Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

D-Day 80 Year Anniversary

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

D-Day 80 Year Anniversary

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2024, 01:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,857
Received 81 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Krystal n chips
I'd hazard a guess here and say...the French perhaps ?

This on the basis there aren't any local objectors around this time who may not have been in favour of the wx data being collected.
Are the French even expecting us? Apparently the reason that the Union Flag has been left off some bunting in France is, according to a French Lady, because of Brexit. Because we'd left the EU we were out of site, out of mind. That said, were the American and Canadian flags on the bunting I wonder? Even more interesting, German and Austrian flags?

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 06:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,628
Received 395 Likes on 237 Posts
"so if they ever needed to do a substantial airborne drop in the future war scenario,"

I thought the days of a mass airdrop in a war died (with a lot of brave men) at Arnhem and Dien Bien Phu - 70 years ago.

Airborne forces almost always use a helicopter these days
Asturias56 is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st May 2024, 09:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hong Kong SAR
Age: 80
Posts: 323
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Easy Street
I have always thought that the Levene reforms were a missed opportunity to find out exactly how much the Army really believes it needs an airborne capability by making it directly liable for the associated cost of maintaining an airlift fleet of the requisite size. I am sure that it would quickly come to the conclusion that it had better things to spend the money on.
Like hundreds of horses and cavalry, based in London for ceremonial purposes.
More horses than tanks...
CISTRS is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by CISTRS:
Old 21st May 2024, 16:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,628
Received 395 Likes on 237 Posts
Originally Posted by CISTRS
Like hundreds of horses and cavalry, based in London for ceremonial purposes.
More horses than tanks...
Brings in a lot of tourist $$$$$$$$$ - and quite cheap compared to buying aircraft
Asturias56 is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st May 2024, 17:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,094
Received 193 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
"so if they ever needed to do a substantial airborne drop in the future war scenario,"

I thought the days of a mass airdrop in a war died (with a lot of brave men) at Arnhem and Dien Bien Phu - 70 years ago.

Airborne forces almost always use a helicopter these days
Apart from Operation Trent (and several drops during Corporate) - its a capability thats probably best not just gaffed off because it hasn't been used in a while. When was the last time the AD Force shot down an aerial intruder? When did the silent service last loose off a nuke?
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 17:38
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 536
Received 179 Likes on 95 Posts
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
Apart from Operation Trent (and several drops during Corporate) - its a capability thats probably best not just gaffed off because it hasn't been used in a while. When was the last time the AD Force shot down an aerial intruder? When did the silent service last loose off a nuke?
Not entirely sure you can categorise the Corporate and Trent ops as "mass air-drops". Parachute-insertion, yes, mass, no.
Not_a_boffin is online now  
Old 21st May 2024, 17:43
  #27 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,167
Received 234 Likes on 72 Posts
I may be wrong, but I believe the last mass drop (36 x C-130) was Exercise Bold Guard way back in September '74. I left the fleet at the end of '75, and the RAF at the end of '76, so I'm open to correction.
Herod is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 18:17
  #28 (permalink)  
ICM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bishops Stortford, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 472
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Herod: I suspect you may be correct, as that was back in the UKJATFOR era, and I doubt there has been a proper 'mass drop' since that concept wound up. (I'd add that it cleaned out all other Hercules tasking for a number of days around the exercise.)
ICM is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 20:54
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 60
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lordflasheart
...
They could always ask the Russian delegation (yes really ! ) -
and


- to bring a couple of extra IL-76s to the party.

LFH
Putin always has an answer!. A very trustworthy man……………..
tarantonight is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 20:59
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,307
Received 764 Likes on 262 Posts
Originally Posted by ICM
Herod: I suspect you may be correct, as that was back in the UKJATFOR era, and I doubt there has been a proper 'mass drop' since that concept wound up. (I'd add that it cleaned out all other Hercules tasking for a number of days around the exercise.)
ISTR a reasonably big one Arnhem plus 50, in 1994. It included some game old veterans. I hope I am correct because the few grey cells remaining say that I supervised the DZ forecast, racked with nerves.

Happy to be corrected.
langleybaston is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 21:25
  #31 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,167
Received 234 Likes on 72 Posts
ICM: Yes indeed, and of course Bold Guard was a tragedy. For those who don't know, it's on Wiki. I was on one of the last aircraft; 35 or 36, and the whole DZ was a blaze if red flares and lights. From my RHS, as we flew over I could see the freighter that shouldn't have been there. We naturally didn't drop, but diverted.
Herod is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 21:52
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bozeat
Posts: 19
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He should be held to task on this.Noone asks the Question.
javelinfaw9 is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 22:03
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bozeat
Posts: 19
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Total BS AGAIN. Cost cutting exercise got shot of Herks. Now trying to make out its all a plan to not have enough airlift in place.
How this twice bankrupt chancer is a Minister of State astounds me. And he keeps getting jobs.?????,
javelinfaw9 is offline  
Old 21st May 2024, 22:42
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 380
Received 174 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
Are the French even expecting us?

FB
I must be missing the point. I thought that surprise was one of the defining characteristics of Airborne Insertion.
DuncanDoenitz is offline  
Old 22nd May 2024, 08:36
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,628
Received 395 Likes on 237 Posts
" its a capability thats probably best not just gaffed off because it hasn't been used in a while"

that why the RN keeps HMS Victory I guess and the USN "Constitution" - but you can't just keep capability forever if its never used. No-one uses large scale paratroop drops any more and hasn't for at least 40 years - more like 65 in the west. Battleships have gone, cavalry has gone, torpedo bombers have gone...........
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 22nd May 2024, 13:48
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,331
Received 137 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
ISTR a reasonably big one Arnhem plus 50, in 1994. It included some game old veterans. I hope I am correct because the few grey cells remaining say that I supervised the DZ forecast, racked with nerves.

Happy to be corrected.
I think the wind was outside limits for the vets in 1994, and there were a number of injuries to the younger generation of paras. There was a 1500 parachutist drop for the 75th anniversary of Operation Market in 2019.

I recollect seeing Starlifters for a mass drop going overhead, I am pretty sure this was the Arnhem 50th as six C-141s were used to drop UK and US paratroops. Which is a round about way of saying could not HMG have asked the US nicely to help out again with the planned June 6th drop?
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 22nd May 2024, 14:17
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,094
Received 193 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
" its a capability thats probably best not just gaffed off because it hasn't been used in a while"

that why the RN keeps HMS Victory I guess and the USN "Constitution" - but you can't just keep capability forever if its never used. No-one uses large scale paratroop drops any more and hasn't for at least 40 years - more like 65 in the west. Battleships have gone, cavalry has gone, torpedo bombers have gone...........
Is the decision on capability being made on equipment? or the decision on equipment being made on capability, and that's my point.

It seems to me the decision on capability is being made on the decision to withdraw the C130, whilst replacing it with eurotrash which is some way from providing the same flexibility.

We could get rid of all armour - lets face it, the last armour engagement was 1991 and that wasn't exactly 'the Fulda Gap'.
Our ASW haven't sunk a submarine since WWII - they can go.
AD fleet haven't shot down an aggressor since 1945 - in the bin you go.
Apache's were actually bought to kill tanks - they haven't done that - useful, but off they go.
Subs have never fired a nuke, and last sunk a ship in 1982 - gone.
When was the last time regiments went over the top accompanied by pipe and drum - gone
Red arrows? Minesweepers?

So, we have an Air Force of a few heli's, transport and some bombers, with a bit of ISTAR, a Navy of carriers and a few escorts, some infantry and SF. Job done.



minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 22nd May 2024, 15:15
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Form follows function

"… the decision on capability"

'Form follows function'; but form is limited by budget, which is limited by politics, limited by public perception - shaped by governments.
safetypee is online now  
Old 22nd May 2024, 16:05
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,628
Received 395 Likes on 237 Posts
"So, we have an Air Force of a few heli's, transport and some bombers, with a bit of ISTAR, a Navy of carriers and a few escorts, some infantry and SF. Job done."

We're not a million miles away from that now unfortunately - but as safetypee says there is budget (far too low IMHO) and you start by cutting the things you're least likely to need. Parachuting large numbers of troops is clearly one.
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 22nd May 2024, 16:11
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 350/3 Compton
Age: 76
Posts: 803
Received 441 Likes on 103 Posts
Our ASW haven't sunk a submarine since WWII - they can go

Not quite true actually. You forgot the Santa Fe which was crippled by the combination of a Wessex 3 with depth charges and a Wasp with AS12. It ran ashore in Grytviken and was later scuttled.

Mog
Mogwi is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.