Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Royal Navy reveal visions of future fleet

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Royal Navy reveal visions of future fleet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Sep 2021, 08:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Well, as previously said, and as demonstrated repeatedly, they do have this thing for chasing air power at the expense of the surface and sub-surface fleet…. Even if it’s just at the level of utilising the time and efforts if their youngest and brightest.
Demonstrated repeatedly? Evidence please.
Chasing air power? Despite the pretensions of the 103 year experiment, the RN has always embraced airpower since inception, understands its value and wants to ensure that it is available when required.
Expense of surface and sub-surface fleets? A cursory examination of budgets shows you where the money actually goes....

Last edited by Not_a_boffin; 14th Sep 2021 at 09:46.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2021, 08:49
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
" the Royal Navy isn’t QUITE ready to place any orders based on it without staffing and submitting the usual threat assessments, capability definition studies, identification of key user requirements, feasibility studies, fleet trials, cost & operational effectiveness investment appraisals, balance of investment studies, pain & grief statements, concept of operations, etc."


Ahh thanks for that - makes sense - its a cunning scheme to keep people busy behind their desks for the next 10 years !!
You might have noticed that there's been a bonfire of staff billets in NCHQ over the last couple of years. This isn't a back door attempt to recreate them!
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2021, 17:14
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A more realistic, less sensationalised version of the conceptual thinking:
Originally Posted by RN website

The future of the Royal Navy and how it could further embrace autonomous technology, including drones, has been unveiled. Led by a design challenge for young engineers from UK Naval Engineering Science and Technology (UKNEST), the Royal Navy will develop a Future Autonomous Fleet programme that could shape how it operates over the next 50 years…

Although in the conceptual phase, the Royal Navy is on track to implement one of these futuristic visions into reality over the coming decade – The Persistent Operational Deployment Systems (PODS). PODS are interchangeable modules that can be fitted to the surface fleet. Similar in design to a shipping container, the PODS create the idea of a ‘plug and play’ warship and will enable Royal Navy ships of all sizes to be more adaptable and versatile when deployed. Delivered using innovative technology such as heavy-lift drones or autonomous boats, a ship will be able to receive the equipment it needs to be re-tasked quicker without the need to go into a port to collect it…
https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-an...-future-vision
FODPlod is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2021, 17:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
Sounds like Thunderbird 2.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2021, 18:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Warwick
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SciFi pie in the sky, a helium balloon would be far too vulnerable to attack, in the same way large surface ships would also be very difficulty to defend from a determined large scale attack. Very few ships have been sunk by enemy action since WW2, those that were showed how vulnerable they are to modern missiles.
Underwater craft deploying drones are much more likely to effective both in deterrent as well as attack.
Deltasierra010 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2021, 18:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bit more meat on the bones:
FODPlod is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2021, 22:42
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,879
Received 2,823 Likes on 1,203 Posts
I am delighted that we are getting after this: we have launched the 1SL Fellowship to deepen our critical thinking across all our workforce; we have established the Percy Hobart Fellowship to promote digital innovation throughout all levels of the Service; we are about to commence the updated junior staff course that promotes critical-thinking and business skills; we have opened recruitment to consider personnel on the Autistic Spectrum; and we are building a tool to capture the hidden skills of our people – a true digital profile. Small steps in refreshing our approach and harnessing the talent of all our people.
What an excellent choice of name for the Fellowship, for those that do not know Percy Hobart was the innovator who developed the funnies used during the landings on DDay.

https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/the-funny-tanks-of-d-day

One other thing in the paragraph that caught my eye was looking at recruiting people with Autism.
NutLoose is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.