Can I start a new thread without the usual suspects spouting b******s
 

?

Depends on the topic, but I doubt it...

I'd like to see that!

If you think it's bad here, well, try some of the boards where they have a rank system for contributors, and promotion is earned on the sole criterion of the number of posts. :rolleyes:

adr

Go on then, I need a good chuckle

AP, you're asking for it.

They're all talking B******t, of course...

I really must stop posting after visiting my local hostelry....

...and who are your "usual suspects"?;) ;) ;)

...tell me about your childhood...:hmm: :hmm: :hmm:

Well, is the J better than the Merlin?:rolleyes:

AP

We'll have to wait for there to be plenty of flying 'Quite near an Aerodrome Somewhere in England' for that to ever happen ------

And if you included a little about a rotary cat I'm sure the thread could start to SSizzle!!


Now where's the damn butler when you need him!!

:E :E

Opinion this, opinion that! Average P you get my vote!

I thought this was a rumour network not a gossip column or a place for bald aviators and hydraulic failures to attempt to convince that they have had a personal acquaintance with anything and everything that ever happened in the RAF or the RN. Thank God crossbow has gone to ground!

fw

Agree old chap. Long live rumour, gossip and opinion - but it ain't arf becoming increasingly tedious in the hands of the 'been there, done that, seen it' brigade. Actually, it's not a brigade, more like a small platoon.

AP, please tell us your proposed subject is not an "IFSD" story :(

;)

AP,

You cracked it! Well done, old boy!! I have just resurrected this from Page 2; it's the 1st of March; the last post on your thread was on 27th of February and still no bollox from the "usual suspects"!!

You did it, man!!

Small prize for copies of B*****s log book

Gosh what a truly interesting thread this is......:rolleyes:

Bugga! One of them has popped up and (given that it is not an interesting thread) is, as usual, talking bollox!

Splash, I've been told that my origional reply to your post was too short so I've made it a bit longer. The origional reply was:





:ok: