PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Why do all Aircrew tend suffer from Ducks Disease? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/308005-why-do-all-aircrew-tend-suffer-ducks-disease.html)

althenick 11th Jan 2008 02:12

Why do all Aircrew tend suffer from Ducks Disease?
 
Sorry to ask but are there Hieght restrictions in the military?

Look at the Link - I dont think any of them break 5' 7" is there a reason for this?

http://www.navynews.co.uk/view-story.aspx?articleID=87

kiwi chick 11th Jan 2008 02:33

Haven't bothered looking at the photo, but quite possibly because if they were much taller they'd smash their legs off at the knees whilst ejecting.

Which might hurt a bit. ;)

L J R 11th Jan 2008 04:08

Wow Kiwi Chick, you are so informed.

Background Noise 11th Jan 2008 05:46

I don't think they'll be ejecting from a Lynx.

airborne_artist 11th Jan 2008 06:13

It's a feature of the cost-cutting life that is now common throughout the Services. In order to get the new carriers Elizabeth and PoW through on a tight procurement budget, it has been necessary to reduce the headroom between decks to save on materials and weight. This means that Jack will have headroom 5'8" on all decks apart from the hangar.

The Dark Blue has therefore ceased recruiting anyone above that height, as it was further assessed that the costs of protective headgear for people over 5'8", and the possible costs of medical attention when cracking the bonce on the deckhead (ceiling to pongoes/cr@bs) would be too great.

Mach the Knife 11th Jan 2008 06:18

:) AA, a brilliant and well presented answer. Now if we can only get a similar policy towards the fat and unfit.... Just think of the savings.

geniculate 11th Jan 2008 06:38

Narrow doors and more stairs:}

VinRouge 11th Jan 2008 07:02

Angled deck old chap. bit of an optical illusion. Bit like when they angle mirrors up in clothes shops to make you look taller and thinner. But the opposite way.

Do agree though, it looks as from the pic as if the navy have been recruiting Hobbits!

brakedwell 11th Jan 2008 07:05

No need for more Hobbits!
 
MoD may delay carrier contract
By Sylvia Pfeifer and Chris Giles
Published: January 10 2008 22:02 | Last updated: January 10 2008 22:02
The Ministry of Defence is examining possible delays to its £4bn contract for two new aircraft carriers as it struggles to meet Treasury demands for swingeing cuts to its budget.

The MoD had been expected to agree a manufacturing contract with the industry alliance building the Royal Navy carriers as early as next week, but that now looks likely to slip.

BEagle 11th Jan 2008 07:23

It's because it's easier to fit them into the barrel.....

Ah-harrh, me hearties!

6Z3 11th Jan 2008 08:00

Any budding Douglas Baders are also very welcome.
.
BEagle, do you have a barrelbumbaccyhellosailorkissmehardy fixation?

LFFC 11th Jan 2008 08:16

Perhaps RN aircrew should be called "Ducks" from now on? :E

sitigeltfel 11th Jan 2008 08:23


Originally Posted by kiwi chick (Post 3828886)
Haven't bothered looking at the photo, but quite possibly because if they were much taller they'd smash their legs off at the knees whilst ejecting.

Which might hurt a bit. ;)

I remember being denied a back seat ride in a Martel equipped Buccaneer because of this. Had to sit in a dummy seat thingy to have my bum to kneecap measurement taken and was about 2" to long. I noticed a lot of the Navs on 12 Sqn were vertically challenged.

Confucius 11th Jan 2008 08:27


Now if we can only get a similar policy towards the fat and unfit.... Just think of the savings.
Or, close all the gyms, sack all the PEd staff, put useful buildings on sports fields - think of the savings.

XV277 11th Jan 2008 09:02

Bloke second from left looks a candidate for the RN basketball team

D-IFF_ident 11th Jan 2008 09:17

VR is right - it's the viewers perspective. They are all actually 7' 5".

Seriously though, look here: http://www.parliament.the-stationery.../63/63we06.htm

It's not really about height overall - no point having 5' legs, no body or neck and a 7" head for example. I understand that certain body parts, for entry into the Royal Navy, are expected to be less than 4 inches, whereas for entry into the RAF as a pilot an overall length of not less than 9 inches is required. :E

exrotarybooty 11th Jan 2008 10:00

D-IFF_ident

If I get your gist, does that apply to male and female entrants?

What happened to the old saying that size doesn't matter. :)

ERB

St Johns Wort 11th Jan 2008 10:02

Why do all Aircrew suffer from duck disease?
 
This has got nothing to do with ships, boats and things nautical. Its a factor introduced by the medical branch. As such it should be addressed to the quacks.

Union Jack 11th Jan 2008 10:02

D-IFF

"..... for entry into the RAF as a pilot an overall length of not less than 9 inches is required. :E"

including the ladies!?

Jack

BEagle 11th Jan 2008 10:16

Wasn't there an old Metropolitan Police recruiting advert which stated that the difference between a PC and a WPC was about 6 inches.....?

They meant height, but no-one else thought that!

And 6Z3, good grief no, me old mucker – I’ll leave that sort of thing to those of an alternative persuasion!

Far prefer people-formerly-known-as-WRNS in those crisp white shirts and black stockings*, meself!!









*and nothing else.....


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:28.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.