Chinese spy balloon over US
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHAT IF
China want to know if USA has a [email protected] weapon capable of shooting down satellites etc. Also more generally wish to portray USA as the hostile one.
Brainstorming meeting comes up with an annoying flotilla of 'peacefully lost' weather balloons just out of reach of standard air defence weapons and loaded with sensors to track any response/action
China want to know if USA has a [email protected] weapon capable of shooting down satellites etc. Also more generally wish to portray USA as the hostile one.
Brainstorming meeting comes up with an annoying flotilla of 'peacefully lost' weather balloons just out of reach of standard air defence weapons and loaded with sensors to track any response/action
Originally Posted by Jetstream67
WHAT IF
Brainstorming meeting comes up with an annoying flotilla of 'peacefully lost' weather balloons just out of reach of standard air defence weapons and loaded with sensors to track any response/action
Brainstorming meeting comes up with an annoying flotilla of 'peacefully lost' weather balloons just out of reach of standard air defence weapons and loaded with sensors to track any response/action
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: London
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can’t really understand what the problem is. How is floating a weather balloon/surveillance balloon over someones airspace any different to having surveillance satellite in a LEO?
I’m pretty sure that if it is >FL600, the there is very little risk. After all, i’d have a guess that the US overflies many other countries >FL600 with both manned and unmanned surveillance systems.
Now, if sovereign airspace had a internationally recognised vertical limit, then this incident would be different.
I’m pretty sure that if it is >FL600, the there is very little risk. After all, i’d have a guess that the US overflies many other countries >FL600 with both manned and unmanned surveillance systems.
Now, if sovereign airspace had a internationally recognised vertical limit, then this incident would be different.
I thought the Navy was going to arm U2 aircraft with anti shipping missiles during the cold war.
Launch the U2 from a carrier.
Maybe could use a U2 to launch an attack or at least get a closer look at the balloon -- bit extreme -- I am sure script writers are already at work on the next movie of the week.
Launch the U2 from a carrier.
Maybe could use a U2 to launch an attack or at least get a closer look at the balloon -- bit extreme -- I am sure script writers are already at work on the next movie of the week.
What if it is just a high altitude research balloon gone astray after all? Better to leave it up there and claim it is a spy balloon, thereby generating rage and frustration against the PRC, than bring it down only to find it wasn't a surveillance balloon after all. 
The following users liked this post:
Most likely the US knows by their ELINT that it is only a weather ballon, with a simpel TX for temp, altitude and humidity. If they had an high data rate encrypted stream transmitted from the ballon it would be down already.
Originally Posted by Ninthace
What if it is just a high altitude research balloon gone astray after all? Better to leave it up there and claim it is a spy balloon, thereby generating rage and frustration against the PRC, than bring it down only to find it wasn't a surveillance balloon after all.
This balloon, with its considerable payload hovering over the continental US, capable or not...is a message.
I am somewhat confused. I am reading and hearing on the news that this balloon is steerable, and is currently ‘hovering’ over Montana.
This is simply not possible if this is indeed a balloon. Balloons, by definition, have no form of propulsion, they drift with the wind and always have zero airspeed, with their groundspeed being the wind speed at their location and altitude. They therefore cannot steer - it is physically impossible to steer something with zero airspeed. I know hot air balloons can be ‘guided’ by changing altitude to take advantage of varying wind speed and direction, but they are still just drifting with the wind.
If this device is indeed steerable, and is now hovering over Montana despite prevailing westerlies at it’s location, it is not a balloon, it is an airship. This then directly contradicts China’s assertion that is a balloon that has drifted off course.
This is simply not possible if this is indeed a balloon. Balloons, by definition, have no form of propulsion, they drift with the wind and always have zero airspeed, with their groundspeed being the wind speed at their location and altitude. They therefore cannot steer - it is physically impossible to steer something with zero airspeed. I know hot air balloons can be ‘guided’ by changing altitude to take advantage of varying wind speed and direction, but they are still just drifting with the wind.
If this device is indeed steerable, and is now hovering over Montana despite prevailing westerlies at it’s location, it is not a balloon, it is an airship. This then directly contradicts China’s assertion that is a balloon that has drifted off course.
Last edited by Baldeep Inminj; 4th Feb 2023 at 12:39.
The following users liked this post:
Originally Posted by Flyhighfirst
Why not shoot it down? Collateral damage would be almost zero chance. You don’t destroy it. A couple of rounds from an aircraft. Wait to see if it starts descending. No well then a couple more rounds. Eventually it is going to start a slow descent to the ground.
This does sound all very strange.
This does sound all very strange.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Most likely the US knows by their ELINT that it is only a weather ballon, with a simpel TX for temp, altitude and humidity. If they had an high data rate encrypted stream transmitted from the ballon it would be down already.
That’s a very big balloon, as it would have to be to be visible from the ground at 60K feet.
Originally Posted by Brewster Buffalo
First the bomber gap, then the missile gap so now does the West have a balloon gap!?!
The following users liked this post:
Originally Posted by Baldeep Inminj
I am somewhat confused. I am reading and hearing on the news that this balloon is steerable, and is currently ‘hovering’ over Montana.
This is simply not possible if this is indeed a balloon. Balloons, by definition, have no form of propulsion, they drift with the wind and always have zero airspeed, with their groundspeed being the wind speed at their location and altitude. They therefore cannot steer - it is physically impossible to steer something with zero airspeed. I know hot air balloons can be ‘guided’ by changing altitude to take advantage of varying wind speed and direction, but they are still just drifting with the wind.
If this device is indeed steerable, and is now hovering over Montana despite prevailing westerlies at it’s location, it is not a balloon, it is an airship. This then directly contradicts China’s assertion that is a balloon that has drifted off course.
This is simply not possible if this is indeed a balloon. Balloons, by definition, have no form of propulsion, they drift with the wind and always have zero airspeed, with their groundspeed being the wind speed at their location and altitude. They therefore cannot steer - it is physically impossible to steer something with zero airspeed. I know hot air balloons can be ‘guided’ by changing altitude to take advantage of varying wind speed and direction, but they are still just drifting with the wind.
If this device is indeed steerable, and is now hovering over Montana despite prevailing westerlies at it’s location, it is not a balloon, it is an airship. This then directly contradicts China’s assertion that is a balloon that has drifted off course.
After all, drones can be piloted from halfway across the world - ignoring the fact that the latter have wings, flying controls and an engine.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 54
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Space is a lie
The flat earthers will have a field day: To them this will prove their claim that all satellites are actually balloons and there is no such thing as space.
Originally Posted by MechEngr
I'm going to get my shovel. Gotta get a head start on the mine gap. Also getting some jars to store the precious bodily fluids.
Time to pull the SR-71 out of the Smithsonian and fire her up one last time. Get the old guys back out of retirement.
"We're getting the band back to together!".
Ram the sucker!
A Mach 3 pass oughta upset the apple cart.
Or...
Just ask the Chinese nicely if they'll happily share the probably very useful weather reports over the US at that altitude as it might actually be a weather balloon?
"We're getting the band back to together!".
Ram the sucker!
A Mach 3 pass oughta upset the apple cart.
Or...
Just ask the Chinese nicely if they'll happily share the probably very useful weather reports over the US at that altitude as it might actually be a weather balloon?
Originally Posted by BigBoreFour
Time to pull the SR-71 out of the Smithsonian and fire her up one last time. Get the old guys back out of retirement.
"We're getting the band back to together!".
Ram the sucker!
A Mach 3 pass oughta upset the apple cart.
"We're getting the band back to together!".
Ram the sucker!
A Mach 3 pass oughta upset the apple cart.
