AUKUS
Ok, let's paint a scenario shall we?
RAN takes out a Chinese destroyer with one of these you bewt new subs.
30 minutes later RAAF Tindal is a smoking hole in the ground.
If you are going to play with the big boys, carry a bigger stick. This is just embarrassing.
RAN takes out a Chinese destroyer with one of these you bewt new subs.
30 minutes later RAAF Tindal is a smoking hole in the ground.
If you are going to play with the big boys, carry a bigger stick. This is just embarrassing.
More likely the Chinese would sink one of our Destroyers or Frigates and then have the South China Morning Post write one of their Borat-like stories about Australians being crawling maggots in the dung of Americans or some other nonsense.
They watch too many movies. The Chinese are doing 'crazy Ivan'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRUpAipGu5w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRUpAipGu5w
Best 20 seconds of dialogue in the whole movie !!!!!!!
Two interesting stories in The Oz this morning - British Defence Secy and former US sub commander both saying that Oz boats will be Astutes.
Smaller, cheaper, (faster!) build avaliable at end of 2020s and more multi-mission capable.He said the submarine production would fit in with the British production cycle, given that the country has just kicked off its hunter-killer submarines, and the US is in full flow on its own boats. Australia has yet to decide whether to model its new submarine on the British or American models.
The British are in the final stages of completing the fifth Astute-class submarine, HMS Anson, which will begin sea trials early next year.
“We are in a strong position to help the Australians achieve that capability so I am very confident that British engineering, British skills, Australian nous, will deliver a very good submarine,” Mr Wallace said.
and:
Former submariner and navy commander Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at Washington’s Hudson Institute, said his discussions with US Navy and defence industry figures suggested the Virginia-class design would not be made available to Australia.
“I don’t get a sense that the US is going to share the Virginia re*actor plant with Australia,” he told The Australian. “I think it is pretty clear this is likely to be a British effort that the US supports through technology transfer.”
Smaller, cheaper, (faster!) build avaliable at end of 2020s and more multi-mission capable.He said the submarine production would fit in with the British production cycle, given that the country has just kicked off its hunter-killer submarines, and the US is in full flow on its own boats. Australia has yet to decide whether to model its new submarine on the British or American models.
The British are in the final stages of completing the fifth Astute-class submarine, HMS Anson, which will begin sea trials early next year.
“We are in a strong position to help the Australians achieve that capability so I am very confident that British engineering, British skills, Australian nous, will deliver a very good submarine,” Mr Wallace said.
and:
Former submariner and navy commander Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at Washington’s Hudson Institute, said his discussions with US Navy and defence industry figures suggested the Virginia-class design would not be made available to Australia.
“I don’t get a sense that the US is going to share the Virginia re*actor plant with Australia,” he told The Australian. “I think it is pretty clear this is likely to be a British effort that the US supports through technology transfer.”
Enter all these retired Admirals and Sub Commanders and defence 'experts' as well as un-named Pentagon persons saying no, that won't happen.
Like I said, who runs the US, the President or retired Admirals and defence mandarins.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
As I said previously, the problem the Australians buying the Virginia class would be getting the purchase through either, let alone both, House iof Congress. Even if they could it would take years - and they would also go to the end of the line behind the USN requirement.
Technology transfer is something the various committees would fight long and hard over.
The U.K., however, already has the technology, transferred aver the last few years for the PWR3 reactor*, which will fit comfortably inside an Astute.
All the UK required was for the President to authorise the UK to share what they already have - which he has done.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_PWR#PWR3
I workday think the main questions would be whether they get either of the last two boats with the PWR2b, for which, from what I have read, the line has been closed. I would doubt it.
The question would then be whether any of the Oz boats would be built at Barrow with a line then opened in Oz, or whether jigs and associated equipment would be transferred to Oz once boat 7 gets past the stage they are required.
In either case I would assume the reactors would all be built in the UK.
Technology transfer is something the various committees would fight long and hard over.
The U.K., however, already has the technology, transferred aver the last few years for the PWR3 reactor*, which will fit comfortably inside an Astute.
All the UK required was for the President to authorise the UK to share what they already have - which he has done.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_PWR#PWR3
I workday think the main questions would be whether they get either of the last two boats with the PWR2b, for which, from what I have read, the line has been closed. I would doubt it.
The question would then be whether any of the Oz boats would be built at Barrow with a line then opened in Oz, or whether jigs and associated equipment would be transferred to Oz once boat 7 gets past the stage they are required.
In either case I would assume the reactors would all be built in the UK.
Last edited by ORAC; 11th Oct 2021 at 16:04.
"and then we''ll shit off their coasht and lishten to their rock and roll and then we'll shail to Cuba, where the weather ish warm and sho ish the welcome. The order is, engage the shilent drive!"
The question would then be whether any of the Oz boats would be built at Barrow with a line then opened in Oz, or whether jigs and associated equipment would be transferred to Oz once boat. 7 gets past the stage they are required. In either case I would assume the reactors would all be built in the UK.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brizzle
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no spare capacity at Barrow. The RN want Astute boat 7 HMS Agincourt out as quickly as possible so they can get on with HMS Dreadnought to start replacing the aging Vanguard class boats.
Last edited by Senior Pilot; 11th Oct 2021 at 21:18. Reason: Stupid comment removed
A reason we got Astute number 7 was to keep Barrow busy till the Dreadnought builds came on stream and so avoid repeating the Astute basic SSN building techniques learning process. I daresay Boris, Ben and certainly Treasury would be quite happy for the RAN to have this boat and for the RAN's builders of choice to come and learn how things are done in the same way that BAE were helped. They can then take the jigs and special tools etc. off to Adelaide and build some more RAN modified Astutes around a RR reactor package, probably supplied ready to build in.
N
N
A reason we got Astute number 7 was to keep Barrow busy till the Dreadnought builds came on stream and so avoid repeating the Astute basic SSN building techniques learning process. I daresay Boris, Ben and certainly Treasury would be quite happy for the RAN to have this boat and for the RAN's builders of choice to come and learn how things are done in the same way that BAE were helped. They can then take the jigs and special tools etc. off to Adelaide and build some more RAN modified Astutes around a RR reactor package, probably supplied ready to build in.
N
N
I'd be very surprised if Astute (and its PWR2) form the basis of what is to come.
If Australia could get its hands on the EA-18G I doubt there’s much the US wouldn’t sell to us. The fetish in this thread about buying British is heartwarming, but when was the last time Australia made a major defence acquisition from the UK? Better yet when was the last time the RAN purchased an RN platform??
"when was the last time Australia made a major defence acquisition from the UK? Better yet when was the last time the RAN purchased an RN platform?? "
Cough, cough - three years ago
"In June 2018, the Australian Government announced that it had selected a modified version of the Type 26 platform as the planned replacement for its Anzac-class frigate.[39] This will see the Royal Australian Navy procure up to nine Hunter-class frigates, which will be constructed by BAE Systems Australia at ASC's shipyard in Osborne, South Australia"
Cough, cough - three years ago
"In June 2018, the Australian Government announced that it had selected a modified version of the Type 26 platform as the planned replacement for its Anzac-class frigate.[39] This will see the Royal Australian Navy procure up to nine Hunter-class frigates, which will be constructed by BAE Systems Australia at ASC's shipyard in Osborne, South Australia"
"Boat 7 was contracted because we need at least seven."
The 1997 SDR wanted 10, this was cut to 8 and at one point it looked as if they might only build 5 - but (thank God) #6 and #7 were ordered, partly to keep the yard open as per Boffin's post.
The biggest problem is how are they going to recreate the fabulous weather of Barrow in Adelaide?
The 1997 SDR wanted 10, this was cut to 8 and at one point it looked as if they might only build 5 - but (thank God) #6 and #7 were ordered, partly to keep the yard open as per Boffin's post.
The biggest problem is how are they going to recreate the fabulous weather of Barrow in Adelaide?
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
The Growler is hi-tech, but not that hi-tech.
Remember Australia had reportedly expressed interest in buying the F-22 back in 2008, but had been rebuffed. You think selling a nuke sub would be any easier?
https://www.reuters.com/article/aust...31393720080220
https://thehill.com/opinion/national...submarine-deal
Remember Australia had reportedly expressed interest in buying the F-22 back in 2008, but had been rebuffed. You think selling a nuke sub would be any easier?
https://www.reuters.com/article/aust...31393720080220
https://thehill.com/opinion/national...submarine-deal
The Raptor being sold overseas was prohibited specifically by the Obey Amendment, there’s no specific US instrument to prohibit the sale of the Virginia class as far as I’m aware.
Congressional approval is obviously not a done deal but it’s far from impossible in this case.
Congressional approval is obviously not a done deal but it’s far from impossible in this case.
I forget what the agreement Bush entered into with the UK and one with Australia was called. It was given a fancy name. Someone here would know of it. It was for tech transfer. That is still valid.
Anyone?
Anyone?
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
The Raptor being sold overseas was prohibited specifically by the Obey Amendment, there’s no specific US instrument to prohibit the sale of the Virginia class as far as I’m aware.
”…..While more specifics of the deal will be hammered out over the next 18 months, Congress can — and should — be skeptical of any “exception” that could weaken nonproliferation policy or insist on changes to avoid proliferation concerns.
Because the United States and Australia have an agreement that does not allow this sort of military transfer, Congress will get a say in whether it is amended.
Section 123 of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act (AEA) of 1954 governs nuclear cooperation between the United States and other countries, laying out nine non-proliferation criteria. As recently as 2010, Congress permitted the Australian “123 agreement” to come into force until at least 2040. That deal, however, pertains only to civilian projects and explicitly forbids the transfer of materials for “military nuclear propulsion.”
The agreement also bans the transfer of fuel defined as “highly-enriched uranium” (HEU), meaning uranium enriched to 20 percent or higher in the isotope Uranium-235 (U-235). All United States nuclear submarines rely on fuel enriched to 93.5 percent in the isotope U-235, which technically qualifies as weapon-grade. A new arrangement with Australia, as well as the overall Foreign Military Sales agreement, will require separate Congressional approval processes that Congress will need to consider carefully……”
The Growler is hi-tech, but not that hi-tech.
Remember Australia had reportedly expressed interest in buying the F-22 back in 2008, but had been rebuffed. You think selling a nuke sub would be any easier?
https://www.reuters.com/article/aust...31393720080220
https://thehill.com/opinion/national...submarine-deal
Remember Australia had reportedly expressed interest in buying the F-22 back in 2008, but had been rebuffed. You think selling a nuke sub would be any easier?
https://www.reuters.com/article/aust...31393720080220
https://thehill.com/opinion/national...submarine-deal
Anyone remember the agreement the UK and US and Australia US Signed about 2020-2025? It was after Boeing got fined for tech transfer to Australia, less than we already had access to..
Last edited by golder; 12th Oct 2021 at 11:58.
Australia already has the same level access to US tech. When the dust settles, you will find that AUKUS is more about the UK and Australia opening up more to each other. Expect an upcoming agreement.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-09-...hnology/660820
2007...The US has agreed to upgrade Australia's access to American military technology and it will be lifted to the same level as Britain has.
The US agreement.. Defence Trade Co-operation Treaty,
UK signed in Sept 2007
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007...eration-treaty
Australia signed in November 2007
https://www1.defence.gov.au/business...s-trade-treaty
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-09-...hnology/660820
2007...The US has agreed to upgrade Australia's access to American military technology and it will be lifted to the same level as Britain has.
The US agreement.. Defence Trade Co-operation Treaty,
UK signed in Sept 2007
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007...eration-treaty
Australia signed in November 2007
https://www1.defence.gov.au/business...s-trade-treaty
Last edited by golder; 12th Oct 2021 at 13:27.
