Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US Nuclear sub has hit an unknown object in the South China sea

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US Nuclear sub has hit an unknown object in the South China sea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Oct 2021, 21:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 391
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
An x-submariner looks at it
golder is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2021, 05:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 360
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
My last sailboat had downward sonar (depth gauge) and forward looking sonar for going into an anchorage. I assume these low current devices are not stealthy. I can understand a sub switching these off in time of war or when in foreign waters and wanting to be stealthy, but why not use them for the rest of the time? Obviously I am a pilot who can sail, but not a submariner! But is there a balance between safety and stealthiness?
ChrisJ800 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2021, 09:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 628
Received 192 Likes on 107 Posts
Originally Posted by ChrisJ800
My last sailboat had downward sonar (depth gauge) and forward looking sonar for going into an anchorage. I assume these low current devices are not stealthy. I can understand a sub switching these off in time of war or when in foreign waters and wanting to be stealthy, but why not use them for the rest of the time? Obviously I am a pilot who can sail, but not a submariner! But is there a balance between safety and stealthiness?
Even in peacetime, attack submarines spend their time doing stuff they don't want anyone else to see. How better to practice tracking and getting into position to attack an adversary, than doing it for real? How better to gather sonar and other data on your counterpart's vessels and capabilities? This is no secret; everyone's doing it, everyone knows everyone's doing it, and there are some pretty good books on the subject.

I should imagine the holy grail of underwater warfare is being able to track and take out your adversary's SSBNs, so you can bet there's a lot of effort going into this; if anyone does have that capability, you're not going to read about it for a very long time...
pasta is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2021, 10:31
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pasta
Even in peacetime, attack submarines spend their time doing stuff they don't want anyone else to see. How better to practice tracking and getting into position to attack an adversary, than doing it for real? How better to gather sonar and other data on your counterpart's vessels and capabilities? This is no secret; everyone's doing it, everyone knows everyone's doing it, and there are some pretty good books on the subject.

I should imagine the holy grail of underwater warfare is being able to track and take out your adversary's SSBNs, so you can bet there's a lot of effort going into this; if anyone does have that capability, you're not going to read about it for a very long time...
Please list some of these pretty good books. Thanks
Bueno Hombre is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2021, 11:23
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 628
Received 192 Likes on 107 Posts
Originally Posted by Bueno Hombre
Please list some of these pretty good books. Thanks
"The Silent Deep" by Jinks and Hennessey is the most comprehensive account I've read; if you're only going to read one book about submarines, this would be my recommendation.
"Blind Man's Bluff" is also a pretty good read, a bit lighter, with more of a focus on cable-tapping operations.
pasta is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2021, 13:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,372
Received 360 Likes on 209 Posts
Pasta is correct - all submarine arms spend their time trying on sneaking around. TF reminds us of the Soviet navies efforts in Sweden and of course the Finns often seem to have "unknown objects" wandering about their waters.

The British and the French managed a collision a few years back and there are stories, sometimes published as part of someone's obituary, about some scary close encounters in the past.

No-one talks about today of course but you can bet it's going on 24/7
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2021, 15:49
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,681
Received 830 Likes on 481 Posts
And the Royal Navy presumably still has shares in plywood and black paint so they can pretend it didn't happen - and I don't mean Ambush, Astute, Vanguard, Superb or Trafalgar.

It is something it has Talent for but then that wasn't the first time either.
Ninthace is online now  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 02:02
  #28 (permalink)  
YRP
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChrisJ800
Obviously I am a pilot who can sail, but not a submariner!
Have you considered that might be the next logical step for you? In progression of interests and hobbies.
YRP is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 02:51
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by pasta
"The Silent Deep" by Jinks and Hennessey is the most comprehensive account I've read... .
Ordered on Kindle just now.
The Secret State was good - so looking forward to this.
tartare is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 19:25
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Somewhere flat
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninthace
And the Royal Navy presumably still has shares in plywood and black paint so they can pretend it didn't happen - and I don't mean Ambush, Astute, Vanguard, Superb or Trafalgar. It is something it has Talent for but then that wasn't the first time either.
Knew I had this filed away somewhere. From October, 1968;


goofer3 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 20:22
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Recounted in reasonable detail from p311 in my copy of "The Silent Deep"

(For clarity, that's the HMS Warspite incident)

Last edited by Levelling_the_Land; 11th Oct 2021 at 20:24. Reason: Clarity
Levelling_the_Land is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 20:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,681
Received 830 Likes on 481 Posts
Originally Posted by Levelling_the_Land
Recounted in reasonable detail from p311 in my copy of "The Silent Deep"

(For clarity, that's the HMS Warspite incident)
HMS Sceptre also had a close encounter with an iceberg (aka K-211) that required the use of the battleshort to sort the situation out.
Ninthace is online now  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 20:53
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,763
Received 2,747 Likes on 1,171 Posts
Originally Posted by ChrisJ800
My last sailboat had downward sonar (depth gauge) and forward looking sonar for going into an anchorage. I assume these low current devices are not stealthy. I can understand a sub switching these off in time of war or when in foreign waters and wanting to be stealthy, but why not use them for the rest of the time? Obviously I am a pilot who can sail, but not a submariner! But is there a balance between safety and stealthiness?
I would imagine one reason is you would want your vessels operating in or near their wartime areas, thus if the poo did hit the fan and rapidly escalate literally in days, the boat would be where it was needed, not having to fast track there. Hence you wouldn’t want to announce your position.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 21:23
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,247
Received 628 Likes on 227 Posts
Originally Posted by tartare
Ordered on Kindle just now.
The Secret State was good - so looking forward to this.
Hennessy is brilliant, a historian of modern times, using modern language and a tinge of humour.
A very few days into the Chinese Plague he was interviewed by the Beeb. He said [I summarise badly] that history would be seen for many years as BC and AC ...... before Covid, and After it struck. He basically said this is the big one, the global consequences will be severe and are unknowable.

And here we are, 2 years in, with "crises" not just here but [ill-reported] just about everywhere: supply chains, shortages, civil disobedience, balances of power upset, .....

A brilliant man, the pre-eminent historian of modern Britain.
langleybaston is online now  
Old 11th Oct 2021, 21:35
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,299
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by goofer3
Knew I had this filed away somewhere. From October, 1968;

"..... the 20,000,000 nuclear submarine Warspite...." Looks like the creators of HMS Vigil must have learned from that.....

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2021, 15:42
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,706
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Union Jack
"..... the 20,000,000 nuclear submarine Warspite...." Looks like the creators of HMS Vigil must have learned from that.....

Jack
I think a '£' is missing from the front of that number.

A lot of RN submarines hit 'ice' over the years. 'Ice' often had a Russian accent.
Davef68 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2021, 15:54
  #37 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,763
Received 2,747 Likes on 1,171 Posts
An interesting one of late
Two of the UK’s most senior Royal Navy officers have strongly rejected the suggestion that a submarine could have sunk a fishing boat that went down off the Cornish coast 17 years ago with the loss of five lives.
Navy officers deny a submarine sank the fishing boat 17 years ago (msn.com)
NutLoose is online now  
Old 12th Oct 2021, 17:06
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,809
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Funnily enough I was watching an old episode of Kavanaugh QC the other day and the story was about a trawler lost with her crew. The owner and other locals started a conspiracy theory that there had been a collision with a submarine, but he had sent a non seaworthy boat to sea and sabotaged her for the insurance money.. I was reminded of the tragic loss of the Fishing Vessel Pescado.

As for submarines in deep water, see - Why Billion Dollar Nuclear Submarines Still Run Into Things Underwater.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2021, 08:10
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,944
Received 143 Likes on 86 Posts
In February this year a surfacing Japanese submarine in home waters hit the hull of a Chinese container ship right above.
Take your pick of the various news source interpretations from factual to derisory.
https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=su...&client=safari
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2021, 12:18
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,141
Received 96 Likes on 51 Posts
Seamount

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...j0kOzVUw7vYm5s




shades of the late Clive Cussler first novel




cheers
chopper2004 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.