Originally Posted by Blacksheep
Thirty-odd years ago UK withdrew from East of Suez precisely because we could no longer afford to run an imaginary Empire. Meanwhile, the French withdrew even from Algeria. The idea was to cut back our armed forces to operate only in Europe and around our own shores.
Doing the same today, however, would be a little dull and ultimately pointless.
Originally Posted by Blacksheep
Just wondering out loud why either the UK or the French need an aircraft carrier. Carriers are for global force projection.
My point is that a defensive posture is not what is required these days. What is required is the ability to send our forces to where they may be needed - hence the reason to buy 2 CVFs, A400M, Tomahawks, C17, lighter armoured vehicles, new amphibious shipping, increase the size of our SF etc etc. This has been the way of things for quite a while now my dear chap - I do hope this enlightens you! :ugh: |
Sense1 - fully concur.
B'sheep - you're absolutely correct that we cut the Empire coz it was just too expensive a proposition in every sense. We're not expanding it anymore, merely ensuring we have the tools of the trade to influence events if the government of the day judge it necessary (so are the French). The stated aim of the HM's Armed Forces is to be able to deploy and support wherever military capability is needed across the globe in support of national policy. Not quite the same as deciding to take over India again. (And - since we've always stated we're getting out of Iraq at the earliest opportunity, let's not branch off into that debate!). SB |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.