Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Chinese spy balloon over US

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Chinese spy balloon over US

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 11:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,678
Received 822 Likes on 475 Posts
Originally Posted by India Four Two
Yes, Montana is about 50% larger than the UK in area and has only 2% of the population - about one million. It's a big state - 550 miles east-west and 300 miles north south.

You could shoot the balloon down with minimal risk of hitting anyone!
Why bother? Its presence is known and knocking it down gives an indication of high altitude defence capability.
Ninthace is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 12:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 360
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Looks more like a university or scientific instrument than a military asset...
ChrisJ800 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 12:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not Syderknee
Posts: 1,011
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How did it get this far before being noticed? Doesn't the US have an ADIZ? I would have thought a 3xbus sized floating o ject would have triggered something before it was over the top of mainland US, and been dealt with before that point.
rmcdonal is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 12:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,810
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
BBC News reporting that it "flew over several sensitive military installations".

Presumably, being a balloon, then like any other balloon it just went where the wind took it?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 12:21
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,678
Received 822 Likes on 475 Posts
Originally Posted by rmcdonal
How did it get this far before being noticed? Doesn't the US have an ADIZ? I would have thought a 3xbus sized floating o ject would have triggered something before it was over the top of mainland US, and been dealt with before that point.
Top of my head but isn't most of it is thin plastic? And it would have a very low doppler.
Ninthace is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 12:41
  #26 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 941
Received 312 Likes on 184 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
BBC News reporting that it "flew over several sensitive military installations".
I managed that as they were not marked as such on the half mil map. The discussion with MOD Plod was interesting as they appeared not to know about the omission either. It ended with "now that you know, don't do it again".

B Fraser is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 12:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,370
Received 359 Likes on 208 Posts
Minuteman silos are easily spotted using Google earth - I doubt a balloon would add much info
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 13:37
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,355
Received 85 Likes on 33 Posts
Stand down - it's a weather balloon

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-64515033
ETOPS is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 13:37
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Why bother? Its presence is known and knocking it down gives an indication of high altitude defence capability.
True, but by the same token if it is feeding intelligence back in real time you don't want it staying aloft.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 13:39
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
BBC News reporting that it "flew over several sensitive military installations".

Presumably, being a balloon, then like any other balloon it just went where the wind took it?
Presumably, the Chinese (assuming it was them) waited until favourable winds were forecast, and from nearly 20 km up it doesn't have to pass over the targets in order to get a good look at them.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 13:46
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Only occasionally above FL50
Age: 71
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Perhaps it is a stray weather balloon- but the PRC would say that, wouldn’t they? If it is actually spying then it might be more beneficial for the US to intercept its transmissions and decode what it is reporting than it would be to bring it down - if indeed they have the technology to bring down something flying at perhaps 80,000 feet. If they do have the technology they might not want to demonstrate it.
Andrewgr2 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 13:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
Minuteman silos are easily spotted using Google earth - I doubt a balloon would add much info
The “sensitive area” claim is a media distractor. While there’s plenty of physical security sensitive areas associated with Malmstrom AFB, there’s nothing sensitive to aerial surveillance. If you want to photograph an ICBM silo, go rent a C172 and snap away. Much more economical than a high-altitude balloon. Anything “sensitive” associated with the Malmstrom ICBM facilities is underground. The locations of the ICBM silos is widely known; e.g., the U.S. is required to provide its ICBM silo geographic coordinates to Russia (and vice versa) under arms control treaties.
BFSGrad is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 14:00
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
If you want to photograph an ICBM silo, go rent a C172
​​​​​​​Wouldn't have to range to cross the Pacific.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 14:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mostly in my own imagination
Posts: 469
Received 276 Likes on 126 Posts
Spying Over Montana?

Looking at a map I've always got the feeling that Montana is an old man spying on Idaho. Sticking his nose right into Idaho's business




You can't unsee that now





"If you want to photograph an ICBM silo, go rent a C172 and snap away" - Not so easy to do in the US any more. Not if you're not a citizen at least
Sue Vêtements is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Sue Vêtements:
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 14:49
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,678
Received 822 Likes on 475 Posts
Originally Posted by melmothtw
True, but by the same token if it is feeding intelligence back in real time you don't want it staying aloft.
If you know it is there, you do not give it any intelligence to gather other than height, pressure, wind speed, temperature, humidity, atmospheric composition, presence of pollutants, incidence of cosmic rays, ozone levels and so on.
Ninthace is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 14:56
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
If you know it is there, you do not give it any intelligence to gather other than height, pressure, wind speed, temperature, humidity, atmospheric composition, presence of pollutants, incidence of cosmic rays, ozone levels and so on.
Lol, good luck getting any government/military organisation to move that quick.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 15:01
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,738
Received 149 Likes on 74 Posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fu-Go_balloon_bomb

Maybe it has been drifting around since 1945.
albatross is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 15:03
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,678
Received 822 Likes on 475 Posts
Originally Posted by melmothtw
Lol, good luck getting any government/military organisation to move that quick.
We used to!
Ninthace is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 15:10
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,244
Received 619 Likes on 225 Posts
Originally Posted by MechEngr
Don't forget to correct for curvature of the Earth!
Negloble over a 5 mile base line.

Nearly Legober ...... a bit early for that.

Fanger trouble

Last edited by langleybaston; 3rd Feb 2023 at 15:39.
langleybaston is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2023, 15:16
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
Why bother? Its presence is known and knocking it down gives an indication of high altitude defence capability.
Not much to reveal as the U.S. routinely tests its various high- and mid-level missile defense systems. The oddity would be employing such a capability from the interior of the U.S. Seems a Patriot would do the job.
BFSGrad is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.