F-35 accident Fort Worth 15/12/22 - pilot ejected ok
Based on the previous descriptions in the thread, the pitch attitude will be commanded by the FBW system and achieved by managing the output from one of the two downward thrust sources. It would be a reasonable guess that the attitude will be aimed at putting all 3 wheels on the deck at the same time. Perhaps an F-35 driver can enlighten us if this is wide of the mark.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 74
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 74
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
Eleven [out of 33] F-35 fighters grounded after US crash 25 Dec 2022 https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-725763 "...the IDF and Lockheed Martin, who manufactures the F-35, pointed out that it is not certain that the Israeli F-35A has the same problem. Rather, they emphasized that the grounding, which only applies to 11 aircraft out of a much larger fleet of F-35s and other planes, was taken as a precaution...."
Salute!
To answer the question about pitch attitude, I'll describe short as I can what I saw here when the Bee did a go around from an approach with all the doors open and what looked like normal pitch maneuvering. Was #3 behind an A and a C. So my guess is the flight was a demo for some brass.
The A and C landed and the Bee went up to downwind just like a normal plane with all doors open. It turned base and flew to the runway just like basic planes do, and at 100 feet or so leveled, slowed and went into a hover. Plane maintained perfectly level and the pilot rotated the heading 90 deg one way then back. Once more go around after it gained speed and this time came in a bit slower than I suspect a normal landing would be and with minimal flare plopped onto the runway, then turned off after about 300 feet or so.
So the part about the control laws blending in and out according to the speed seems to describe what I saw that day.
Gums sends...
To answer the question about pitch attitude, I'll describe short as I can what I saw here when the Bee did a go around from an approach with all the doors open and what looked like normal pitch maneuvering. Was #3 behind an A and a C. So my guess is the flight was a demo for some brass.
The A and C landed and the Bee went up to downwind just like a normal plane with all doors open. It turned base and flew to the runway just like basic planes do, and at 100 feet or so leveled, slowed and went into a hover. Plane maintained perfectly level and the pilot rotated the heading 90 deg one way then back. Once more go around after it gained speed and this time came in a bit slower than I suspect a normal landing would be and with minimal flare plopped onto the runway, then turned off after about 300 feet or so.
So the part about the control laws blending in and out according to the speed seems to describe what I saw that day.
Gums sends...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 74
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
Spoiler
"...A source familiar with the program, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss details of the incident, said the JPO’s initial assessment found that a propulsion system issue led to the Dec. 15 crash of the hovering F-35B, which has now led to broader groundings in the fleet. The source said that, in guidance to the services, the JPO said a failure of atube used to transfer high-pressure fuel in the fighter’s F135 engine prompted the office to update its safety risk assessments. The JPO also told the services that jets with fewer than 40 hours of flying are affected, this source said...."
Israel have apparently grounded their F-35As as a result of the Fort Worth crash so whatever went wrong might not be isolated to the B model.
https://eurasiantimes.com/us-israel-...rash-in-texas/
https://eurasiantimes.com/us-israel-...rash-in-texas/
Salute!
Rumor on the street over in the States is a problem with a fuel line or other component that is pressurized and has several functions. Remember, this is "rumor network". So could be a component they are looking at that is common on the engine, regardless of the A,B or C.
Gums sends...
Rumor on the street over in the States is a problem with a fuel line or other component that is pressurized and has several functions. Remember, this is "rumor network". So could be a component they are looking at that is common on the engine, regardless of the A,B or C.
Gums sends...
Salute!
Rumor on the street over in the States is a problem with a fuel line or other component that is pressurized and has several functions. Remember, this is "rumor network". So could be a component they are looking at that is common on the engine, regardless of the A,B or C.
Gums sends...
Rumor on the street over in the States is a problem with a fuel line or other component that is pressurized and has several functions. Remember, this is "rumor network". So could be a component they are looking at that is common on the engine, regardless of the A,B or C.
Gums sends...
BTW, saw an article yesterday that said the "aircraft ejected the pilot". Now, given the accuracy of reporting, I'm inclined to take that with a grain of salt. But if it is in fact correct, it would suggest the ejection was automatic, not commanded by the pilot.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 74
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
Not familiar with the specifics of the F135 engine, but it's standard design practice on jet engines that the high-pressure fuel doesn't only go into the burner - it's used as muscle for various actuators such as variable vanes and bleeds, etc. - so lots of fuel lines snaking their way around the engine. Typical pressure downstream of the fuel metering unit is around 300 psi - so any crack in a fuel line is going to result in a large fuel leak - not only do you have a big risk of fire if a line fails, you lose muscle pressure to the various actuators. In other words, bad things are likely to happen.
Smoke (or flames) is a pretty common indicator...
Smoke (or flames) is a pretty common indicator...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 74
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
Quote from previous graphic: F-35 Canopy Design Description 2009 LM
- Transparency is Single Piece Formed & Stretched Acrylic
- Thick Windscreen is Fwd of the Bowframe & Transitions to Thinner Transparency Section Aft
- CTOL & CV Canopy Designs are Common & Windscreen Design is Tri-variant Common
- Flexible Linear Shape Charge Bonded to IML [Inner Mould Line] to Facilitate Pilot Escape
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/th...%20Studies.pdf [no longer there]

Last edited by SpazSinbad; 31st Dec 2022 at 23:15. Reason: + quote +