Compensation Outrage yet again ....
 

Just watched the News at Ten .. re this story ......

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...8/narmy118.xml

I am outraged, how many of our troops have got to give so much for so little in return ?

I'm with Jim Davidson on this one , fair treatment and compensation for our boys and girls.

Maybe if he had been sexually discriminated against or broke a finger nail typing he might have got more!!!

Sorry, 484k for RSI?! :eek:

Outraged!
 

You are usually outraged about something RC.

Fully agree however. BTW have you been posted yet?

I think the compensation paid to service personnel is criminal and the more the issue is raised the better, but then again don't hold your breath. With noo lairbour they will find a way of getting the money back. Perhaps a "green" tax on using too many bullets, just think of the carbon emissions!

I'm filling the car up tonight and stocking up on the Tescbury's 3 for 2 offers on wine as well.

On the subject of the "RAF typist" and the RSI injury, what really pi**es me off is not just the rediculous amount involved but the fact that it was, IIRC, a civil servant not a serving RAF member!! :mad:

I could be wrong but is the payment alluded to above not a pension in normal speak? If so, the mOD are trying to claim that L/Cpl Compton's pension is part of his compensation.

To:mad::mad:rs!

So it would be ok if it was a typist in uniform then R P? Or are civil servants the untermensch not worthy of walking in your shadow?;) Anyway it's comparing apples with pears talking about the relative values of military and civvy compo.

What pi**es me off is that the RAF could have saved the MOD £480K if they had done something about her working conditions in the first place. The size of the award reflected rules in the civilian workplace, the fact that the employer didn't act after being made aware of the problem and the fact that her condition is now permanent. Entirely avoidable!

I agree that the level of so-called compensation awards made to our badly injured troops is paltry. In fact compensation is probably the wrong word because that implies some balancing out of loss with gain. Hardly the case for L/Cpl Compton even if he was awarded lottery-size numbers.

Are you sure she was a civilian Riskman. I was told she was a serving SAC.

Riskman

Sorry. Poorly explained maybe. What pi:mad:es me off is the association that this compensation claim was paid to a serving member of the RAF. It wasn't it was paid to a civilian working for the RAF. No slight intended on civil serpants (unusually for me)

Mick not according to this press article:

She also claimed that she became depressed... well I am depressed by the stupid compensation culture and inordinate payouts like this, when service personnel are restricted by some arbitrary formula as to what they can receive. Often for far greater injury, disability and I would guess depression. Can I sue someone for compensation?

Roland, I think we're all on the same script. It just doesn't make for very good reading.:(

Never had you down as a Daily Mail reader Roody C'man. :p

And yet more outrages.....

http://timesonline.typepad.com/mick_...vil-serva.html

200K for a back injury. Just makes you wonder what all those ejection seat injuries are now worth!?!?!

Can't help thinking the civil servants are a convenient and easy target here.

It's the military system that sucks and needs correcting.

A nurse in the NHS has just been awarded £300k after developing an allergy to latex. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/n...re/7295132.stm

This is directly comparable to the 'RAF' typist and the other person (bad back from lifting a computer?). Civvy rules apply.