PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Were you on the Belfast? Any sign of scurvy? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/290174-were-you-belfast-any-sign-scurvy.html)

airsound 31st Aug 2007 09:04

Were you on the Belfast? Any sign of scurvy?
 
This thread springs, big and beautifully marked, out of the ‘A400M will not make 2009’ thread, which was creeping slowly and steadily, not unlike the magnificent Belfast itself. So, any fond (or otherwise) memories very welcome here

In the A400 thread, Barnstormer1968 said

Belfast's used to seem to be a nicer looking cousin (sort of) of the C133.
which reminded me of a conversation on approach into Chicago O’Hare. It went something like this
“Ascot 4321, Chicago, say aircraft type.”
“Ascot 4321 is a Belfast, Sir”
“What ‘n heck’s a Belfast, Ascot?”
“Oh.... it’s a big turboprop, bit like a Charlie 133, but prettier.”
“Ascot, Chicago, roger”
.......
“G’morning Chicago, United 678”
“United 678, Chicago, continue behind the landing Belfast”
“Behind the landing whaaat?”
microscopic pause while the controller ups his voice by a disbelieving semitone or two, then
“United 678, Chicago........ don’t you know a Belfast when you see one?”

airsound

galaxy flyer 2nd Sep 2007 23:50

Or the tow crew trying to put a Belfast into a C-130 hangar, thinking it was a C-130 and couldn't figure out why it wouldn't fit.

Or that the Belfast is the ONLY aircraft in which all the examples built flew together in ONE formation. Try that in your Phantom!!

GF

There has to be some RAF or HeavyLift guys with Belfast stories........

Blacksheep 3rd Sep 2007 00:56

I have lots of stories, but the Belfast was one of those aircraft I prefer to forget. It was rumoured around Brize Line Servicing Squadron (mostly among the VC10 specialists) that the Belfast was built in two halfs that were joined up mid-production. The front half was built by Catholics and the rear half was built by Protestants and the clever trick was to get both parts working together at the same time.

An example: Two main batteries connected in parallel. A spare provided just in case. The mains are changed once every three months. The spare, not being charged in situ, is changed monthly. To change the spare you have to remove both the mains for access... :ugh:

woodring 3rd Sep 2007 06:14

The gentlemans way to fly, night stop everywhere.
and a few hours kip in one of the 6 bunks en-route.
Four days to Hong Kong, then go u/s and cancel the circuit bashing that had been planned. 5 days back including a visit to the wine festival in Limasoll.
Those certainly where the days.

Blacksheep 3rd Sep 2007 07:56


Four days to Hong Kong, then go u/s
Since when did a Belfast make it all the way to Honkers without going u/s along the way? :rolleyes:

364 held the record. Eastabout via Oz arriving back in UK with none of the original engines - six engine changes en-route. (The one in Gan must have been genuine.) I was on that Gan team and it took us four days to adjust full power. The Rolls Royce graphs went down to -30° C but only went up to +25° C so we had to interpolate them and then do the engine adjustments at 2 am when the temperature dropped to about 28° C. :ugh:

Out here in Borneo we recently chartered the last airworthy (?) Belfast to transport an engine. It promptly went u/s en-route from Brisbane and diverted to Denpasar for a week to have one of its own engines replaced. In the meantime we got a good old reliable Antonov in to do the job.

Agaricus bisporus 3rd Sep 2007 12:16

Then they fell into the hand of civvies...

It is alleged (on good authority, I assure you) that a young fellow was being interviewed for a job as FO somewhere in Essex. The interview consisted of just one question..."How many cans of Boddington's fit into a standard flight bag?"

He got the job.

(It wasn't me) My interview consisted of "May I see your logbook?" followed by "Can you start Monday?".

They clearly inspired a special spirit amongst their crews!

woodring 3rd Sep 2007 15:56

They could be reliable ,we spent a month with 2 a/c in Bahrein shuttlling to Aden before the withdrawal and I don't remember any major snags .

pontifex 3rd Sep 2007 19:30

My abiding memory of the Belslow was when on detachment to Masirah watching one backing up to the very edge of the runway before take off directed by the loadmaster from the ramp.

Beeayeate 3rd Sep 2007 22:55

Only worked Belfasts as and when they passed through Gan, and then generally at night for some reason. Thing I remember most about the Belf was that it took in the order of 3,000 pumps on the hyd hand pump to close the ramp door. And the hyd hand pump was not very securely mounted nor thoughtfully positioned.

http://www.canberra.plus.com/pics/ganbelfast.jpg

Taken from my billet window in '72(ish).


:ok:

Krakatoa 4th Sep 2007 10:47

The last one is still gainfully employed doing charters around the region. It can be seen parked in the GA area close to the road into Cairns.

Mark M'Words 4th Sep 2007 16:15

Don't remember Boddingtons being a favourite..... 'twas always a slab of green(heiniken) a slab of red(mckewans export) and bottles of scotch.

Always remember my first night stop, all of the crew in the Captains room for drinks when the top of the whisky bottle was unscrewed very ceremoniously by the loadie and then chucked out of the window.......because we wouldn't be needing it again!!

Heavylift a strangly ran flying club but it was fun....sometimes:}

twentygrand 4th Sep 2007 17:32

Changi & back
 
I was the co-pilot on both double crew runs to Changi and back in mid '68. We made the return journey in 3 days via Akrotiri, Muharraq, and Gan. The first time we swopped places 90 mins before landing but the simpler option of leg & leg about worked better. The crews felt OK at the end but the medics in their "sound proof" capsule down the back were knackered.:

The Belfast really need a fifth engine and it was pretty marginal in the heat - everyone came out at Changi to watch the takeoff and to see if we would clear the palm trees at the end.

It was also spirally unstable - you needed out-turn aileron in an established turn, and of course it wouldn't stall properly.

galaxy flyer 5th Sep 2007 02:34

It seems the Belfast rivals the C-5 in reliability (?) Twice I spent more than a week in Honolulu getting fixed. One major gear problem and once replacing a elevator actuator. C-5, great airplane to really see the world.

Anyway, I did see the Belf in Cairns recently. Love to have flown on it.

GF

Al R 5th Sep 2007 06:49

Interesting thread, thank you.

Heavy Lift is restoring a second Belfast with a view to it joining their other one. The work is being done at Sarfend Airport.

http://heavyliftcargo.com/belfastcap.htm

This might be one for the old lags. Is there any truth in the rumour that our original order of Belfast was slashed because we devalued Sterling and when we had to go to the American World Bank or IMF for help, we were politely asked if we had ever considered buying more of their smaller but more flexible Hercules'..?

Gainesy 5th Sep 2007 07:05


Twice I spent more than a week in Honolulu getting fixed.
Good Drills.:ok::)

tornadoken 5th Sep 2007 19:34

AI R: (Belfast:IMF): No.
1959 procurement, driven by perceived need to lift Blue Streak. No more than 10 needed. Retained after demise of IRBM as make-work for Short's and value for Bristol (wings) in merger into BAC. RAF's 1964 wish for C-130H was to dump Argosy, ordered in 1959 when RAF had wanted C-130E. Need for IMF Loan was 1965.

galaxy flyer 6th Sep 2007 01:00

Number of posts on engine problems-was the Tyne just too far ahead of its time or was their a particular issue? Was used rather well on the Dassault Atlantique, I believe. Second, compared to the Belfast, is the A400M bigger or smaller? Last, did the Belfast have boosted controls or tabs? And what was it like to manhandle.

I know it will bring tactical capability. We had all kinds of airdrop facilities in C-5 but never used except for ICBMs and training. Yes, ICBMs!

GF

Samuel 6th Sep 2007 01:45

Didn't the Belfast have a Britannia wing?
Was the Tyne used on anything else other than the Belfast/Vanguard?; [the Lockheed Electra was a much better aircraft by the way, and in Orion form is still around!]

Al R 6th Sep 2007 06:52

tornadoken said;

No. 1959 procurement, driven by perceived need to lift Blue Streak. No more than 10 needed. Retained after demise of IRBM as make-work for Short's and value for Bristol (wings) in merger into BAC. RAF's 1964 wish for C-130H was to dump Argosy, ordered in 1959 when RAF had wanted C-130E. Need for IMF Loan was 1965.
Cheers.

RETDPI 6th Sep 2007 08:06

From memory ( no documents to hand) I seem to recall that the original intention to order 10 Belfasts was considered a nonsense at Shorts who would only proceed on a minimum of 30 or so. This was duly agreed . Once the production line was committed then the order was then once more cut back to 10.
Originally called the Britannic ( Brit wing ) then Belfast once the aircraft had grown with the 20ft centre-section implant.
Hispano licence built Tynes went into Transall and Atlantique amongst others.
Only flew in one once ( "Hercules") coming home from Gernany post 1969 King Rock ( Beags!) - slept through the landing. Flight deck like the bridge of the Queen Mary.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:00.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.