Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Platinum Jubilee Fly Past

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Platinum Jubilee Fly Past

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jun 2022, 13:00
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
On a slightly drifting note, during one of the “fill in” bits on TV with Ms Wark, Sir Stu Peach referred to HM as Commander in Chief of the armed forces. Is that right? Is that new? Is that wrong? I have only ever heard her described as “head” which is subtly different.
Timelord is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2022, 14:37
  #102 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
Originally Posted by goldox
According to Sky, the 70 symbol was made by the Red Arrows.

Of course… we should have realised…all fifteen of them
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2022, 20:16
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 607
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Good to see that the Reds came up with 9 aircraft, bearing in mind recent events.....
Well it’s not airframes they are short of, although another birdstrike just after the event in the Midlands.

Glad to see Monty hasn't lost it; references nailed even though he’s on a ground tour!
H Peacock is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2022, 13:13
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
My take on it is that the formation flew parallel to, but very slightly north of, the Mall and overflew the wing of the Palace closest to Constitution Hill.

If you look at the two Voyagers' tracks on FR24, from Colchester onwards the inbound track was 236°T to match the orientation of the Mall, so I don't see any evidence of a 3° divergence.
I've noticed that, at a couple of TTC flypasts that I've attended previously. There is a very obvious explantion of why this is deliberate, which I'm not going to describe here.
RomeoTangoFoxtrotMike is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2022, 13:17
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fortissimo
Or higher drag so higher thrust for same IAS, which would put the engine rpm into a more responsive range so more precise forward movement. Higher drag would also help with quicker rearward movement.
I've heard that same explanation given previously.
RomeoTangoFoxtrotMike is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2022, 15:04
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Arrows airbrake use: isn't it to push up the RPM to improve throttle response?
Higher thrust = more smoke in the Red's case.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2022, 15:14
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 545 Likes on 147 Posts
Airbrake out

I’m sure I recall someone telling me that the disturbed airflow behind the airbrake also helps to make the smoke trail bloom more. Not sure if that’s a genuine reason or not but it seems feasible to me.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2022, 06:15
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rcsa
Seriously, chaps - HE was sitting in a windowless room, with a list of aircraft provided by the RAF and filtered by a producer, with monitors showing five or six different camera angles, while a director made independent decisions on which camera view to broadcast, and echelons of aircraft came overhead at 200 knots. He possibly had no idea what the broadcast output was showing at that moment. And he's a TV personality, not ex-aircrew or a spotter. He'd been live for over two hours, on what may well be the biggest show of the year, with a guest in the studio to engage with.

It's probably not as tough as flying an inverted Buccaneer at 20 ft around the Glens, as you gents have all done, but it's not easy; and using this error to slag off the BBC tells more about your own political agenda than it does about HE's ability.
The commentator's job is to comment on what viewers are seeing adding context and information.

Anyone can read a script out of sync with the video. What's actually required for the job is someone who watches the broadcast stream and knows their stuff. That someone was not Huw Edwards.
CARR30 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2022, 16:09
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by rcsa
It's probably not as tough as flying an inverted Buccaneer at 20 ft around the Glens, as you gents have all done, .
He appears to be paid a sight more, though; we wonder why ...
WHBM is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2022, 16:53
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
He appears to be paid a sight more, though; we wonder why ...
Had he done it for free, would the whining be less, then?

CG

Last edited by charliegolf; 7th Jun 2022 at 18:14.
charliegolf is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2022, 14:51
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 900
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by charliegolf
Had he done it for free, would the whining wold be less, then?

CG
Nooooooooo.

It would have been more because he would have been deriving someone who knew how to do it of paid work!!

(And then someone else would have complained about you saying "for free" instead of "free" or "for nothing"! )
OvertHawk is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2022, 17:07
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, Scotland
Age: 51
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse my ignorance, but has any aircraft from the commonwealth air forces ever taken part in one the flypast to celebrate in one of the Queens anniversary's?
fallmonk is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2022, 17:53
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Frensham
Posts: 846
Received 90 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by fallmonk
Excuse my ignorance, but has any aircraft from the commonwealth air forces ever taken part in one the flypast to celebrate in one of the Queens anniversary's?

Canadian Sabres and Australian Vampires were part of the fly past for the 1953 RAF Coronation Review. The static display also included Australian Meteors and a New Zealand Bristol Freighter,

A list of participants is here: https://www.hampshireairfields.co.uk/nos10.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haEe5KfxvUg
Wokkafans is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2022, 18:16
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by OvertHawk

(And then someone else would have complained about you saying "for free" instead of "free" or "for nothing"! )
On,' watching it back'*, I see I butchered the entire post!

CG
*one that really grips my whatsit!
charliegolf is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2022, 18:19
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,808
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
… amd whimper!

Did the Kiwi Bristol Frightener fly to UK? Or walk? 🤠
MPN11 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2022, 07:32
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 302
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by wondering
The left Typhoon is clearly too far ahead. Or the other two Typhoon next to it too far behind.
I think the typographical term for what you're seeing there is a "serif".
Pearly White is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2022, 07:33
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,407
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
there were some great pictures of the 1953 parade in History & nostalgia a month or so back


Asturias56 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2022, 10:54
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,887
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts

Jolly good show.
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2022, 10:56
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Not far from a lot of solar panels.
Posts: 174
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Nice picture! Makes me feel really ancient, having worked on at least four of the types depicted - but wasn't in the RAF at that time.
Null Orifice is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2022, 11:00
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 302
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
there were some great pictures of the 1953 parade in History & nostalgia a month or so back

This must have been very nearly the entire RAF fleet. What are the four-engined taildraggers in the left foreground, please?
Pearly White is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.