PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Channel 4 Now. Dispatches in Afghanistan (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/259049-channel-4-now-dispatches-afghanistan.html)

mbga9pgf 8th Jan 2007 19:32

Channel 4 Now. Dispatches in Afghanistan
 
Worth A watch

AonP 8th Jan 2007 19:34

Dispatches
 
Agreed, very good so far, has highlighted a number of shortcomings especially regarding aviation assets!

Web link:

http://www.channel4.com/news/dispatc...cle.jsp?id=986

mbga9pgf 8th Jan 2007 19:36


Originally Posted by AonP (Post 3057789)
Agreed, very good so far, has highlighted a number of shortcomings especially regarding aviation assets!

Certainly puts the Army's moans in perspective. No wonder the MOD dont want this shown!

Continues Thursday, 23:00 from the Flip-Flops perspective. Again, could be well worth a watch.

Tonkenna 8th Jan 2007 20:06

Very interesting, and only increases my respect for those guys...

Tonks

JAG3 8th Jan 2007 20:13

It was a chilling but different aspect of reporting and showed a side of the armed forces that I haven't seen before. Interesting to hear the sound of the A-10 and also the reporter mentioning a presence of the B1.

airborne_artist 8th Jan 2007 20:15

And after five/six days of wall to wall combat, no sleep, not enough food, lack of casevac once (or more) and running short on food and meds. they have to leave the position to be re-occupied by the Taleban :ugh:

DEL Mode 8th Jan 2007 20:16

ISAF
 
and what exactly are we stabilising?

Melchett01 8th Jan 2007 21:05


and what exactly are we stabilising?
The house just behind the mosque. Then the house over the road. Then the compound on the outskirts of town before moving on to secure the treeline in the distance.

And that isn't me being flippant. This is back to WW2 advancing through Normandy, clearing areas house by house and field by field. Only then, we didn't pull back after 6 days of fighting and hand it straight back to the enemy. That only happens when politicians get too involved in the fighting.

I certainly hope that people, politicians especially realise what is actually going on out on the ground, and that whoever decided to go to war with only 8 CH-47s is thoroughly ashamed of themselves - I thought they learnt how to plann effectively at Shriv?!

Razor61 8th Jan 2007 21:07

The Government can now see the morale of our troops, and their faces when they were told they were leaving the town after six days of intense fighting because re-inforcements were coming, then being told they were not....so basically for nothing...

It was interesting to see the different regiments all working together in such a small unit. AAC actually taking the charge, with Blues And Royals, Light Infantry, Royal Irish Regiment, Scots.... etc....and the Estonians with us...

wg13_dummy 8th Jan 2007 21:45

This is what our lads get;

http://www.warshipsifr.com/media/rm_wmik.jpg





And this is what the 'third world counrty' of Estonia provide for their chaps;

http://mamba.armour.co.za/images/mamba2.jpg



The Mambas were actually Brit vehicles that we flogged to them at a fraction of the cost.

Here's a bit more on it.

Our caring, sharing MoD

AC Ovee 8th Jan 2007 21:46

Hang on, guys, the fall back might not have been a British decision. I understood the scenario to be that the ANA and ANP were the primary fighting elements of the push against the Taleban in that area, with light UK/Estonian rear support (hence the mishmash of a few UK resources and permision for a TV crew to go along). It was a decision by the ANA/ANP to not send re-inforcements to maintain the security of the village, and we don't know why they changed their minds. There was a report of a bigger batttle elswhere in Helmand. Yes, disappointing for those involved, but we didn't see the bigger picture.

wg13_dummy 8th Jan 2007 21:50


Originally Posted by AC Ovee (Post 3057996)
Hang on, guys, the fall back might not have been a British decision. I understood the scenario to be that the ANA and ANP were the primary fighting elements of the push against the Taleban in that area, with light UK/Estonian rear support (hence the mishmash of a few UK resources and permision for a TV crew to go along). It was a decision by the ANA/ANP to not send re-inforcements to maintain the security of the village, and we don't know why they changed their minds. There was a report of a bigger batttle elswhere in Helmand. Yes, disappointing for those involved, but we didn't see the bigger picture.


The bigger picture should be we either commit 100% or not at all.

It's either a peace keeping/enforcing op where we assist and support a fledgling regime or we do the war fighting bit first then follow up with the tree hugging bit. At present, we are half heartidly commited to a war run and lead by a bunch of gun toting ragheads. British servicemen should never be put in a situation where they cannot at least command and control their own destiny.

Talking Radalt 9th Jan 2007 01:04


Originally Posted by wg13_dummy (Post 3057992)
This is what our lads get;

Not entirely true. The WMIKs now have retro fitted "soft" armour....that stuff that looks like tri-wall boxes folded flat and hung all over the vehicle.
Still no Mamba though, but then, Mamba > Chinook cabin.

Secret Squire 9th Jan 2007 01:31

Does anyone know if it is possible to view this online, a la panorama thing on afghan a few weeks back, for those of us that are students on the verge of turning pongo officer (fair few of us in this flat), and who don't have a tv?

Cheers

SS

airborne_artist 9th Jan 2007 06:27

SS- I think it's available as a download at http://www.channel4.com/4od/

the reason they are all from different regts is that the UK team was cobbled together at the last minute - the Irish officer was at a desk in Kandahar planning trg for Afghan troops, for example. They scooped up people who were vaguely free, for what was supposed to be a 2 day job. Officially they were a "Operational Mentoring & Liaison Team (OMLT)"!

Article in the Mail that describes the action is here.

"....three officers were given 24 hours to scrape together what men and equipment they could, and ordered to lead around 200 Afghan National Army (ANA) and police on a desperate 100-mile dash across Taliban-held desert in open top Land Rovers and trucks, groaning with all the ammunition they could carry."

threepointonefour 9th Jan 2007 06:35


Originally Posted by Melchett01 (Post 3057904)
This is back to WW2 advancing through Normandy, clearing areas house by house and field by field. Only then, we didn't pull back after 6 days of fighting and hand it straight back to the enemy.


The scary thing is that this is exactly what happened in WW1.

London Mil 9th Jan 2007 06:48

Well I thought it was a smashing advertisment for the professionalism of the British squaddy. Cobbled together with a couple of bits of string and a tin of beans they got on with the job in hand. The most telling bit however was the last clip of the cpl medic who was lost for words at the incredulity of the fact they were now having to withdraw.
There was also the bit where the captain was on the blower about "critical this and critical that" and you could just imagine the chiseler in Bde HQ on the other end giving it "yeah, yeah, whatever".

ISAF - good to see they still cannot organize the proverbial wine tasting in a vinyard.

spectre150 9th Jan 2007 09:26

And this is what the 'third world counrty' of Estonia provide for their chaps;

Going off thread and irrelevant in the contex of the important issues raised in the TV programme and this thread but I just cant stop myself reacting. Fellow NATO and EU member Estonia third world? I think not.

Excellent programme - liked the way that the TV crew let the drama of the situation speak for itself and didnt try and sex it up.

wg13_dummy 9th Jan 2007 09:44


Originally Posted by spectre150 (Post 3058632)
And this is what the 'third world counrty' of Estonia provide for their chaps;
Going off thread and irrelevant in the contex of the important issues raised in the TV programme and this thread but I just cant stop myself reacting. Fellow NATO and EU member Estonia third world? I think not.
Excellent programme - liked the way that the TV crew let the drama of the situation speak for itself and didnt try and sex it up.


It was said very much tongue in cheek. Almost relating to thier Eurovision Song Contest recognition. Point I was making was they have better kit than us (but so does The Ivory Coast, Iceland and Kazakhstan; jagshemash :hmm: )

Had Enough 77 9th Jan 2007 11:23

Excellent programme, it was very well presented and you could see that the army chaps on the ground respected the reporter. I think the most salient point was when the reporter after speaking to the irish rangers(I think) captain, he learned of the fate of the village. He then told one of the soldiers, i think he was the medic, the look on his face firstly thought he was joking, after he realised he wasn't joking it turned to one of disgust.

It must be absolutely soul destroying out there to fight long and hard only to walk away and let the enemy waltz back in. I did think that it showed our soldiers to have a huge amount of proffesionalism and integrity, especially when dealing with the injured taliban prisoner.

It will lead to some embarressed faces in the MOD but i think that is about all that will happen. It just highlights the complete lack of resources out there for the actual WAR that is being fought, while at home we are ready for the next round of cuts to reduce our Armed forces to some kind of self defence force.:mad:


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:29.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.