Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Can Wigston survive the onslaught?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Can Wigston survive the onslaught?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 11:32
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding is the the New DCom Ops has been brought forward by 6 months, I suspect that the new CAS will be announced before Nov 22, this was the original date for DCom Ops to be in place and CAS to replaced by Apr 24.
RotorsTurningRefuel is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 12:29
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RotorsTurningRefuel
and CAS to replaced by Apr 24.
By Apr 24? A typo?? Lots of damage to be done between now and Apr 24!!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 13:18
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roland Pulfrew
By Apr 24? A typo?? Lots of damage to be done between now and Apr 24!!

That was the original plan as I understood it
RotorsTurningRefuel is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 13:30
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Up Narf
Posts: 428
Received 131 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
The end of the day, whether PM or CAS, the buck stops at the top of the food chain, everything on their watch is their reponsibility, and he is that man.
Nobody told Boris that until the knifes came out.
Diff Tail Shim is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 14:50
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Age: 64
Posts: 468
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Is there any real suggestion that standards are being relaxed.

Or is it, like so many other areas in society, qualified people who are not white and male are losing out to a system that recruits in its own image?
Airbanda is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 14:56
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by tucumseh
+

Found negligent by Coroner; only escaping gross negligence, and hence corporate manslaughter charge, by dint of lying by omission and the law not permitting her to reopen when she found out.

(I wonder why the media didn't report that one?)

Didn’t fit into the meejahs own agendas. They have no interest in such trivia, Tuc, no diversity/inclusivity content.
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 15:07
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Wilson was like Marmite. He worked wonders when AOC in C RAFG. From my viewpoint, hard as nails, efficient, fair.
Other colours are available..
And he had the decency to go when time was up.

Much more recently a VSO went because he offered his arse as a garden bike rack. A very small sin compared with the present disaster.

Re: Sir Sandy

totally agree your sentiments here. Great boss to ‘us erks’ in RAFG. Hard on his pilots but got results. Fair and always supportive to his troops.marmite indeed.

IMHO He Got stitched up by Rifkin, at the time, following a meejah ****storm over the ‘grace and favour’ redecorations. So perhaps Wallace will cave in to them and sort out the current clusterfcuk?

one can only hope..

Last edited by oldmansquipper; 22nd Aug 2022 at 19:36.
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 17:28
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Frankly I think this is the tip of the iceberg. I don’t think this is just about recruiting, but that it extends quite a way up to promotion and command boards at senior levels if rumours are to be believed. If that’s the case, I don’t see how any of the Air Force Board can come out of this looking good.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 18:29
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,868
Received 2,818 Likes on 1,200 Posts
It does read like promotion is based upon wokeism and diversity and not military capability for senior staff, say the right things and you progress.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 18:29
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,067
Received 182 Likes on 68 Posts
He shouldn’t be allowed to fade away. He should be dismissed publicly for his incompetence in command.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 19:00
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Up Narf
Posts: 428
Received 131 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
It does read like promotion is based upon wokeism and diversity and not military capability for senior staff, say the right things and you progress.
PM decides on all air rank promotions. As Skywalker said to us as he shut the Jags down early.
Diff Tail Shim is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 19:32
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Melchett01
Frankly I think this is the tip of the iceberg. I don’t think this is just about recruiting, but that it extends quite a way up to promotion and command boards at senior levels if rumours are to be believed. If that’s the case, I don’t see how any of the Air Force Board can come out of this looking good.
Glad to see that somebody paid attention in General Service Knowledge!!! It isn't just Wigston that is driving this!!
MAINJAFAD is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2022, 22:53
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,868
Received 2,818 Likes on 1,200 Posts
Originally Posted by Diff Tail Shim
PM decides on all air rank promotions. As Skywalker said to us as he shut the Jags down early.
So hiring yes men instead of best men……. And women.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2022, 00:30
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,202
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Line Entry
Speedywheels,

To put your mind at ease a little, there has been no suggestion from the Airships that technical training lower its standards for minority groups. The standard is still the standard for all. (There has been considerable discussion over the past few years about what that standard should be, but that’s a different issue…)
The problem is when you have quota’s what do you think happens when to make this years quota and it is nearing year end, the next X number of the right demographic HAVE to pass.

I have personally witnessed this scenario, The sad part is it doesn’t just diminish the institution, it diminishes minority members who got where they are because they worked hard, had their Shyte together, and were respected and valued ship mates.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2022, 06:08
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,759
Received 221 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by oldmansquipper
Re: Sir Sandy

totally agree your sentiments here. Great boss to ‘us erks’ in RAFG. Hard on his pilots but got results. Fair and always supportive to his troops.marmite indeed.

IMHO He Got stitched up by Rifkin, at the time, following a meejah ****storm over the ‘grace and favour’ redecorations. So perhaps Wallace will cave in to them and sort out the current clusterfcuk?

one can only hope..
I would agree that Sir Sandy Wilson was stitched up but not that it was by SoS Malcolm Rifkind, who was also misled by the RAF High Command over the Mull of Kintyre pilots. You have to ask yourself who benefitted from him not getting the top job? Hardly Sir Malcolm!

As to the media, where would they get detailed information about the costs of curtains, approved or otherwise, if they weren't so briefed? Who would have briefed them? Sir Malcolm?
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2022, 08:56
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Chugalug2
I would agree that Sir Sandy Wilson was stitched up but not that it was by SoS Malcolm Rifkind, who was also misled by the RAF High Command over the Mull of Kintyre pilots. You have to ask yourself who benefitted from him not getting the top job? Hardly Sir Malcolm!

As to the media, where would they get detailed information about the costs of curtains, approved or otherwise, if they weren't so briefed? Who would have briefed them? Sir Malcolm?
good point, chug.
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2022, 09:25
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Age: 67
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Chugalug2
I would agree that Sir Sandy Wilson was stitched up but not that it was by SoS Malcolm Rifkind, who was also misled by the RAF High Command over the Mull of Kintyre pilots. You have to ask yourself who benefitted from him not getting the top job? Hardly Sir Malcolm!

As to the media, where would they get detailed information about the costs of curtains, approved or otherwise, if they weren't so briefed? Who would have briefed them? Sir Malcolm?
Embroidered rather than stitched up? A friend told me he kept duplicate files at home on all the embellishments at Rheindahlen because he was concerned the office set might vanish. Best not to enquire about Pantechnicons allegedly transporting the contents of the Berlin residence back to an unknown private destination in the UK.

At the time of carpetgate and the £250K refurbishment, Sir Malcolm was in a different command and would have had no visibility. Whatever you think of his subsequent sins, I don’t believe he was in any way connected.

There is a fine line between feathering one’s nest and corruption.
Fortissimo is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2022, 11:30
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Fortissimo
Embroidered rather than stitched up? A friend told me he kept duplicate files at home on all the embellishments at Rheindahlen because he was concerned the office set might vanish. Best not to enquire about Pantechnicons allegedly transporting the contents of the Berlin residence back to an unknown private destination in the UK.

At the time of carpetgate and the £250K refurbishment, Sir Malcolm was in a different command and would have had no visibility. Whatever you think of his subsequent sins, I don’t believe he was in any way connected.

There is a fine line between feathering one’s nest and corruption.

While Wilson left the RAF a short while after Rifkind left Defence, the latter was Secretary of State when the decision was made six months earlier. (Feb 1995). Notably, a couple of months later, in April 1995, Rifkind was lied to by senior officers over the Mull of Kintyre affair; and to his great credit later breached convention by speaking up about it alongside John Major. I wonder if the same CAS briefed him about Wilson?
tucumseh is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2022, 11:56
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,687
Received 852 Likes on 495 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Pistons Forever
The problem is when you have quota’s what do you think happens when to make this years quota and it is nearing year end, the next X number of the right demographic HAVE to pass.

I have personally witnessed this scenario, The sad part is it doesn’t just diminish the institution, it diminishes minority members who got where they are because they worked hard, had their Shyte together, and were respected and valued ship mates.
It never happened in the time I ran training squadrons and would not have. Either the trainees achieve the standard or they are chopped. Ethnicity and gender were not even considered by the review board. There was one occasion when we had an unusually high failure rate and there was an enquiry to find out why, but nobody suggested pushing them through.
Ninthace is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2022, 12:43
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've read through this thread and just have to say that I am glad I left the RAF when I did, now almost 30 years ago. However, this one brought back memories:
Originally Posted by Wrathmonk
Because they are always one step ahead of the 5hit storm. Do enough to get the required ticks in the box for promotion and move on. Could say the same for a large number of people across many ranks!
There were far too many people who had this attitude - do the minimum to look good so long as it isn't apparent until you have moved on. They were simply selfish and just did not have the "best interests of the service" in their mind at all, whether in the case of cost, airworthiness, flight safety, operational effectiveness or even just improved morale. They were the people who would only consider themselves, not the RAF as a whole, and they would not do something "because the book doesn't say I can do it" whereas, on the contrary, others had the view that "the book doesn't say I can't do it" and were willing to make a rational decision based on their knowledge and experience.

The trouble is that such people did have a better career, they did reach higher ranks and now they do have a massive pension. I find it sad that the situation has apparently not improved and could perceivably be worse!
possel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.