Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US sells carriers USS Kitty Hawk and John F Kennedy for 1 cent each

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US sells carriers USS Kitty Hawk and John F Kennedy for 1 cent each

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Oct 2021, 20:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,867
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,200 Posts
US sells carriers USS Kitty Hawk and John F Kennedy for 1 cent each

Sold as scrap, one of them will need towing round the bottom of South America to reach the breakers.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/n...nt/5980974001/
NutLoose is online now  
Old 8th Oct 2021, 21:38
  #2 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,385
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
Riddled with asbestos and other hazardous compounds - a reasonable price as they take the risk of the law suits both from the yards and workers where the dismantling will be done, as well as the law suits from the local communities to stop them.
ORAC is online now  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 10:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ORAC
Riddled with asbestos and other hazardous compounds - a reasonable price as they take the risk of the law suits both from the yards and workers where the dismantling will be done, as well as the law suits from the local communities to stop them.
Brownsville TX is a center for oil industry infrastructure production, lots of heavy industry there. I'd guess that the carrier deconstruction will be relatively routine work for that sector.
etudiant is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 12:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Brownsville TX is a center for oil industry infrastructure production, lots of heavy industry there. I'd guess that the carrier deconstruction will be relatively routine work for that sector.
GIven that they've done 5 already, plus numerous auxiliaries, yes.

These are the last of the non-nuclear big deck carriers to go - been in unmaintained reserve for well over 10 years.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 12:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 766
Received 544 Likes on 196 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Brownsville TX is a center for oil industry infrastructure production, lots of heavy industry there. I'd guess that the carrier deconstruction will be relatively routine work for that sector.
Towing an inert aircraft carrier some 18000 miles through some of the roughest seas in the world looks like some job though.
Video Mixdown is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 17:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,251
Received 331 Likes on 184 Posts
Originally Posted by Video Mixdown
Towing an inert aircraft carrier some 18000 miles through some of the roughest seas in the world looks like some job though.
is Panama Canal not an option due size and/or being towed?
212man is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 18:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 527
Received 240 Likes on 122 Posts
Perhaps they are affraid that an unpowered ship of that size may block it.
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 18:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Posts: 400
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 212man
is Panama Canal not an option due size and/or being towed?
I think they're far too wide for the Panama Canal locks. They're theoretically OK on the waterline but the enormous overhanging flight deck would collide with lock-side structures. And as munnst suggests, towing things that size through the canal would be d*mned awkward.
OldLurker is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 20:55
  #9 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,616
Received 291 Likes on 159 Posts
Kittyhawk looks to be around 300' wide at its max (blimey!), the canal is about 180' at the locks...
treadigraph is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 21:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 766
Received 544 Likes on 196 Posts
I know nothing of these matters, but I'm curious about whether it'd be possible or desirable to reactivate the systems needed for rudder control, and if it'd be considered safe for anyone to be aboard to steer.
Video Mixdown is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2021, 22:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 32°55'22"S 151°46'56"E
Age: 39
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It would almost certainly be unmanned with the rudder fixed amidship. It would be a fairly routine ocean tow for a large 'Anchor Handling Tug Supply' ship using extremely strong wires and a bridle. I suspect they'll use some form of weather routing to identify a good window for the passage.
L'aviateur is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2021, 07:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,407
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
If they can pull large oil rigs from Greenland to the Falkland's they can pull an aircraft carrier anywhere
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2021, 17:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Augusta, Georgia, USA (back from Germany again)
Posts: 234
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67) was my home away from home 1985-1989. I made two Mediterranean cruises on her. Before Desert Storm, my claim to fame was being on watch in Combat Information Center when we shot down two Libyan MiGs in the Gulf of Sidra. F-14s are gone. The ship is gone...

Great memories.

Side story - we made a port visit to Fort Lauderdale, Florida, right after Top Gun and the US Navy forcing down the airliner carrying one of the Achille Loro (spelling?) high jackers. I couldn't buy my own drinks when out in uniform.
LTCTerry is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2021, 17:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by LTCTerry
USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67) was my home away from home 1985-1989. I made two Mediterranean cruises on her. Before Desert Storm, my claim to fame was being on watch in Combat Information Center when we shot down two Libyan MiGs in the Gulf of Sidra. F-14s are gone. The ship is gone...

Great memories.

Side story - we made a port visit to Fort Lauderdale, Florida, right after Top Gun and the US Navy forcing down the airliner carrying one of the Achille Loro (spelling?) high jackers. I couldn't buy my own drinks when out in uniform.
What was your role, just out of interest?

What do you think of the description by Ward Caroll (former USN Cdr and F-14 Tomcat RIO)?

WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 12th Oct 2021, 20:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Augusta, Georgia, USA (back from Germany again)
Posts: 234
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by WE Branch Fanatic
What was your role, just out of interest?

What do you think of the description by Ward Caroll (former USN Cdr and F-14 Tomcat RIO)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyMfC3M0fZQ
At that time I was in Strike Operations w/in the Operations Department, helping to develop the daily Air Ops Plan. We were in four-section duty and I stood watch on the bridge (Conn or deck-under-instruction) and in Combat. So, eight on, eight off, with the office job and sleep to be worked into the eight off portion.

Funny you should ask about Ward's video. I have seen it. He and I have corresponded briefly and know some of the same people. I suspect Ward knows what he's talking about with his F-14 RIO background. His description of how movement affects the radar display seems to link US actions and Libyan actions pretty tightly.

When I was a little kid in the early 70s my dad was part of the special weapons school staff at Sandia Army Base/Kirtland Air Force Base. One of his USAF Lt Col counterparts had been a US Military Assistance Mission person to Libya as a captain. One of his trainees was a Captain MuammarGaddafi. It's an incredibly small world.

My retired Navy fighter pilot dad had the chance to ride with me on the ship for a few days on a "Tiger Cruise." Airshows were prohibited, but the "airpower at sea demonstration" was pretty impressive; my dad commented on the F-14's turning radius - "you could double that for the F-4."
LTCTerry is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2021, 21:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by LTCTerry
At that time I was in Strike Operations w/in the Operations Department, helping to develop the daily Air Ops Plan. We were in four-section duty and I stood watch on the bridge (Conn or deck-under-instruction) and in Combat. So, eight on, eight off, with the office job and sleep to be worked into the eight off portion.

Funny you should ask about Ward's video. I have seen it. He and I have corresponded briefly and know some of the same people. I suspect Ward knows what he's talking about with his F-14 RIO background. His description of how movement affects the radar display seems to link US actions and Libyan actions pretty tightly.

When I was a little kid in the early 70s my dad was part of the special weapons school staff at Sandia Army Base/Kirtland Air Force Base. One of his USAF Lt Col counterparts had been a US Military Assistance Mission person to Libya as a captain. One of his trainees was a Captain MuammarGaddafi. It's an incredibly small world.

My retired Navy fighter pilot dad had the chance to ride with me on the ship for a few days on a "Tiger Cruise." Airshows were prohibited, but the "airpower at sea demonstration" was pretty impressive; my dad commented on the F-14's turning radius - "you could double that for the F-4."
Were you Surface Warfare or an Aviator/NFO? Sorry if my question seems odd, but as a keen proponent of the Royal Navy's carriers I am particularly interested in the whole ship aspects of carrier operations, and how the different warships and aircraft work together, such as the carrier, F-14s, E-2, and the Aegis Cruiser.
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  
Old 13th Oct 2021, 08:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,407
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
"but as a keen proponent of the Royal Navy's carriers"

THAT is a classic British understatement ................... WEBF has carried on a one man or woman campaign for over 16 years on here - see "Future Carrier"

And amazingly has seen his/her dreams come to pass..............
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2021, 19:18
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Augusta, Georgia, USA (back from Germany again)
Posts: 234
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Video Mixdown
I know nothing of these matters, but I'm curious about whether it'd be possible or desirable to reactivate the systems needed for rudder control, and if it'd be considered safe for anyone to be aboard to steer.
I can answer that question. Steering is controlled from the bridge via an antique looking ship's wheel that sends an electronic signal to a pair of massive hydraulic rams for each of the two rudders. The Bridge is the 09 level - nine floors above the hangar bay. After Steering is three decks below the hangar bay in the very aft most end of the ship.

I was on the bridge as Junior Officer of the Deck (Conning Officer) once during underway replenishment operations when steering failed. Rather than an emergency breakaway we remained along side, and I ran from the bridge to after steering, sliding down the ladders like a movie and yelling at people to get out of my way. We switched control of steering from the Bridge to a small trick wheel in after steering. The helmsman then simply used the gyro compass to steer. Was rather exciting.

In after steering, there's a large chain mechanism that can be used to manually position the rudders. This would not work for steering purposes as it is far, far too slow. The hydraulic system was electrically powered.

We used double hearing protection in after steering - foam ear plugs and "mouse ears."

Mixdown - maybe more than your asked for
LTCTerry is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2021, 19:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Augusta, Georgia, USA (back from Germany again)
Posts: 234
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by WE Branch Fanatic
Were you Surface Warfare or an Aviator/NFO? Sorry if my question seems odd, but as a keen proponent of the Royal Navy's carriers I am particularly interested in the whole ship aspects of carrier operations, and how the different warships and aircraft work together, such as the carrier, F-14s, E-2, and the Aegis Cruiser.
I was a SWO with an interest in aviation. I knew enough about timing, logistics, flying, navigation, and math to pick up building a daily air plan pretty quickly. My boss was an A-6 pilot and his deputy an A-6 bombardier/navigator.
LTCTerry is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2021, 19:57
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
"but as a keen proponent of the Royal Navy's carriers"

THAT is a classic British understatement ................... WEBF has carried on a one man or woman campaign for over 16 years on here - see "Future Carrier"

And amazingly has seen his/her dreams come to pass..............
Given that at times the politicians have had trouble listening to the First Sea Lord and various analysts, why would they listen to me? Thanks for the confidence in my influence though! We need carriers, NATO needs us to have carriers, I am just dark blue - to the core.

Originally Posted by LTCTerry
I was a SWO with an interest in aviation. I knew enough about timing, logistics, flying, navigation, and math to pick up building a daily air plan pretty quickly. My boss was an A-6 pilot and his deputy an A-6 bombardier/navigator.
Good to hear - one might be forgiven for getting the feeling that the aviation and surface warfare experts were kept apart - not workable of course.
WE Branch Fanatic is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.