Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New RAF Uniform

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 08:37
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 608
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
Let’s be honest. Whatever ideas are produced the ex-military members of the forum will hate it regardless.

For me personally I can virtually count on one hand the number of times I’ve worn my No.2 uniform since I left Cranwell so I don’t really care. And if I’m honest, I think anything would be an improvement on the ill-fitting, scratchy blue trousers and jumper that I’m currently expected to wear when the situation arises.

I have no idea if the attached images are a wind-up or genuine but I’m not about to get excited either way.

If it was up to me, I’d just ditch the concept of a No.2 blue uniform and use the MTP clothing as the everyday wear and No.1 for smart occasions.

I’ll still spend 99.9% of my days in a flying suit.

BV
Flying suits next, Bob. Same two tone as the utility dress,
Doctor Cruces is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 08:52
  #42 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet
BV

I’ve done Orderly Officer, Station Duty Officer and Duty Station Exec in a flying suit for 25+ years! As long as you have your No 1 ready for a KINFORM then there normally isn’t an issue. The policy to do it in blues changed in the mid 90s if I recall.
Very much depends on where you are and the influence of any given SWO/OC Base and how much the flying branch have p****d them off recently! When we were banned from doing it in flying clothing recently I made a point of doing it in PCS to avoid having to wear those sodding trousers!
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 09:07
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: sussex
Posts: 1,837
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
As someone long retired but still with an interest what is the rationale for changing the current uniform at what will, no doubt be a huge cost ? From personal e3xperience I hope that the production issue matches the quality of the trial issue assuming there is one. I still think all uniforms look better with a 'chipbag' !
ancientaviator62 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 09:13
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Yorkshire....God's Country
Age: 59
Posts: 470
Received 42 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet
The RAF did a blue/grey PCS trial at Leeming and Wittering.




There were a few issues with it. I think they quickly started looking tatty as the blue/grey faded like old jeans, and also the lighter colour or plain pattern showed up every oil spot and hydraulic stain. The dark navy blue of RN PCS and MTP PCS hides a multitude of sins. If we went for blue/grey RAF ‘crab fat’ blue PCS then it would need to be fairly stain resistant and colour fast.

However, my main beef would be such a uniform attracting a beret - unless they saw sense and allowed the field service cap to be worn in lieu as well. One stars and above are allowed to wear them, so it’s hardly that big a leap to allow ‘chip bags’ to be worn instead of berets with PCS type clothing - they were designed for field use, after all.

As for the Goldie Lookin’ Chain leisure suits - no thanks. If I want to look chav then I’ll go work in a leisure centre.

Thanks for that mate.......I just narrowly avoided a new laptop!! Priceless!!
mopardave is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 09:21
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
From what I can remember many flying stations now allow Orderly Officer duties to be conducted in flying suit. It’s been 5 years since I last worked on a UK flying Station though so things may have changed. In fact I’ve spent about 10 of my 22 years overseas so that may explain my lack of contact with the scratchy blue.

I may have exaggerated slightly (I have normal hands) but aside from courses such as FLAC/FSC/JOCC there really isn’t much call for me to drag the blues down from the loft.

MPN11, I’ll refrain from getting into the flying suit debate. I’ll keep my ‘elitist’ views on that to myself.

BV
Many flying stations, we have many? 😉
dctyke is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 09:25
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
With all the current "wokery", am I the only one a bit surprised at the reflectivity and apparent gender of the chosen model for the proposed garb? . ....
Haraka is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 09:39
  #47 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
Originally Posted by Haraka
With all the current "wokery", am I the only one a bit surprised at the reflectivity and apparent gender of the chosen model for the proposed garb? . ....
That’s probably the usual tone of the mannequins used by Sports Direct, who make that type of clothing.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 09:50
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Gloucs
Posts: 41
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
This drive for new uniform seems entirely consistent with the apparent MO of the current senior leadership: expend masses of time, money and effort on finding ‘solutions’ for problems that either don’t exist or aren’t a priority, while comprehensively failing to address long-term issues that effect a huge percentage of Forces personnel on a daily basis.
Stratnumberone is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 11:05
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Down West
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Elasticated waist
Pocket for stowing the spurs
Machine wash only so the hotel don't ruin them
Sorted
oldgrubber is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 13:19
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Stratnumberone
This drive for new uniform seems entirely consistent with the apparent MO of the current senior leadership: expend masses of time, money and effort on finding ‘solutions’ for problems that either don’t exist or aren’t a priority, while comprehensively failing to address long-term issues that effect a huge percentage of Forces personnel on a daily basis.
This. Nail, hammer, head. 👍🏻
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 13:28
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,836
Received 2,805 Likes on 1,195 Posts
If you read in the Housing thread i posted this

In the letter, the Annington chair also criticised the state of the properties – which are maintained by the Government as part of the initial sale agreement – as “unacceptable” for service personnel.

On Wednesday, Annington added that it is offering a £105 million fund to improve and modernise service personnel homes.

It told the MoD that the cash made available for the fund will instead need to be used for legal costs if an agreement is not found in the next two weeks and a litigation process begins.

Baroness Liddell also criticised the Government for spending £36.6 million in rent per year on around 7,230 vacant properties in the estate.“It makes no sense at all for the MoD either to spend these vast sums renting homes with no occupants, or to deprive would-be homeowners/buyers of a proper home of their own,” she wrote.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 14:59
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: S W France
Age: 80
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Does not affect me as I am long gone from the fray. The GP Jacket is not too bad even if it looks like a PTI uniform, but the two -tone ??
Surely in this day and woke age we should allow a choice of colours, Pink, Mauve, Orange and the other colours of the LGBT Etc flag.

Anyway what they look like on a slim young mannequin is one thing. On a less slim 53 year old perhaps another. Anybody with Photoshop ability want
to try it on the two characters in the Caption Competition?
Tengah Type is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 16:14
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Squalor
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Many years ago in RAFG, I met a forward air controller who lived with the army, calling into Gutersloh very occasionally for admin. He was ' man at C&A ', buying trousers shirts ​​and a snappy windcheater from shops. Obviously in a tasteful blue.WIthout comparators, the army never knew. And he got a smart crease resistant outfit that fitted.

Maybe this is the way forward?

Wetstart Dryrun is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 16:14
  #54 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Downwind.Maddl-Land
And anything that stops the General Public thinking you're an RAC mechanic gets my vote....
Are you speaking as a member of the RAF, or as a member of the RAC?
Two's in is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 16:58
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: lincs
Posts: 89
Received 86 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Stratnumberone
This drive for new uniform seems entirely consistent with the apparent MO of the current senior leadership: expend masses of time, money and effort on finding ‘solutions’ for problems that either don’t exist or aren’t a priority, while comprehensively failing to address long-term issues that effect a huge percentage of Forces personnel on a daily basis.
Sums it up nicely.
cheekychimp is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 17:19
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N.O.Y.B.
Posts: 272
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
"The images leaked online were misleading and have led some people to mistakenly believe that they are approved, final designs. They are instead an artist's impression of what the new uniforms could look like. The actual design process is still in the very early stages and no decisions have been made." In other words: stand by, the final designs could be even worse than those depicted above!
Il Duce is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 18:32
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: cowtown
Posts: 898
Received 59 Likes on 42 Posts
Will there be a maternity version ? Similar to the US navy attire , Asking for a friend
fitliker is online now  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 18:39
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Stratnumberone
This drive for new uniform seems entirely consistent with the apparent MO of the current senior leadership: expend masses of time, money and effort on finding ‘solutions’ for problems that either don’t exist or aren’t a priority, while comprehensively failing to address long-term issues that effect a huge percentage of Forces personnel on a daily basis.
Precisely the viewpoint of many on the coal face - younger and older.
Jobza Guddun is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 18:51
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N.O.Y.B.
Posts: 272
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
"Sir, the heating in the barrack block has broken down again."
" Never mind, we've got you a nice polyester stable belt. "
"I'd much rather have heating in the block, Sir."
"But we've got you a nice polyester stable belt."
Il Duce is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2022, 18:57
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Alles Über
Posts: 374
Received 42 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Il Duce
"Sir, the heating in the barrack block has broken down again."
" Never mind, we've got you a nice polyester stable belt. "
"I'd much rather have heating in the block, Sir."
"But we've got you a nice polyester stable belt."
And an electric scooter so you can get to the gym for a hot shower.
trim it out is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.