Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Aeronautical Charts "FI" identification beacons

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Aeronautical Charts "FI" identification beacons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2022, 11:29
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,813
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
The red one at RAF Newton (located at ground level on the south side of the airfield) was still working for some years after the airfield closed. There’s no sign of it now though. Hopefully it’s gone to a museum because it had been the only “nav aid” at Newton.
Apart from the CADF/DRDF.
chevvron is online now  
Old 13th Nov 2022, 12:43
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The cupola over the RAF College main hall houses the last operational aerial lighthouse in the UK, a legacy from days when RNAS aircraft operated between the east coast and Cranwell (HMS Daedalus).
In the 1920s and 30s, ahead of radio navigation aids, a network of aerial lighthouses had been set up to guide aircraft at night. In the dome is a light, which, in the early days, could be seen as far as thirty miles away as the UK’s most inland lighthouse. The modern light is not so powerful and scans at 15 rpm.

copy and paste from this:

https://www.cranwellian-ian.com/ewEx...%20Copy%29.pdf
deltahotel is online now  
Old 13th Nov 2022, 14:31
  #43 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Apart from the CADF/DRDF.
I’m well aware of those, having done QGH letdowns (some quite good, some definitely not, as in “I don’t recognise this place, can you see an airfield?”), but I wouldn’t consider them Navaids in the usual, pilot interpreted sense, any more than a ground based radar is.

We could otherwise perhaps include the steam plumes from the power stations on the river Trent bubbling through the cloud layer below and asking for true bearings from other airfields in that area.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2022, 17:16
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,807
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
I’m well aware of those, having done QGH letdowns (some quite good, some definitely not, as in “I don’t recognise this place, can you see an airfield?”), but I wouldn’t consider them Navaids in the usual, pilot interpreted sense, any more than a ground based radar is.
Nothing wrong with a decent QGH. I was brought up doing endless QGH letdowns, with simultaneous UHF and VHF. As a trainee, we got so busy my screen controller ended up doing 2/3 high-level UHF [Canberras/JPs] while I was also doing 2/3 low level VHF [Varsities]..

Fun times!
MPN11 is online now  
Old 13th Nov 2022, 18:02
  #45 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
But it depended more on the skill of the controller, rather than the pilot, to make it a good one.
ShyTorque is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.