and they can do the job, then let them do it. Bye the way i've got plenty of hours, and they are 'quality hours'.

Jetscream 32 26th Nov 2001 18:21

Tigs,

My response is based around the comment that neither cabs are needed! :rolleyes:

Low and Slow 26th Nov 2001 20:17

"the lynx as well as the gazelle has no military purpose whatsoever"

WHAT A COMPLETE CROCK! :mad:

What the hell is the alternative to Lynx? Lynx AH/HAS has some very specifi qualities that RAF SH cannot replicate.

Yes, I know I've over reacted to silly wind-up but I've been away and am out of practice

b34n 28th Nov 2001 00:59

done both now and cant fault the original comment " no military use whatsoever " what does the LUH do that a cheaper alternative can`t? and after the recent fiasco of shuffle the pack, who really cares...after all we are just really building hours for the 22 yr point in the end, unless of course you really believe that the AAC "manage" anyones career? One used to believe that our corps cared about the people it had serving......now its QHI`s and apache pilots who run the corps??....or am I wrong?

Tigs 28th Nov 2001 19:53

Jetscream
Fairdoos Chumster!

barneyrubble 29th Nov 2001 01:50

Tigs,
What are quality hours?, are they like the sweets, you only pick the ones you like or to ask another way, what arn't quality hours :rolleyes:

Tigs 30th Nov 2001 22:34

Barneyrubble,
What a quality question. I guess the type of flying that does not fall into the category of quality hours would be the type where you are sat reading the newspaper on the flight deck, or perhaps even having a snooze. In the weeds, hands on, no alt hold, no auto pilot, fast and furious etc etc blah blah, now they are quality hours.

barneyrubble 30th Nov 2001 23:39

Tigs, done that thousands of times, good fun but not very productive. :cool:

Tigs 3rd Dec 2001 16:12

Barney
So have I, I know it's not productive but it's bloody good fun though eh!

Murphy 4th Dec 2001 02:46

WOW!!!! You two must be GREAAAAT!!! :rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:13.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.