PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Latest Rumours ... (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/123785-latest-rumours.html)

foxxhunter 22nd Mar 2004 17:08

Latest Rumours ...
 
So far I've heard these ...

1. Reduction in personnel from current levels to somewhere between 33-38,000

2. Redundancies on offer for aircrew aged 30-38, circa £175k !

3. Falklands - no aircraft

4. 100 Sqn to close, or get Jags. Don't know which is worse!

5. Leeming and Colt to close.

6. Typhoon rumours various - all short of cancellation though.

Anyone got any more? Or can you shed any light on the ones above?

:mad:

MrBernoulli 22nd Mar 2004 18:58

"3. Falklands - no aircraft"

I somehow doubt it. Every time they have threatened or even hinted about withdrawing the VC10 tanker out of MPA, someone with a very important finger in the pie squashes it (the idea, not the pie). Somebody in the whole Falkland setup carries a lot of weight at ministerial level and manages to punch at a weight well above that which the Falklands' deserve!

So all the aircraft withdrawn? No chance!

Archimedes 22nd Mar 2004 20:18

I wonder why 100 Sqn would receive Jags when the other favourite rumour is for the entire Jag fleet to be binned? I'd have thought that contractorisation and use of a few of ze very jolie Alpha Jet (peut-etre) to fill the role would have been more likely- unless Jacko's comments about the platform have been taken on board and the Jag fleet is to expand ;)

Agree with Mr B that removing aircraft from Falklands is likely to be a non-starter.

Have heard again the interesting (and probably false) rumour about Typhoon - that we will get all 232, since we wrote the contract so tightly (to keep the Germans in) that we can't get out, and will instead sell some of the fleet to the Austrians, Greeks and possibly Saudis/Kuwaitis/Omanis (take your pick...) to recoup most of the cash shelled out for them.

jack_k 22nd Mar 2004 20:30

Cuts and stuff
 
Hm
The problem with trying to sell some of our 232 is that BAe want to sell 232 to the RAF and lots of others to other nations.
If BAe do have a tightly drawn up contract then there may not be any chance of ditching the Typhoon numbers and the plan, according to them, will go as:
RAF buys 232
Austria orders and gets some of the airframes allocated to us
Tranche 2 and 3 are delayed to ensure that export customers get priority.
Possibly :confused:

Jackonicko 22nd Mar 2004 23:08

For a 137 frontline aircraft, seven squadron Typhoon fleet, plus in use reserves, to last the 25 years they are supposed to, you apparently need 232 aircraft. If we go down to six squadrons you could cut the total by 30 jets, or so (smaller training requirement etc.) but to trim many more, you'd be looking at a substantially smaller force or a shorter life. And our boxheaded chums definitely want all 180 of theirs, and may even exercise an option for a few more, so if we cut back, the penalties and workshare implications won't be nice.

Mad_Mark 23rd Mar 2004 06:42

MrBornugly,

Somebody in the whole Falkland setup carries a lot of weight at ministerial level and manages to punch at a weight well above that which the Falklands' deserve!
So, you think that a part of Britain that has been invaded within the past 25 years by a neighbour, and is still claimed by that neighbour as being their territory, does not DESERVE a couple of F3's and other support aircraft to protect it from any possible future threat? Right, best we move the whole RAF fleet to your nearest airfield so we can protect just you, as obviously no other Brittish citizen DESERVES our protection :mad:

I think those in the Falkland Islands are at more of a direct threat of military attack by a neighbour (however slim that threat may be right now, it still exists) than those of us at home back in dear old Blighty, and deserve our whole-hearted support.

MadMark!!! :mad:

timex 23rd Mar 2004 07:16


Somebody in the whole Falkland setup carries a lot of weight at ministerial level and manages to punch at a weight well above that which the Falklands' deserve!

Earth calling!! Fought for it once, don't want to repeat that one. Lets face it if you were going to try and grab the FI back, now would be a good time. HMF overstretch, World problems and IS probs at home..

Colonel W E Kurtz 23rd Mar 2004 11:52

This goverment does not give a **** about 2000 farmers on a heap of rocks. All they care about are the massive oil reserves down there.

Why don't you wake up and smell the coffee. The only reason we invaded iraq was because of the oil down there as well.
:mad:

I_stood_in_the_door 23rd Mar 2004 12:07

Col Kurtz,

Wheres the oil in Kosovo, gimp boy?

Surely we defended Iraq and the Falklands for a noble cause?

isitd

:}

nimrodcatcher 23rd Mar 2004 14:02

I've heard RAF to acquire Apache....and the pongos to get all the Rapier kit.

Eight Eights Blue 23rd Mar 2004 18:40

There is always one out there waiting for a bite and I am in just the mood.
RAF to acquire Apache - Me thinks not old boy.
The only way you will have Apache is if we all combine to make the Royal Sky Corps. Then and only then will the old RAF get their mits on it.
Then again before me jumps into the fire anything can happen nowadays.

Hueymeister 23rd Mar 2004 21:36

Dear Mr Para I stood in the door...my colonial cousin says there is oil in Kosovo..a huge pipeline..very important he says..and surprise, surprise if the largest camp Uncle Sam has is sat right on top of it!!!!!

Hopefully Col Kurtz isn't feeling too bruised!

TTFN

ZH875 23rd Mar 2004 21:55

RAF to get the Apache....


...If this is to be the case, how on earth do their Airships arrange to get a 5 star hotel near every Helipad in the battle area.

Think of the cost of training RAF Chopper Pilots to dig holes, fill sandbags and unroll sleeping bags.

Nope, it will never happen.

More chance of the Typhoon being in service on time.:p

I_stood_in_the_door 24th Mar 2004 03:19

Huey,

One nil to you. However only goat herders and dead serbs on my last visit.

Heres a spoon to eat my ass.

isitd

:mad:

pig fist 24th Mar 2004 13:48

Eurothingy
 
Rumour in the HAS'es is that the Eurothingy moneypit (aka Typhoon) is having a few snags getting into service. Result more cash for F3's - more support for FI det. Having seen some of the flying they do down there (out of the prying eyes of UK NATS and co) why would they want to give up their 4 week jolly?
Anyone got a firm answer for the ISD for Typhooooooooon?

polomint 24th Mar 2004 18:57

100SQN ,COLT ETC
 
heard that when colt closes the jags are moving to 100 sqn and as for the typhoon they have done quite a few sorties recently.

JagMate 28th Mar 2004 13:02

Please someone tell me about the £175K package to retire pre 38. Where do I sign.

10forcash 29th Mar 2004 16:13

isitd,
The colonials in Kosovo do indeed have a very long lease on several bits of land, not oil though, there are lots of industrial minerals in the balkans many of which are pretty close to the surface (as the EOD teams found out on the dems. ranges)
Cheers,
10forcash

moggie 1st Apr 2004 18:28

I've heard the Jags for Leeming story from a couple of sources of late - but no details as to who gets them (100Sqn or their present keepers relocating).

Last runour I heard on Leeming was closure 2009 when F3 finally bites the dust.

HectorusRex 2nd Apr 2004 05:17

From Daily Telegraph, Friday 2nd April

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...ixnewstop.html

Five RAF bases to close in £1bn cuts
By Michael Smith, Defence Correspondent
(Filed: 02/04/2004)


The Ministry of Defence is planning the biggest cuts in Armed Forces' equipment for decades as part of attempts to save more than £1 billion from the defence budget.

Five RAF bases are to go, with the scrapping of all the RAF's 62 ground-attack Jaguars, all its 79 ground-attack GR7 Harriers and all its 39 Puma helicopters.

The Royal Navy will lose the two carriers Illustrious and Invincible, at least two frigates and its 88 Sea King helicopters, and close four naval storage bases.

The Army will have to close a number of camps on the Salisbury Plain training area and axe at least 50 Challenger 2 tanks, 50 Warrior armoured personnel carriers and all 118 of its Gazelle helicopters.

The cuts are so wide-reaching that ministers are planning to hold back the announcement of some until after a general election.

At least three Scottish infantry battalions are in danger of being amalgamated, a move that could spark a widespread defection of Labour voters north of the border to the Nationalists.

But the Government believes the suggestion by Oliver Letwin, shadow chancellor, that the Conservatives would cut the defence budget, now denied by the Tories, makes it impossible for them to challenge any cuts.

The Royal Scots and the Black Watch, two of the most famous Scottish regiments but both with recruiting problems, are most likely to go.

The overall cuts will lead to 2,000 officers being made redundant across all three services as well as a number of senior NCOs. The large-scale disposals come after the Treasury won its battle with the MoD over cash shortages caused by the adoption of a new accounting system, the cost of expensive new programmes and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Under the new Resource Account Budgeting system it costs government departments more money to keep open large numbers of bases.

Working groups within the MoD were told to find ways to save money from current equipment to protect projects such as the Navy's two new carriers and the RAF's Eurofighter/Typhoon aircraft.

The RAF bases to close include Coltishall in Norfolk, which houses all the RAF's Jaguar ground-attack aircraft, Wittering in Cambridgeshire, home of Joint Force Harrier, and Benson in Oxfordshire.

Military commanders are furious at the long list.

Nicholas Soames, shadow defence secretary, accused the Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, of planning "to wreak havoc on the Forces".

1 April 2004: Navy to 'lose two carriers' in cutbacks
31 March 2004: Cost of Iraq war leaves Forces facing cuts
28 March 2004: Ships in danger say Navy chiefs, as Sea Harriers are scrapped
6 January 2004: Warships are first casualty as spending cuts hit Navy


Previous story: Blunkett on the rack as minister quits over immigration 'cover-up'
Next story: Blair go-ahead for compulsory ID cards to beat terrorism

Related reports

Forces get ready to fight cutbacks


External links

Ministry of Defence

Royal Navy

HM Treasury

Black day for the Royal Navy [31 Mar '04] - Conservative Party


:mad:


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:34.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.